Public Policy Implementation As Political Clientelism: The Double Edge of The Smart Indonesian Card (KIP Kuliah) Program in West Sulawesi

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.103192

A. Mappatunru(1*), Sriwiyata Ismail Zainuddin(2)

(1) Universitas Sulawesi Barat
(2) Universitas Sulawesi Barat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


In post-authoritarian Indonesia, the open-list proportional electoral system affords incumbent legislative candidates the opportunity to appropriate state budgetary patronage resources for personal, particularly electoral, objectives. This system reorients the primary focus of patronage politics from a party-voter dynamic to a candidate-voter relationship, thereby establishing informal networks as central to patronage distribution. This research investigates how an incumbent legislative candidate leverages informal networks to exert control over state policies, thereby redirecting the implementation of the Kartu Indonesia Pintar program toward clientelistic ends. Employing a qualitative case study with an explanatory orientation, the study draws upon interviews with beneficiaries, party administrators, and campaign teams, supplemented by documentary evidence from social media and online reports. The findings indicate that the implementation of the KIP Kuliah program has become a political arena where Fem-01 transcends her formal legislative authority, effectively acting as a de facto policy implementer. Through a shadow bureaucracy, Fem-01 mobilizes informal networks to capture the program’s implementation and cultivate long-term clientelistic ties with beneficiaries. Conceptually, this study contributes to the discourse on money politics by introducing the notion of ‘disguised money politics,’ defined as a subtle form of vote purchasing facilitated through state-funded welfare programs. The findings underscore how democratization has blurred the demarcation between bureaucratic procedures and informal politics, highlighting that policy implementation itself constitutes a political act extending beyond formal institutions.

Keywords


clientelism; implementation; informal politics; public policy

Full Text:

PDF


References

Anderson, J. E. . (2011). Public policymaking : an introduction. Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Aspinall, E. (2013). Popular Agency and Interests in Indonesia’s Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Indonesia, 96, 101. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0011

Aspinall, E. (2014). When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2020). Democracy for Sale: Pemilu, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Aspinall, E., & Hicken, A. (2020). Guns for hire and enduring machines: clientelism beyond parties in Indonesia and the Philippines. Democratization, 27(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1590816

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Patronage and clientelism in Indonesian electoral politics. In Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots (pp. 1–38). NUS Press Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1xxzz2

Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., Hicken, A., & Hutchcroft, P. D. (2022). Mobilizing for Elections. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009075015

Asshiddiqqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara (Jilid II). Sekertariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahakamah Konstitusi RI. www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id

Bardach, E. (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. The MIT Press.

Batubara, B., Guntoro, Rachman, N. F., Herlily, & Adianto, J. (2024). Land Occupation, Re-occupation, and Housing Cooperative: Commune Formation by Jakarta’s Urban Poor. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A Triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES, 13(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760241226816

Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756

Berenschot, W. (2019). Informal democratization: brokers, access to public services and democratic accountability in Indonesia and India. Democratization, 26(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1512590

Finan, F., & Schechter, L. (2012). Vote-Buying and Reciprocity. Econometrica, 80(2), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9035

Gerring, J. (2017). Case Study Research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2022). Lokalisasi Kekuasaan di Indonesia Pasca Otoritarianisme. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508

Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., & Muhtadi, B. (2022). Buying Brokers. World Politics, 74(1), 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887121000216

Hidayat, S. (2007). ‘Shadow State’?: Business and politics in the province of Banten. In Renegotiating Boundaries (pp. 203–224). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260436_010

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy. Sage Publications.

Isra, S. (2022). Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, Wewenang, dan Dinamika Konstitusional. Rajawali Press.

Liddle, R. W. (1988). Indonesia in 1987: The New Order at the Height of Its Power. Asian Survey, 28(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644819

Lipsky, M. (2010). Sreet-Level Bureaucracy: Dillemas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Mares, I., & Young, L. (2016). Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060514-120923

Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi’s Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia.

Mouffe, C. (2020). Populisme Kiri (M. Zaenuri, Trans.). Antinomi.

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Politik uang dan new normal dalam pemilu paska-orde baru. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 05(1).

Muhtadi, B. (2021). Kuasa Uang: Politik Uang dalam Pemilu Pasca Orde Baru. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Muhtadi, B. (2023). Votes for Sale: Klientelisme, Defisit Demokrasi, dan Institusi. UIN Syarif HIdayatullah.

Neuman, L. W. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif (7th ed.). Indeks.

Nichter, S. (2011). Electoral Clientelism or Relational Clientelism? Healthcare and Sterilization in Brazil. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1919567

Nichter, S. (2018). Votes for survival: Relational clientelism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

Nichter, S., & Peress, M. (2017). Request Fulfilling: When Citizens Demand Clientelist Benefits. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1086–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666838

Novianto, A. (2024). Good or Bad Governance for Whom? Governance is a Trojan Horse for Capital Expansion in Pati, Indonesia. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 28(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.89148

Sari, L., Aspinall, E., M, H., & Armunanto, A. A. (2023). Parties, Patronage and COVID-19 Vaccination Distribution in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs45-1a

Savirani, A., & Aspinall, E. (2017). Adversarial Linkages: The Urban Poor and Electoral Politics in Jakarta. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(3), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600301

Schaffer, C. F., & Schedler, A. (2007). What Is Vote Buying? In Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280

Simandjuntak, D. (2012). Gifts and Promises: Patronage Democracy in a Decentralised Indonesia. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-20120008

Stokes, S. C. (2011). Political Clientelism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0031

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., & Nazareno, M. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.103192

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3626 | views : 1390

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.