Pelatihan dan Pembelajaran Metode Riset Aksi Partisipatoris Untuk Pemajuan Kebudayaan

https://doi.org/10.22146/bb.41091

Paschalis Maria Laksono(1*)

(1) Departemen Amtropologi, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Sumba as one of the 3T (Tertinggal/Disadvantaged, Terdepan/frontmost, Terluar/Outermost)
regions in Indonesia has a crisis of acculturation in its development, where local customs and
culture are no longer able to meet the demands of renewal of the development. Many scholars have
conducted research and studies on Sumba and meanwhile, not a few Sumba people go outside Sumba
to study and are expected to bring change to the land of Sumba. However, the crisis still occurs.
Community Action Plans (CAP) are a way for the community to participate in the development.
What is often questioned is the quality of the CAP itself which was conceived as a bottom-up effort
in the development. Anthropology with its ethnographic methods and holistic participatory research
methods can enrich the CAP to structure it to be more qualifed by considering the principles of
cultural advancement.
Tis training and learning of participatory action research methods offer a way to explore sociocultural capitals as the identity of the community to adjust to the changing times that occur through
development. Te Sumba student community who are studying in Yogyakarta and its surroundings
are invited to play a role through the training and learning of the CAP-based culture promotion
method so that they are expected to become pioneers in the development of Sumba culture through
active community participation in Sumba. In addition, the Sumba community is expected to change
as the times progress towards a more prosperous world without leaving their identity as Sumba people.


Keywords


Community Action Plans, Sumba Community, socio-cultural capitals

Full Text:

PDF


References

Dewantara, Ki Hadjar. 1994. Bagian Kedua: Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.

Geertz, Clifford. 1992. Tafsir Kebudayaan (terj). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Koentjaraningrat. 1959. Metode2 Anthropologi dalam Penjelidikan2 Masjarakat dan Kebudajaan di Indonesia. Djakarta: Penerbitan Universitas.

_____________. 1980. Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Dian Rakyat.

_____________. 1985. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Laksono, P.M. 2009. “Peta Jalan Antropologi Indonesia Abad Dua Puluh Satu: Memahami Invisibilitas (Budaya) di Era Globalisasi Kapital”, Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Ilmu Budaya UGM, diucapkan di depan rapat terbuka Majelis Guru Besar UGM, 27 Oktober 2009 di Yogyakarta.

___________. 2014. “Pendidikan dan Pengelolaan Kebudayaan” dalam Teori, Etnograf, dan Refleksi. Heddy Shri Ahimsa-Putra (ed.). Yogyakarta: Jurusan Antropologi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya dan Pintal.

Laksono, P.M. dkk. 2015. Antropologi Pendidikan, Aneh: Biasanya Tidak Apa-Apa. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Antropologi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada dan Kepel Press.

Tim LAURA (Laboratorium Antropologi Untuk Riset dan Aksi) FIB UGM. 2013. Modul Community Action Plan (CAP) Untuk Pendidikan Berkualitas di Nusa Tenggara Timur.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bb.41091

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 737 | views : 2133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Bakti Budaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2655-9846 (Online)


-Bakti Budaya's Statistic