Heat Exchanger Network (HEN) Analysis of The Power Plant Industry Using Aspen Energy Analyzer Software

Maktum Muharja; Arief Widjaja; Rizki Fitria Darmayanti; Bramantyo Airlangga; Rendra Panca Anugraha; Mar'atul Fauziyah; Eko Wijanarto; Mohammad Sholehuddin; Achri Isnan Khamil

doi:10.22146/ajche.72261

Heat Exchanger Network (HEN) Analysis of The Power Plant Industry Using Aspen Energy Analyzer Software

https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.72261

Maktum Muharja⁽¹⁾, Arief Widjaja⁽²⁾, Rizki Fitria Darmayanti^(3*), Bramantyo Airlangga⁽⁴⁾, Rendra Panca Anugraha⁽⁵⁾, Mar'atul Fauziyah⁽⁶⁾, Eko Wijanarto⁽⁷⁾, Mohammad Sholehuddin⁽⁸⁾, Achri Isnan Khamil⁽⁹⁾

(1) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(4) Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
(5) Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
(6) Department of Chemical Engineering, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
(7) PT Pembangkitan Jawa Bali, Paiton Generation Unit, Indonesia
(8) PT Pembangkitan Jawa Bali, Paiton Generation Unit, Indonesia
(9) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Heat recovery is considered as the key to improve energy efficiency in the process design. An appropriate heat exchanger network (HEN) design is an effective tool to maximize heat recovery from the process streams and to minimize energy consumption. The objectives of this study were arranging optimum HEN based on the annual cost in the power industry. HEN in the Paiton Steam Power Plant, East Java, Indonesia, was designed using spreadsheet and Aspen Energy Analyzer with Peng-Robinson equation. Pinch analysis was conducted by comparing T_min (10°C - 19°C) to obtain Maximum Energy Recovery (MER) and Heat Exchanger Area (HEA). The HEN design was optimized using grid diagram. Simulation in this study succeeded to reduce the annual cost the most effectively at ∆T_min 16°C. This design optimized the process integration and contributed to the capital, operation, and total annual cost reduction of 14.3%. The maximum energy recovery was 286,706 kW and HEA 138.790 m². This result is a solution for Steam Power Plant as an effort for enhancing energy efficiency and the company competitiveness.

Keywords

Aspen energy analyzer; Heat exchanger network; Maximum Energy Recovery; Power plant industry

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akpomiemie, M.O., and Smith, R., 2018. “Cost-effective strategy for heat exchanger network retrofit.” Energy 146, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.005

Di Pretoro, A., and Manenti, F., 2020. “Pinch Technology. In: Non-conventional Unit Operations,” in: Non-Conventional Unit Operations. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham., pp. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34572-3_1

El-darwish, I., and Gomaa, M., 2020. “Retrofitting strategy for building envelopes to achieve energy efficiency.” Alexandria Eng. J. 56, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.05.011

Fleiter, T., Fehrenbach, D., Worrell, E., and Eichhammer, W., 2012. “Energy efficiency in the German pulp and paper industry–A model-based assessment of saving potentials.” Energy 40, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.025

Goodarzvand-Chegini, F., and GhasemiKafrudi, E., 2017. “Application of exergy analysis to improve the heat integration efficiency in a hydrocracking process.” Energy Environ. 28, 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0958305X17715767

Hassan, H., Ahmed, M.S., and Fathy, M., 2019. “Experimental work on the effect of saline water medium on the performance of solar still with tracked parabolic trough collector (TPTC).” Renew. Energy 135, 136–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.112

Kang, L., and Liu, Y., 2019. “Synthesis of flexible heat exchanger networks: A review.” Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 27, 1485–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.09.015

Karimi, H., Ahmadi-Danesh-Ashtiani, H., and Aghanajafi, C., 2019. “Applying multiple decomposition methods and optimization techniques for achieving optimal cost in mixed materials heat exchanger networks.” Int. J. Energy Res. 43, 3711–3722. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4526

Klemeš, J.J., Wang, Q.-W., Varbanov, P.S., Zeng, M., Chin, H.H., Lal, N.S., Li, N.-Q., Wang, B., Wang, X.-C., and Walmsley, T.G., 2020. “Heat transfer enhancement, intensifica-tion and optimisation in heat exchanger network retrofit and operation.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 120, 109644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109644

Lai, Y.Q., Alwi, S.R.W., and Manan, Z.A., 2019. “Customised retrofit of heat exchanger network combining area distribution and targeted investment.” Energy 179, 1054–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy. 2019.05.047

Mrayed, S., Shams, M. Bin, Al-Khayyat, M., and Alnoaimi, N., 2021. “Application of pinch analysis to improve the heat integration efficiency in a crude distillation unit.” Clean. Eng. Technol. 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100168

Muharja, M., Darmayanti, R.F., Fachri, B.A., Palupi, B., Rahmawati, I., Putri, D.K.Y., Amini, H.W., Setiawan, F.A., Asrofi, M., Widjaja, A., and Halim, A., 2023. “Biobutanol Production from Cocoa Pod Husk Through a Sequential Green Method: Depectination, Delignification, Enzymatic Hydrolysis, and Extractive Fermentation.” Bioresour. Technol. Reports 21, 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biteb.2022.101298

Muharja, M., Darmayanti, R.F., Palupi, B., Rahmawati, I., Fachri, B.A., Setiawan, F.A., Amini, H.W., Rizkiana, M.F., Rahmawati, A., Susanti, A., and Putri, D.K.Y., 2021. “Optimization of microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment for enhancement of delignification process of cocoa pod husk.” Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 16, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.9767/BCREC. 16.1.8872.31-43

Muharja, M., Fadhilah, N., Darmayanti, R.F., Sangian, H.F., Nurtono, T., and Widjaja, A., 2020a. “Effect of severity factor on the subcritical water and enzymatic hydrolysis of coconut husk for reducing sugar production.” Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 15, 786–797. https://doi.org/10.9767/ BCREC.15.3.8870.786-797

Muharja, M., Fadhilah, N., Nurtono, T., and Widjaja, A., 2020b. “Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of coconut husk using nitrogen-assisted subcritical water for sugar production.” Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 15, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.9767/ bcrec.15.1.5337.84-95

Muharja, M., Junianti, F., Ranggina, D., Nurtono, T., and Widjaja, A., 2018. “An integrated green process: Subcritical water, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation, for biohydrogen production from coconut husk.” Bioresour. Technol. 249, 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.024

Muharja, M., Umam, D.K., Pertiwi, D., Zuhdan, J., Nurtono, T., and Widjaja, A., 2019. “Enhancement of sugar production from coconut husk based on the impact of the combination of surfactant-assisted subcritical water and enzymatic hydrolysis.” Bioresour. Technol. 274, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.074

Njoku, H.O., Egbuhuzor, L.C., Eke, M.N., Enibe, S.O., and Akinlabi, E.A., 2019. “Combined pinch and exergy evaluation for fault analysis in a steam power plant heat exchanger network.” J. Energy Resour. Technol. 141. https://doi.org/10.1115/ 1.4043746

Ogbonnaya, B.U., Azeez, O.S., Akande, H.F., and Muzenda, E., 2021. “Investigation of loops and paths as optimization tools for total annual cost in heat exchanger networks.” Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 12, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-020-00374-w

Seader, J.D., Seider, W.D., and Lewin, D.R., 2016. Product and process design principles: synthesis, analysis and evaluation. Wiley.

Smith, R., 2005. Chemical process: design and integration. John Wiley & Sons.

Taher Al-Mayyahi, M.A., Albadran, F.A., and Fares, M.N., 2019. “Retrofitting design of heat exchanger networks using supply-target diagram.” Chem. Eng. Trans. 75, 625–630. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1975105

Walmsley, T.G., Lal, N.S., Varbanov, P.S., and Klemeš, J.J., 2018. “Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks.” Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 12, 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2

Wang, B., Klemeš, J.J., Li, N., Zeng, M., Varbanov, P.S., and Liang, Y., 2021a. “Heat exchanger network retrofit with heat exchanger and material type selection: A review and a novel method.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110479. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rser.2020.110479

Wang, B., Klemeš, J.J., Varbanov, P.S., and Liang, Y., 2021b. “A New Diagram for Long-term Heat Exchanger Network Cleaning and Retrofit Planning.” Chem. Eng. Trans. 86, 919–924. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186154

Wang, B., Klemeš, J.J., Varbanov, P.S., and Zeng, M., 2020. “An extended grid diagram for heat exchanger network retrofit considering heat exchanger types.” Energies 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ en13102656

Zamora, J.M., Hidalgo-Muñoz, M.G., Pedroza-Robles, L.E., and Núñez-Serna, R.I., 2020. “Optimization and utilities relocation approach for the improvement of heat exchanger network designs.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 156, 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.024

Żymełka, P., Żyrkowski, M., and Bujalski, M., 2018. “Analysis of Coal-Fired Power Unit Operation in Reduced Minimum Safe Load Regime,” in: Thermal Power Plants - New Trends and Recent Developments. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72954

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.72261