Repairing and Retrofitting of Earthquake-Affected Exterior Beam-Column Connection by Using Resin Concrete

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.27150

Rifqi Anra Wijaya(1*), Ashar Saputra(2)

(1) 
(2) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Reinforced concrete structures may suffer a failure that caused by natural events such as earthquake. If the damaged building still can be used, then a repair (retrofitting) on the damaged section is highly necessary. Retrofitting materials that can be used is the polymer concrete. The purpose of this study was to determine the behavior of beam-column connections after repair (retrofitting) using polymer concrete. Test sample in the form of exterior beam-column connection with cross-sectional size of the column 30 x 30 cm, length of 3.5 m and the size of the beam cross-section of 17 x 30 cm, length 1.8 m, consists of 3 pieces. Experiment test method was based on ACI T1.1-01. All samples were tested in two stages, the first stage of the test until targeted damaged level which controlled by crack width of 0.4 mm. Furthermore, the test object repaired using normal concrete (BKN- 1N) and polymer concrete (BKN-2R and BKN-3R). The second phase of test is done to collapse. Lateral force, deflection, and strain and crack pattern are observed. The data were processed to obtain the load-deflection relationship curve, stiffness, ductility ratio, energy dissipation and model of collapse. Beam-column joint behavior is compared with the acceptance criteria (ACI T1.1-01) to determine whether in accordance with the criteria required. Test results showed the value of the maximum lateral load test object BKN-1N, BKN-2R and BKN-3R,consecutively were 39.2 kN; 43.77 kN and 46.24 kN in the direction of curvature response (+) and the direction of curvature response (-), respectively for 59.1 kN; 62.73 kN and 69.91 kN. BKN-2R test objects have a greater ductility factor of 24.1% in the direction of curvature response (+) when compared with the test object BKN-1N. At the direction of curvature response (-), BKN-2R sample has a greater ductility 39.3% of the sample BKN-1N. Based on ACI T1.1-01, all samples have the response modification factor of 8. From SAP2000 modeling, BKN-1N, BKN-2R, and BKN-3R consecutively showed ability to withstand earthquake forces 3.36 times greater; 3.77 times; and 3.97 times greater than the earthquake forces are designed based on SNI 1726:2012. An advantage of using a resin concrete repair materials is very fast drying time.


Keywords


Keywords: resin concrete, earthquake, repair, retrofitting, beam-column connection

Full Text:

PDF


References

ACI, 2001. Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Test. American Concrete Institute, pp. T1.1-01.

Fakhruddin, 2013. Perbaikan dan Perkuatan Geser Balok dengan Beton Resin Poliester (Polyester Resin Concrete) [Repairing and Strengthening of Shear Beam with Polyester Resin Concrete] Yogyakarta: Tesis Pascasarjana Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Imran, I. & Hendrik, F., 2010. Perencanaan Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Tahan Gempa[Planning of Reinforcement Concrete Structures]. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.

Jamshidi, M. & Pourkhorshidi, A. R., 2010. A Comparative Study on Physical/Mechanical Properties of Polymer Concrete and Portland Cement Concrete. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing), 11(4), pp. 421-432.

Paz, M., 2007. Dinamika Struktur, Teori dan Perhitungan [Structure Dynamics, Theory and Calculation]. 2 ed. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Suhendro, B., 2012. Metode Retrofitting, Bahan Ajar Program Pascasarjana Teknik Sipil [Retrofitting Method, Course Material, Postgraduate Program, Civil Engineering]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Triwiyono, A., 2000. Bahan Ajar Perbaikan dan Perkuatan Bangunan Beton , Program Pascasarjana [Course Material Repairing and Strengthening Concrete Building, Postgraduate Program] Yogyakarta: UGM.

Tsonos, A. G., 1999. Lateral Load Respons of Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column. ACI Structural, Volume January-February, pp. 46-56.

Widodo, 2001. Respon Dinamik Struktur Elastik [Dynamics Respon of Elastic Structure]. Yogyakarta: UII Pers.

Wijaya, R. A., 2015. Perbaikan Dan Perkuatan Sambungan Balok Kolom Eksterior Yang Rusak Menggunakan Beton Resin [Retrofitting and Reinforcement of Exterior Beam and Column uding Concrete Resin], Master Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

 



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.27150

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1097 | views : 1279

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum


The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN 5249-5925 (online) | ISSN 2581-1037 (print)
Jl. Grafika No.2 Kampus UGM, Yogyakarta 55281
Email : jcef.ft@ugm.ac.id
Web Analytics JCEF Stats