Penerapan Open Science di Indonesia agar riset lebih terbuka, mudah Diakses, dan Meningkatkan Dampak Saintifik

https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.17054

Dasapta Erwin Irawan(1*), Cut Novianti Rachmi(2), Hendy Irawan(3), Juneman Abraham(4), Kustiati Kusno(5), Mochammad Tanzil Multazam(6), KeuKeu Kaniawati Rosada(7), Septriono Hari Nugroho(8), Galih Kusumah(9), Defny Holidin(10), Nurhazman Abdul Aziz(11)

(1) Institut Teknologi Bandung
(2) Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead (University of Sydney Clinical School), Sydney, NSW, Australia
(3) School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Institut Teknologi Bandung
(4) Bina Nusantara University
(5) Universitas Tanjungpura
(6) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
(7) Universitas Padjadjaran
(8) Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
(9) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(10) FISIP Universitas Indonesia
(11) Springer Nature Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


A significant development of open science movement has been witnessed in the last five years. This could bring a fresh start to Indonesian academia.

The objective of this paper is to showcase the advancement of open science concept and implementation that can be adopted to increase impact. We did a literature review on peer-reviewed papers, websites of funding agency, open science blogs, and threads on Twitter.

We believe the values of research output are not limited to a paper in a high reputation journal. Data is now considered as separate output, as well as, data management protocols, and laboratory notebooks. Publishing research results as a preprint is also used to disseminate findings as rapid and as fast as possible. Post publication peer-review is also added to the reviewing system to add openness, transparency, and objectivity. It offers credit to the reviewers. We also see the growth of impact indicators as the results of San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) statutory. More initiatives and technologies have been introduced to make science more open, transparent, and inclusive.

With so many developments have been made, therefore it’s not wise for Indonesian academia to rely themselves only to the old perception of research outputs and impact indicators.  


Keywords


Open Science; Open Access; Open Data; Open Source; Open Review

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adler, R., Ewing, J., and Taylor, P. (2009). Citation Statistics: A Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in Cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS), Statistical Science, 2009, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1–14, DOI: 10.1214/09-STS285.                                                         

Amin, M. and Mabe, M. (2000).  IMPACT FACTORS: USE AND ABUSE, Perspectives in Publishing Newsletter, No 1, Elsevier, Science, url: http://www.iuma.ulpgc.es/~nunez/doctorado0910/impactfactor.pdf, Retrieved 30 November 2016.

Amin, M., and Mabe, M. (2003). Impact factors: use and abuse, Editorial, MEDICINA (Buenos Aires) 2003; 63: 347-354, url: http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v63n4/v63n4a11.pdf, Retrieved 30 November 2016.

Austin, C., Brown, S., Fong, N., Humphrey, C., Leahey, A., and Webster, P. (2015). Research Data Repositories: Review of current features, gap analysis, and recommendations for minimum requirements, Journal of IASSIST Quarterly, url: https://www.rdc-drc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Review-of-Research-Data-Repositories-2015.pdf, Retrieved 17 April 2016.

DOAR (2016). The Directory of Open Access Repositories – OpenDOAR. url: http://www.opendoar.org/, Retrieved 17 April 2016.

Ekmekcioglu, C. (2016). Understanding and overcoming challenges to sharing personal and sensitive data. Recon. Figshare. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3466727.v1 Retrieved: 15 Nov 11, 2016.

FOSTER, Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research, url: https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/, Retrieved: 15 December 2016.

Howard, A. (2012). Data for the public good, url: http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/02/data-public-good.html, Retrieved November 11, 2016.

Horizon 2020, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), url: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation, Retrieved: 15 November 2016.

Irawan, DE. (2016)a. Promoting open science: The state of open data initiatives, PAAI Conference 17 Nov 2016, Open Science Framework, url: http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V64TF, Retrieved November 2016.

Irawan, DE. (2016)c. Membuat data geosains lebih dapat dibagi (shareable) dan dirujuk (citeable), Bersains, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Online: Apr 2016), url: https://bersains.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/bersains-vol-2-04-data-repository.pdf.

Irawan, DE. and Putranto, TT. (2016)b. Hydrochemical assessment of Semarang area using multivariate statistics: A sample based dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2016-29, 2nd round review, 2016.

Irawan, DE. and Rachmi, CN. (2016)d. Social media: the more we share the more we learn, Authorea-Reddit-TheWinnower essay competition, url: https://www.authorea.com/users/87737/articles/131825/_show_article, Retrieved November 2016.

Irawan, DE., Suwarman, R., Ulfa, N., Irsyad, M., and Fadli, N. (2016)e. Groundwater open data system of Bandung city. Open Science Framework. url: http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TMJXZ, Retrieved November 2016.

Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research (JCQAR) (2008). Citation Statistics, A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS), url: http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf, Retrieved: 30 November 2016.

McKiernan, E. (2016)a. What is open science and why should I care?. figshare. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4033482.v1 . Retrieved: 09 35, Oct 24, 2016 (GMT).

Mckiernan, E. (2016)b. Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed, url: https://elifesciences.org/content/5/e16800, Retrieved November 2016.

Mounce, R. and Rozenberga, D. (2015). The How, When, Where, and Why of Open Data. FOSTER Open Science event for Open Access week 2015. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32436.

Noorden, R.V. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, Nature News Blog, url: http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711, Retrieved 17 April 2016.

Open Knowledge International (2010). Open data handbook, url: http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/why-open-data/, Retrieved November 11, 2016.

Open Science and Research Initiatives (2016). Open science and research handbook, url: Download Open Science and Research Handbook v.1.0 in pdf format, Retrieved November 2016.

RCUK (2015). RCUK Common Principles on Data Policy. url: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy/, Retrieved 15 November 2016.

Steel G, Price A, Seth B, Biswas R, and Chatterjee P. (2016) Charity is welcome: The international benefits and pitfalls of peer Review. PeerJ PrePrints 4:e1585v2. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1585v2. Retrieved 15 December 2016.         

Tennant, J. (2017). Should we cite preprints?, url: http://fossilsandshit.com/should-we-cite-preprints/, Retrieved 17 May 2017.

Tennant, J., & Mounce, R. (2015). Open Research Glossary. Figshare. url: http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1482094. Retrieved November 2016.

Tennant, JP., Waldner, F., Jacques, DC., Masuzzo, P., Collister, LB., Hartgerink, CHJ. (2016):. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review, F1000Research Journal, url: https://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v1, Retrieved November 2016.

Tennison, J. (2015). Why is open data a public good? url: https://theodi.org/blog/why-is-open-data-a-public-good, Retrieved November 2016.

Weingart, S. (2015). Submission to DH2016, url: http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL.1.html, Retrieved 15 November 2016.

Wikipedia Online Glossary, url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science, Retrieved 15 December 2016.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.17054

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 5055 | views : 2983

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.