Genetic Parameter Estimation on Pra Production Traits of Alabio and Mojosari Ducks After Selection Based on Egg Production in Two Generation
Jafendi Hasoloan Purba Sidadolog(1*), Isti Damayanti(2), Tohir Tohir(3), Dyah Maharani(4), Tety Hartatik(5)
(1) Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(2) Balai Penelitian Ternak Unggul Itik (BPTU-ITIK) Pelaihari, Kalimantan Selatan
(3) Balai Penelitian Ternak Unggul Itik (BPTU-ITIK) Pelaihari, Kalimantan Selatan
(4) Faculty of Animal Science UGM
(5) Faculty of Animal Science UGM
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to analyze the genetics parameter of preproduction traits of Alabio and Mojosari Ducks after two generation selection for laying line. Alabio and Mojosari Ducks were selected 20 males and 200 females, respectively, as twice generation and placed in group mating for egg production. All collected eggs were hatched to find about 450 of Alabio and 520 of Mojosari female ducklings. All birds were individually identification, based of group lines mating of the pwerents. Ducklings were rewered and weight two weekly interval of 16 weeks and old of sexual maturities. Data were collected followed on half- and full-sib nested design. Collected data were egg weight, body weight of day, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 weeks old ducks, sexual maturity and age of sexual maturity. Estimated genetic parameter of heritability (h²±sh²) was estimated based on variance components of half-sib and full sib. The result showed that on half sib estimation of the h²±sh² of body weight and age of sexual maturity of Alabio (0.89 ± 0.26 and 0.35 ± 0.20) was higher than Mojosari (0.48 ± 0.21and 0.59 ± 0.23 ducks. On full sib estimation, Alabio also had a higher h²±sh² on body weight of sexual maturity (0.88 ± 0.32) than Mojosari (0.45 ± 0.16 ), but lower on age of sexual maturity, 0.28 ± 0.25 and 0.59 ± 0.16,respectively. On egg and body weight of dod, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks of age, shown that h²±sh² on half sib estimation of Alabio were 1.07±0.28, 0.47±0.22, 0.24±0.18, 0.25±0.20, 0.49±0.22, 0.44±0.22, 0.02±0.12 0.42±0.21, 0.43±0.21 and 0.55±0.23 compared to Mojosari 0.84±0.25, 0.41±0.20, 0.08±0.14, 0.63±0.25, 0.25±0.18, 0.10±0.17, 0.04±0.13, 0.11±0.15, 0.03±0.12 and 0.15±0.15, respectively. On full sib estimation of h²±sh² of Alabio, respectively were 0.81±0.36, 0.18±0.19, 0.27±0.13, 0.52±0.29, 0.32±0.20, 0.48±0.20, -0.04±0.07, 0.29±0.18, 0.24±0.18 and 0.36±0.22 its lower compwered to Mojosari, respectively, 0.85±0.30, 0.31±0.17, 0.14±0.07, 0.28±0.30, 0.23±0.13, 0.12±0.11, 0.05±0.06, 0.09±0.09, 0.001±0.06 and 0.13±0.10.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract views : 497 | views : 401Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.