Analisis sitiran skripsi Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya tahun 2015-2017
Dwi Eliana(1), Muhammad Rosyihan Hendrawan(2*)
(1) Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction. This paper investigate the research behaviour in Undergraduate Program of Library Science Faculty of Administrative Science Universitas Brawijaya.
Data Collection Method. This research uses descriptive methods with quantitative approach through documentation and observation for data collection, a number of ninety-four undergraduate theses are explained in this study.
Data Analysis. Data analysis used in this study is descriptive statistical analysis.
Results and Discussion. This study has several result: 1) The characteristics of literature based on form type is book which most often used with 6.074 times (66,8%), after that, literature in print is most frequently cited literature with the 8.236 times (90,6%), then literature in Indonesian probably cited with the 8.116 times (88,25%), the amount of 6.617 times (73,3%) use literature from 0 to 10 years.2) Author that probably cited was Sugiyono with 542 times (6,91%). 3) half life of literature is 10 years.
Conclusions. Based of the findings, the research behaviour was defined, so the provided suggestion for collection developmet and weeding policies in the the university library, also for administrators of education in the faculty to provide more control over policies in terms of citation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alderman, J. (2014). Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Diakses 28 April 2019, dari https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=bliss.
Arao, L. H., Veloso, M. J., Santos, C., Vânia, E., Da, L., & Guedes, S. (2015). The half-life and obsolescence of the literature science area: a contribution to the understanding the chronology of citations in academic activity. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 4, 603–610.
Bohannon, J. (2013). The secret half-lives of scientific papers. Diakses 28 April 2019, dari http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/12/secret-half-lives-scientific-papers.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran edisi keempat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Darmawan, D. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya. 2012. Pedoman penyusunan dan ujian skripsi Program Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya Malang 2012/2013. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya.
Guninda, Zakaria, R., & Christiani, L. (2015). Analisis sitiran jurnal pada skripsi mahasiswa Jurusan Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 4(2), 39-45.
Hartinah, S. (2002). Analisis sitiran (citation analysis). Depok: Masyarakat Informetrika Indonesia.
Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
Hasugian, J. (2016). Analisis penggunaan sumber daya informasi tercetak dan elektronik di Perpustakaan Universitas Sumatera Utara. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Diambil dari http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/64518
Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia nomor 06/E/2013 tentang kode etika peneliti. Diambil 1 Mei 2019, dari http://pusbindiklat.lipi.go.id/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=48 Mairaj, M. I., & Naseer, M. M. (2013). Library services and user satisfaction in developing countries: a case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 30(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12038
Michael, L. C., &, & C., T. M. (2013). ALA glossary of library and information science, fourth edition. Chicago: ALA.
Mustafa, B. (2010). Obsolescence: mengenal konsep keusangan literatur dalam dunia kepustakawanan. Diakses 1 Mei 2019, dari http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/32139
Mutaqin, D., Z. (2015). Buku panduan penyusunan skripsi edisi 1 cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Putri, Y. R., Ana I., A. T. K. (2016). Analisis sitiran pada skripsi bertopik perpustakaan sekolah di Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro (FIB UNDIP) tahun 2011-2014. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 5(2), 361-370.
Rosenberg, Z. (2015). Citation analysis of M.A. Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations in Sociology and Anthropology: An assessment of library resource usage. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.010
Rubin, R. E. (2016). Foundation of library and information science. United States of America: American Library Association.
Sangam, S. L. & S. M. (2013). Obsolescence of literature in the field of Psychology. Scientometrics, 44(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458476
Smith, S. (2017). An introduction to bibliometrics and citation analysis. Diakses 1 Mei 2019 dari https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/media/departmental/informationservices/pdf/intro-bibliometrics1711.pdf.
Sopari, M., & Christiani, L. (2016). Karakteristik dan keusangan literatur : suatu kajian bibliometrik pada Skripsi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro tahun 2015. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 5(4), 231–240.
Sutardji. (2011). Kajian artikel tanaman pangan pada Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 20(0341), 1–9.
Wallace, D. P. & Fleet, C. V. (2012). Knowledge into action: research and evaluation in library and information science. California: ABC-CLIO.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.38264
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 7566 | views : 6544Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.