Kepatuhan dan ketegasan pegawai negeri pada peraturan daerah bebas rokok: studi komparatif di kabupaten Sleman dan Kulon Progo

https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.25927

Israini Susanti(1*), Yayi Suryo Prabandari(2)

(1) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Civil servant compliance and assertiveness to non-smoking areas regulation: a comparative study in Sleman and Kulon Progo Regencies

Purpose:

his study aimed to determine the differences of compliance and civil servants on the applica­tion of non-smoking areas in Sleman and Kulon Progo.

Methods

This analytical survey study used a cross-sectional approach. The subjects of this research were civil servants in the regional work units of Kulon Progo Regency as many as 1,072 and Sleman as many as 2,300 employees at 26 SKPD in Sleman and 25 SKPD in Kulon Progo. The sampling technique used multistage random sampling. The research instruments used were question­naires, observations, and interviews to support the research. The analysis used was independent t-test and Mann-Whitney tests, namely to determine whether there was a relationship between independent and dependent variables.

Results

This study found a differ­ence of knowledge on application of perda KTR with (p = 0.000), attitude with (p = 0.003) and there was difference of socialization to applying of regulation of non-smoking area (p = 0.000). Logistic regression tests showed that the dominant factor of the non-smoking area law was the knowledge.

Conclusion

There was a difference of knowledge, attitude, and socialization among civil servants in Kulon Progo and Sleman. There was no significant difference in attitude, smoking status, compliance, assertive­ness, accessibility and social environment among civil servants in Kulon Progo and Sleman districts. The dominant factor affecting the compliance and assertive­ness of civil servants is knowledge.


Keywords


civil servant; smoking; non-smoking areas; compliance; assertiveness

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Rizkiani M, Widyastuti RH. Hubungan antara stress dengan perilaku merokok pada pegawai negeri sipil laki-laki. Jurnal Keperawatan Diponegoro. 2012;1(1):132-9.
  2. Cho YS, Kim HR, Myong JP, Kim HW. Association between work conditions and smoking in South Korea. Safety and health at work. 2013 Dec 1;4(4):197-200.
  3. Kemenkes RI. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Pedoman Pengembangan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Jakarta: Pusat Promosi Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan RI;2011
  4. Zablocki RW, Edland SD, Myers MG, Strong DR, Hofstetter CR, Al-Delaimy WK. Smoking ban policies and their influence on smoking behaviors among current California smokers: a population-based study. Preventive medicine. 2014 Feb 1;59:73-8.
  5. Lee JT, Glantz SA, Millett C. Effect of smoke-free legislation on adult smoking behaviour in England in the 18 months following implementation. PloS one. 2011 Jun 15;6(6):e20933.
  6. Riyanto A. Aplikasi metodologi penelitian kesehatan;2011.
  7. Astuti PA, Ked S, ASTUTI PA. Progress on Compliance to Smoke Free Law in Bali-What Makes the Difference.
  8. Devhy NL. Pengaruh Faktor Pengelola terhadap Kepatuhan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Daerah tentang Kawasan tanpa Rokok pada Hotel Berbintang di Kabupaten Badung.
  9. Shelley D, Fahs MC, Yerneni R, Qu J, Burton D. Correlates of household smoking bans among Chinese Americans. Nicotine & tobacco research. 2006 Feb 1;8(1):103-12.
  10. Parks T, Wilson CV, Turner K, Chin JW. Failure of hospital employees to comply with smoke-free policy is associated with nicotine dependence and motives for smoking: a descriptive cross-sectional study at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec;9(1):238.
  11. Hidayati T, Arikensiwi E. Persepsi dan Perilaku Merokok Siswa, Guru dan Karyawan Madrasah. Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. 2016 Feb 1;12(1):31-40.
  12. Aspropoulos E, Lazuras L, Rodafinos A, Eiser JR. Can you please put it out? Predicting non-smokers' assertiveness intentions at work. Tobacco control. 2010 Apr 1;19(2):148-52.
  13. Harry Indradjit Soeharjono. Pengaruh Budaya Birokrasi Ewuh-Pakewuh Terhadap Efektivitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern. Disertasi. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada;2013.
  14. Aherrera A, Çarkoğlu A, Hayran M, Ergör G, Ergüder T, Kaplan B, Susan J, Zheng L, Cohen JE, Navas-Acien A. Factors that influence attitude and enforcement of the smoke-free law in Turkey: a survey of hospitality venue owners and employees. Tobacco control. 2016 Sep 30:tobaccocontrol-2016.
  15. Barnoya J, Monzon JC, Briz P, Navas-Acien A. Compliance to the smoke-free law in Guatemala 5-years after implementation. BMC public health. 2016 Dec;16(1):318.
  16. Azkha N. Studi efektivitas penerapan kebijakan perda kota tentang kawasan tanpa rokok (ktr) dalam upaya menurunkan perokok aktif di Sumatera Barat tahun 2013.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.25927

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1142 | views : 688

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).

Indexed by:


Web
Analytics Visitor Counter