Comparison of Electrical Conductivity Prediction Models Using Gaussian Process

Zaenuri Putro Utomo(1*), Indriana Hidayah(2), Muhammad Nur Rizal(3)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author


People living in coastal areas use clean water sourced from groundwater to support the household, agricultural, and industrial needs. However, human activities and natural factors can lead to a common problem in coastal areas, namely seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion can be detected using water quality data. Today, one of the challenges in water resources management is the prediction of water quality parameters such as total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), and water turbidity. Incomplete EC data and limitations of direct measurements can affect the analysis. Machine learning models are known to provide the most accurate predictions. This research used EC parameter data to investigate the performance of algorithms, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), Gaussian processes (GP), and multiple regression (MLR). The prediction used seven hydrochemical parameters (K, Ca, Mg, Na, SO4, Cl, HCO3) and three physical parameters of groundwater (TDS, pH, EC). Performance measurement used R-squared (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The testing showed the MLR model had R2 of 0.985 and RMSE of 0.030, which were slightly better than other models. Hence, it can be concluded that the MLR model can be a solution to difficult problems of EC prediction and incomplete data in the water resources management.


Prediction;Electrical Conductivity;Water Quality;Groundwater.

Full Text:



R.R. Sigit (2013) “Tahun 2020, Pemerintah Targetkan 20 juta Hektar Kawasan Konservasi Perairan dan Laut,” [Online],, access date: Apr. 7, 2021.

C. Sivapragasam, V. Jegatheesan, V.M. Arun, and S. Vanitha, “Spatial Modeling of Electrical Conductivity with Neural Network,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 3128–3136, 2010.

T.T. Putranto and T.R. Rüde, “Hydrogeological Model of an Urban City In a Coastal Area, Case Study: Semarang, Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 17–27, Apr. 2016.

N.A. Memon, M.A. Unar, A.K. Ansari, G.B. Khaskheli, and B.A. Memon, “Predictive Potentiality of Artificial Neural Networks for predicting the Electrical Conductivity (EC) of Drinking Water of Hyderabad City,” ICCOMP’08: Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Computers, 2008, pp. 487–490.

T.E. Keskin, E. Özler, E. Şander, M. Düğenci, and M.Y. Ahmed, “Prediction of Electrical Conductivity Using ANN and MLR: a Case Study from Turkey,” Acta Geophysica, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 811–820, Jun. 2020.

D.T. Bui, K. Khosravi, M. Karimi, G. Busico, et al., “Enhancing Nitrate and Strontium Concentration Prediction in Groundwater by Using New Data Mining Algorithm,” Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 715, pp. 1–13, May 2020.

M.A. Ghorbani, M.T. Aalami, and L. Naghipour, “Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Electrical Conductivity Modeling in Asi River,” Applied Water Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1761–1772, Jul. 2017.

I. Ahmadianfar, M. Jamei, and X. Chu, “A Novel Hybrid Wavelet-Locally Weighted Linear Regression ( W-LWLR ) Model for Electrical Conductivity (EC) Prediction in Surface Water,” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol. 232, pp. 1–17, Jun. 2020.

Friends of Groundwater, “Assessing Groundwater Quality: A Global Perspective: Importance, Methods and Potential Data Sources,” World Water Quality Alliance, Nairobi, Kenya, Report, 2021.

R.S.B. Waspodo, S. Kusumarini, and V.A.K. Dewi, “Prediksi Intrusi Air Laut Berdasarkan Nilai Daya Hantar Listrik dan Total Dissolved Solid di Kabupaten Tangerang Prediction,” Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 234–303, Dec. 2019.

B. Tutmez, Z. Hatipoglu, and U. Kaymak, “Modelling Electrical Conductivity of Groundwater Using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System,” Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 421–433, May 2006.

C. Mattas, L. Dimitraki, P. Georgiou, and P. Venetsanou, “Use of Factor Analysis (FA), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) for Electrical Conductivity Prediction in Aquifers in the Gallikos River Basin, Northern Greece,” Hydrology, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1–,14 Sep. 2021.

G.S. Bhunia, A. Keshavarzi, P.K. Shit, E.-S.E. Omran, and A. Bagherzadeh, “Evaluation of Groundwater Quality and Its Suitability for Drinking and Irrigation Using GIS and Geostatistics Techniques in Semiarid Region of Neyshabur, Iran,” Applied Water Science, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 1–16, Oct. 2018.

T.E. Keskin and E. Özler, “Heavy Metal Contamination in Groundwater and Surface Water due to Active Pb-Zn-Cu Mine Tails and Water-Rock Interactions: A Case Study from the Küre Mine Area (Turkey),” Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 878–895, Nov. 2020.

Groundwater and Surface Water Sample Locations Included in Hydrochemical Cluster Analysis, Geological and Bioregional Assessment Program, May 2020, [Online],, access date: Dec. 18, 2020.

A.J. Smola and P. Bartlett, “Sparse Greedy Gaussian Process Regression,” NIPS’00: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000, pp. 598–604.

K.P. Murphy, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. London, UK: The MIT Press, 2012.


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 250 | views : 139


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 IJITEE (International Journal of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN  : 2550-0554 (online)

Contact :

Department of Electrical engineering and Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Jl. Grafika No 2 Kampus UGM Yogyakarta

+62 (274) 552305

Email :