When Bureaucracy Fails Democracy: Explaining the Institutional Barriers to Electoral Inclusion in Remote Island Regions

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.107939

Baharudin Hamzah(1*), Aloysius Liliweri(2), Laurensius Petrus Sayrani(3), Rudi Rohi(4)

(1) Doctoral Program of Administrative Science, Faculty of Social and Politics, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang-Indonesia
(2) University of Nusa Cendana
(3) University of Nusa Cendana
(4) University of Nusa Cendana
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Despite extensive democratic reforms and administrative decentralization, Indonesia continues to struggle with persistent voter exclusion in its remote island regions. Existing studies often attribute this issue to technical or logistical limitations, overlooking the bureaucratic and institutional roots of the problem. This study addresses that gap by examining how bureaucratic design and institutional misalignment contribute to the reproduction of electoral exclusion within decentralized yet fragmented administrative systems. Focusing on Flores Timur, an archipelagic district in East Nusa Tenggara, this research employs a qualitative case study approach, utilizing 28 in-depth interviews with election officials, civil registry staff, and local stakeholders, supported by document analysis. Findings reveal that voter exclusion from the Daftar Pemilih Tetap (Final Voter List) is structurally embedded, stemming from the institutional disconnect between the Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) and the Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil (Disdukcapil). The absence of a shared, binding data system has created what this study terms an administrative blind spot. In this zone, no agency fully claims responsibility for data accuracy, resulting in passive but recurring disenfranchisement. The study’s novelty lies in theorizing latent disenfranchisement, a form of exclusion produced not by intent but by bureaucratic rigidity, fragmented accountability, and non-interoperable systems. Extending the concept of bureaucratic disenfranchisement, the study offers new insights and policy recommendations for inclusive, coordinated electoral reform.

Keywords


Electoral exclusion; Bureaucratic disenfranchisement; Institutional fragmentation; Remote-island governance; Latent disenfranchisement

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abbas, S. (2021). Data disharmony and electoral administration in Eastern Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesian Electoral Governance Institute. Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Berenschot, W. (2018). The political economy of citizenship in Indonesia: Informality, brokerage, and the state. In L. Pal & M. Painter (Eds.), Public administration in Southeast Asia (pp. 173–196). Routledge. Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2020). Patterns of citizenship and exclusion in contemporary Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 24(5), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784643 Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing public accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x Bovens, M., & 't Hart, P. (2016). Understanding accountability failures in public governance. In M. Lodge & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The problem-solving capacity of the modern state (pp. 215–246). Oxford University Press. Buehler, M. (2013). Electoral rules, constitutional structures, and the quality of local democracy in Indonesia. Asian Survey, 53(3), 515–542. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2013.53.3.515 Caiden, F. (1971). The dynamics of public administration: Guidelines to current transformations in theory and practice. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press. Caiden, F., & Wildavsky, A. (1974). Planning and budgeting in poor countries. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Chiroro, B. (2016). Bureaucracy and democracy: An African perspective. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 10(1), 1–11. Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? (pp. 75–91). Zed Books. Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. P. (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed Books. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x Gaventa, J. (2006). Triumph, deficit or contestation? Deepening the ‘deepening democracy’ debate. IDS Working Paper, 264. Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(s1), s3–s28. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton University Press. Grizzle, C. (2016). Administrative capacity and democratic participation: A comparative analysis of electoral governance in Latin America. Public Administration and Development, 36(4), 205–217. Grizzle, C. (2019). Managing electoral governance: Lessons from comparative public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(10), 845–857. Haryanto, Y. (2021). Masalah-masalah pencatatan pemilih dan dampaknya terhadap kualitas demokrasi lokal. Jakarta: Pustaka Pemilu Indonesia. James, T. S. (2012). Elite statecraft and election administration: Bending the rules of the game? Palgrave Macmillan. IDEA. (2019). International IDEA handbook on electoral management design. Stockholm: International IDEA. Ibrahim, J. (2021). Electoral inclusion and administrative reform in rural Nigeria. African Journal of Public Administration, 14(2), 45–64. Komnas HAM. (2020). Laporan investigatif tentang pelanggaran hak politik dalam penyusunan daftar pemilih tetap (DPT). Jakarta: Komnas HAM Republik Indonesia. Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mietzner, M. (2012). Indonesia's democratic stagnation: Anti-reformist elites and resilient civil society. Democratization, 19(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620 Moehler, D. (2010). Democracy, governance and randomized development assistance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628(1), 30–46. Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. New York: Cambridge University Press. Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1–24. Peters, B. G. (2010). The politics of bureaucracy: An introduction to comparative public administration (6th ed.). New York: Routledge. Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination. University Press of Kansas. Prasetyo, D. P., & Rohi, R. (2022). Electoral governance in Eastern Indonesia: Between administrative dysfunction and democratic resilience. Journal of Electoral Studies Indonesia, 6(2), 91–109. Pratikno. (2012). Electoral governance in decentralizing Indonesia: Political dynamics and institutional constraints. In E. Aspinall & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratisation in Indonesia (pp. 130–149). Singapore: ISEAS. Rai, A. (2018). Voter registration and exclusion in rural India: A field study. India Electoral Studies, 4(1), 57–74. Rohi, R. (2022). Disenfranchised periphery: Electoral management in NTT. Kupang: Lembaga Demokrasi Timur. Rüland, J. (2022). Democratizing decentralized governance: The case of Indonesia. Cham: Springer Nature. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. Shair-Rosenfield, S., & Aspinall, E. (2011). Indonesia’s local elections: The mechanics of democracy. Singapore: ISEAS. Sidel, J. T. (2014). Achieving reforms in decentralization: The Philippine and Indonesian experience. Comparative Politics, 46(3), 313–331. Sihombing, S. O. (2020). Penguatan sistem pemutakhiran daftar pemilih nasional. Jakarta: Puskapol UI. Sihombing, S. O., & Paramaditha, I. (2020). Gendered disenfranchisement: Electoral exclusions of women and mobile citizens in Indonesia. Jurnal Politik, 6(1), 33–55. Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. World Bank. (2019). Improving voter registration in rural Indonesia: Policy review and field insights. Jakarta: World Bank Indonesia Office. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The new ambiguity of ‘open government’. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 59, 178–208.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.107939

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 686 | views : 589

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.