* Corresponding Author
Hide
Show all
Analisis Gap Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem E-Learning di Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor
https://doi.org/10.22146/ijeis.72631 Ritzkal Ritzkal(1*), R. Fitria Rachmawati(2)
(1) Universitas Ibn Khaldun, Bogor
(2) Universitas Ibn Khaldun, Bogor
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
A GAP analysis has been conducted on the evaluation of E-Learning systems of LMS UIKA Bogor. Five (5) subjects of discussion in this study, namely include Structured Learning Methods, Unstructured Learning Methods, Population and Samples, E-learning User Activity Record, Evaluation of Results. Process of evaluating the results of a calculation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Judging from usability or usefulness the e-learning system is feasible. With the following details: a. Based on acceptability ranges, the e-learning falls into the accepted category, b. Based on the grade scale, included in grade C where the SUS score produced is 79, c. Based on adjective ratings, the value is between a score of 70-80 which means it falls into the range of good categories. The results of the usability evaluation of LMS UIKA Bogor products stated that overall, were acceptable or feasible.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
[1] J. L. Moore, C. Dickson-Deane, and K. Galyen, “E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?,” Internet High. Educ., 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001.
[2] I. P. Ramayasa, “Evaluation Model of Success and Acceptance of E-Learning,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 3182, no. 3, pp. 282–289, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol82No3/16Vol82No3.pdf.
[3] D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 102, pp. 67–86, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.
[4] Mauladi, Rizqa Raaiqa Bintana, Benedika Ferdian Hutabarat. Analisis Gap Pada Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Elektronik Terstruktur dan Tidak Terstruktur Untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Keberhasilan Penyampaian Materi Kuliah Kepada Mahasiswa. JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) Vol. 9 , No. 2 , April 2021.
[5] Sidik, Abdurrahman. Penggunaan System Usability Scale (SUS) Sebagai Evaluasi Website Berita Mobile. Technologia” Vol 9, No.2, April – Juni 2018.
[6] Brooke, John. 1996.“SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale”. Redhatch Consulting Ltd.,12 Beaconsfield Way,Earley, Reading Rg6 2ux,United Kingdom.
[7] Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.
[8] Kaban, Ekklesioga., Candra Brata, Komang., Hendra Brata, Adam., “Evaluasi Usability Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (SUS) Dan Discovery Prototyping Pada Aplikasi PLN Mobile (Studi Kasus PT. PLN)”, Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, Vol. 4, No. 10, Oktober 2020, hlm. 3281-3290.
[9] Martoyo, Wildan Usama., Falahah., Kajian Evaluasi Usability dan Utility pada Situs Web, Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Indonesia, 2-3 November 2015.
[10] Brooke, J., 1986, "SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale," [Online]. Available: http://cui.unige.ch/isi/icle[1]wiki/_media/ipm:ujiant-suschapt.pdf. [Accessed July 2015].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijeis.72631
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 633
| 
views : 848
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJEIS (Indonesian Journal of Electronics and Instrumentation Systems)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats1