Mempertahankan keaslian arsip elektronik di era digital berdasarkan tinjauan literatur sistematis

https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.47370

Muhamad Idris Marbawi(1*), Tamara Adriani Salim(2)

(1) Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Introduction. This research aimed to understand efforts should be taken so that the authenticity of electronic records can be maintained in the digital environment.

Data Collection Method. This research used a systematic literature review published by scientific journals from January 2010 to April 2019 derived from electronic information sources subscribed by the University of Indonesia Library. The results of this review are reported using guidelines for Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which has three stages, namely planning, implementation, and reporting.

Analysis Data. Descriptive quantitative was employed to analyze the data by using simple statistic application (Microsoft Office Excel 2007).

Results and Discussion. The results indicated that there are 18 literatures (3%) of the total search results of 561 relevant literatures discussing electronic records and ways to maintain their authenticity in digital era. There were 12 articles providing sufficient information about this matter.

Conclusion. The majority of the articles mentioned that to maintain the authenticity of electronic archives in digital era must be supported by policy makers such as the government. In addition, the knowledge and skills of archival managers, as well as appropriate technology are also needed.


Keywords


Authenticity of archives; archives; electronic records; digital era; archive management

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adam, S. (2010). Preserving authenticity in the digital age. Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 595-604.

Adrian, C., Abdullah, R., Atan, R., & Jusoh, Y. Y. (2016). Towards developing strategic assessment model for big data implementation: A systematic literature review. International journal of advances in soft computing and its applications, 8(3), 173-192.

Bunakov, V., Jones, C., Matthews, B., & Wilson, M. (2014). Data authenticity and data value in policy-driven digital collections. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 30(4), 212-231.

Burnhill, P. (2013). Tales from the keepers registry: Serial issues about archiving & the web. Serials Review, 39(1), 3-20.

Cohen, F. B. (2015). Digital diplomatics and forensics: Going forward on a global basis. Records Management Journal, 25(1), 21-44.

Duranti, L. (2011). Educating for trust. Arch Sci, 11, 373–390.

Duranti, L., & Jansen, A. (2013). Records in the cloud: Authenticity and jurisdiction. Digital Heritage International Congress (Digita lHeritage), 161-164.

Evans, J., Reed, B., & Linger, H. (2014). Winds of change: A recordkeeping informatics approach to information management needs in data-driven research environments. Records Management Journal, 24(3), 205-223.

Evans, M. R. (2015). Modern special collections: Embracing the future while taking care of the past. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(2), 116-128.

Garcia, C., Davila, A., & Pessoa, M. (2014). Test process models: Systematic literature review. In A. Mitasiunas, T. Rout, R. O’Connor, & A. Dorling, Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science. New York: Springer.

Goldman, B., & Pyatt, T. D. (2013). Security without obscurity: Managing personally identifiable information in born-digital archives. Library & Archival Security, 26(1-2), 37-55.

Grant, R. (2017). Recordkeeping and research data management: a review of perspectives. Records Management Journal, 27(2), 159-174.

Kemoni, H. N. (2009). Management of electronic records: Review of empirical studies from the Eastern, Southern Africa Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives (ESARBICA) region. Records Management Journal, 19(3), 190-203.

Khabsa, M., & Giles, C. L. (2014). The number of scholarly documents on the public web. PLoS One, 9(5), 39-49.

Kominfo. (2019). Kominfo Beberkan Sederet Kasus Hoax di WhatsApp. Retrieved 20 October 2019 from Kominfo: https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/16023/kominfo-beberkan-sederet-kasus-hoax-di-whatsapp/0/sorotan_media

Latham, K. F. (2010). Medium Rare: Exploring archives and their conversion from original to digital (Part One). LIBRES Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 20(2), 1-14.

Luciana, D. (2010). The long-term preservation of the digital heritage: A case study of universities institutional repositories. Journal of Library and Information Sciences, 1(1), 157–168.

merriam-webster. (2019). merriam-webster. Diakses 20 Agustus, 2019, dari https://www.merriam-webster.com/

Mosweu, O., & Ngoepe, M. (2019). Skills and competencies for authenticating digital records to support audit process in Botswana public sector. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 29(1), 17-28.

OAIS. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Washington, DC: Magenta Book, Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems.

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1–51.

Ormond-Parker, L., & Sloggett, R. (2012). Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science, 12, 191–212.

Pertiwi, W. K. (2019). Cara Kirim Foto di WhatsApp Tanpa Menurunkan Kualitas. Retrieved 24 July 2019 from tekno.kompas.com:

 https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2019/07/24/10150007/cara-kirim-foto-di-whatsapp-tanpa-menurunkan-kualitas

Petticrew, M., & Roberts., H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.

Pinnick, J. (2017). Exploring digital preservation requirements. Records Management Journal, 27(2), 175-191.

Price, D. M., & Smith, J. J. (2011). The trust continuum in the information age: A Canadian perspective. Arch Sci, 11, 253–276.

Rogers, C. (2016). A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems from ‘machine-readable’ to records in the cloud. Acervo, Rio de Janeiro, 29(2), 16-44.

Sabharwal, A. (2017). Digital humanities and the emerging framework for digital curation. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 238-256.

Shaikh, M., Salleh, N., & Marziana, L. (2015). Social networks event mining: A systematic literature review. In A. Abraham, A. Muda, & Y. Choo, Pattern Analysis, Intelligent Security and the Internet of Things. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. New York: Springer.

Tammaro, A. M. (2016). Heritage Curation in the Digital Age: Professional Challenges and Opportunities. International Information & Library Review, 48(2), 122-128.

Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Journal of The Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57-59.

Van Bussel, G.-J. (2012). Reconstructing the Past for Organizational Accountability. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 15(1), 127-137.

Wei, G., Fang, Y., Pan, W., & Dekun, L. (2016). Archives as a trusted third party in maintaining and preserving digital records in the cloud environment. Records Management Journal, 26(2), 170-184.

Zhu, Y. (2017). Authenticity and Heritage Conservation in China: Translation, Interpretation, Practices. In G. N. In: Weiler K., Authenticity in Architectural Heritage Conservation. Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context (pp. 187-200). Switzerland: Springer.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.47370

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 807 | views : 1356

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.