ANALISIS GAP EVALUASI KUALITAS SISTEM E-LEARNING DI UNIVERSITAS IBN KHALDUN BOGOR

Ritzkal Ritzkal(1*), R. Fitria Rachmawati(2)
(1) Universitas Ibn Khaldun
(2) Universitas Ibn Khaldun
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
A GAP analysis has been conducted on the evaluation of E-Learning systems. Three (5) subjects of discussion in this study, namely include Structured Learning Methods, Unstructured Learning Methods, Population and Samples, E-learning User Activity Record, Evaluation of Results. In the process of evaluating the results of a calculation of the System Usability Scale (SUS). Judging from usability or usefulness can be received well or in other words the e-learning system is feasible. With the following details: a. Based on acceptability ranges, the value falls into the accepted category, b. Based on the grade scale, included in grade C where the SUS score produced is 79, c. Based on adjective ratings, the value is between a score of 70-80 which means it falls into the range of good categories.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
J. L. Moore, C. Dickson-Deane, and K. Galyen, “E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?,” Internet High. Educ., 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001.
I. P. Ramayasa, “Evaluation Model of Success and Acceptance of E-Learning,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 3182, no. 3, pp. 282–289, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol82No3/16Vol82No3.pdf.
D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 102, pp. 67–86, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.
Mauladi, Rizqa Raaiqa Bintana, Benedika Ferdian Hutabarat. Analisis Gap Pada Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Elektronik Terstruktur dan Tidak Terstruktur Untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Keberhasilan Penyampaian Materi Kuliah Kepada Mahasiswa. JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) Vol. 9 , No. 2 , April 2021.
R. E. Mayer, “Using multimedia for e-learning,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2017, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12197.
Brooke, John. 1996.“SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale”. Redhatch Consulting Ltd.,12 Beaconsfield Way,Earley, Reading Rg6 2ux,United Kingdom.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.
Clark, Ruth Colvin & Richard E. Mayer. (2011). E-learning and the Science of Instruction. Third Edition. San Francisco: Pfeiffer

Article Metrics


Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 IJEIS (Indonesian Journal of Electronics and Instrumentation Systems)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats1