Appropriate Technology for Municipal Solid Waste Management Based on Wastepreneurship Implementation

https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.64496

Diananto Prihandoko(1*), Arief Budiman(2), Prabang Setyono(3), Chafid Fandeli(4), Maria Theresia Sri Budiastuti(5)

(1) Postgraduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta, Central Java 57126, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Grafika No. 2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
(3) Postgraduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta, Central Java 57126, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Yogyakarta, Jl. Janti, Gedongkuning, Yogyakarta 55171, Indonesia
(5) Postgraduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta, Central Java 57126, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Piyungan landfill is the biggest landfill in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, which receives municipal solid waste (MSW) from two districts and a city, while its designed service time has been over and faces operational obstacles. Meanwhile, the volume of the MSW grows rapidly and exceeds the reduction rate in their sources. The difficulty in finding a new landfill area is the reason why appropriate technological alternatives in the MSW management are strongly needed. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the social and economic aspects and formulate appropriate technology based on the waste entrepreneurship (wastepreneurship) concept. The methods of this study were conducting calculation of waste characteristics and composition, social evaluation, and economic evaluation of the combination of composting, incinerator, and sanitary landfill. Waste characteristics and composition were taken using direct field measurement following Indonesia's National Standard Guideline about retrieving and measuring examples of urban waste emergence and composition. Characteristics of waste are used for the calculation of calorific value and energy. The social evaluation was conducted using an in-depth interview with the rag pickers. The economic evaluation was conducted using net present value, internal rate of return, and payback period. The result of the study shows that Piyungan Landfill with total combustion waste reach 82.22% has the potential of incinerator implementation. In social evaluation, the implementation of composting and incinerator technologies would open employment for the surrounding community and rag pickers. The economic evaluation shows the combination of composting and incinerator technologies was economically feasible with an average profit margin of 12.97% in the operational period of 18 years. In conclusion, the concept of wastepreneurship is relevant in Piyungan Landfill by adjusting the MSW management paradigm from previously cost-center into business-center.

Keywords


Economic evaluation; Landfill; Social evaluation; Solid waste management; Waste entrepreneurship

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abdoli M.A., Rezaei M., and Hasanian H. (2016). "Integrated solid waste management in megacities," Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 2, 289-298.
  2. Boardman, A.E. (2015). Cost–Benefit Analysis. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  3. Brotosusilo, A., Nabila, S.H., Negoro, H.A., and Utari, D. (2020). "The level of individual participation of community in implementing effective solid waste management policies," Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 6, 341-354.
  4. Cheng, H., and Hu, Y. (2010)." Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: Current and future practices in China," Bioresour. Technol., 101, 3816-3824.
  5. Chong, T.L., Matsufuji, Y., and Hassan M.N. (2005). "Implementation of the semi-aerobic landfill system (Fukuoka method) in developing countries: A Malaysia cost analysis," Waste Management, 25, 702-711.
  6. Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I., and Gastaldi M. (2014). "Sustainable management of waste-to-energy facilities," Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 33, 719-728.
  7. Demirarslan, K.O., and Çelik, B.Y. (2018). Urban solid waste characterization in the east part of Black Sea region, Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 4, 167-182.
  8. Gwada, B., Ogendi, G., Makindi, S.M., and Trott S. (2019). "Composition of plastic waste discarded by households and its management approaches," Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5, 83-94.
  9. Kaza, S., Yao, L.C., Bhada-Tata, P., Van and Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, Urban Development Series, World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
  10. Komilis, D.P., and Ham, R.K. (2004). "Life-cycle inventory of municipal solid waste and yard waste windrow composting in the United States," J. Environ. Eng., 130, 1390-1400.
  11. Łęgowik-Świącik, S. (2019). "The strategy of sustainable development and waste management: Case study: Commercial power industry," Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5, 33-40.
  12. Limon, M.R., and Villarino, C.B.J. (2020). "Knowledge, attitudes and practices on household food waste: Bases for formulation of a recycling system," Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 6, 323-340.
  13. Lu, C. (1996). "A model of leaching behaviour from MSW incinerator residue landfills," Waste Manage. Res., 14, 51-70.
  14. Makarichi, L., Jutidamrongphan, W., and Techato, K.A. (2018). "The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: A review," Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 91, 812-821.
  15. ESDM, (2015). Waste to Energy Guidebook. Kementerian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources), Jakarta, Indonesia, Available Online at: http://ebtke.esdm.go.id/post/2020/03/13/2506/waste.to.energy.-.guidebook
  16. Otoo, M., and Drechsel, P. (2018). Resource recovery from waste: business models for energy, nutrient and water reuse in low-and middle-income countries, Routledge – Earthscan, United Kingdom, 816.
  17. Prihandoko, D., Budiman, A., Fandeli, C., and Setyono, P. (2019). "Alternative of Waste Treatment Technology Based on Economic Development and Waste Composition in TPST Piyungan Yogyakarta," AIP Conference Proceedings, 2202.
  18. Prihandoko, D., Budiman, A., Fandeli, C., and Setyono, P. (2020). "A New Paradigm for Solid Waste Management in Integrated Waste Management Site Piyungan Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, 898, 51-57.
  19. Putra, H.P., Damanhuri, E., and Marzuko, A. (2018). "The concept of "Loop Cycle" in landfill management (Case study at Piyungan landfill, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," MATEC Web of Conferences, 154, 02003
  20. Putra, H.P., Damanhuri, E., and Sembiring, E. (2018). “Integration of formal and informal sector (waste bank) in waste management system in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” MATEC Web of Conferences, 154, 02007.
  21. Rahim, I.R., Nakayama, H., and Shimaoka, T. (2012). "Cost analysis of municipal solid waste management in major Indonesian cities," Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 68, II_79-II_88.
  22. Sudibyo, H., Majid, A.I., Pradana, Y.S., Budhijanto, W., and Budiman, A. (2016). "Technological evaluation of municipal solid waste management system in Indonesia," Energy Procedia, 105, 263-269.
  23. Sudibyo, H., Pradana, Y.S., Budiman, A., and Budhijanto, W. (2017). "Municipal Solid Waste Management in Indonesia - A Study about Selection of Proper Solid Waste Reduction Method in D.I. Yogyakarta Province,” Energy Procedia, 143, 494-499.
  24. Tsai, W.T. (2019). "An Analysis of Operational Efficiencies in the Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Plants of Kaohsiung Municipality (Taiwan)," Resources, 8, 125.
  25. Tsunatu, D.Y., Tickson, T.S., Sam, K.D., and Namo, J.M. (2015). "Municipal solid waste as alternative source of energy generation: a case study of Jalingo Metropolis–Taraba State," IJET, 5, 185-193.
  26. Worrell, W.A., and Vesilind, P.A. (2012). Solid Waste Engineering. Second edition. Cengage Learning. USA.
  27. Zhao, X.G., Jiang, G.W., Li, A., and Wang, L. (2016). "Economic analysis of waste-to-energy industry in China," Waste management, 48, 604-618.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.64496

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3506 | views : 3981

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering  (print ISSN 1655-4418; online ISSN 2655-5409) is published by Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada.