Situated Environmental Justice: Theorizing Distributional Inequity in Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects (PSN)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.114218

Abdul Kodir(1*)

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article develops a situated theorization of Environmental Justice (EJ) grounded in the empirical realities of Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects (Proyek Strategis Nasional/PSN). Drawing on critical policy studies and decolonial scholarship, this study interrogates the limitations of Anglo-American EJ frameworks when applied to developmental state contexts. Through qualitative analysis of PSN governance arrangements, including regulatory frameworks, spatial distribution patterns, and participatory mechanisms, this research identifies three analytical gaps: the assumption of state neutrality, the privileging of technocratic expertise, and the neglect of plural legal orders. The findings reveal that environmental injustice in PSN operates through programmatic rather than project-specific mechanisms, embedded in fast-track regulatory instruments that systematically marginalize affected communities. This article contributes to EJ scholarship by proposing a contextually grounded framework that integrates distributional, procedural, and epistemic dimensions while accounting for the distinctive characteristics of developmental governance in the Global South. The theoretical implications extend beyond Indonesia, offering analytical tools for examining infrastructure-driven development across similar political-economic configurations. Practical recommendations include reforming environmental assessment procedures, strengthening community participation mechanisms, and institutionalizing plural knowledge recognition in project planning.


Keywords


developmental state; environmental justice; Indonesia; national strategic projects; PSN; public policy

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and Directions in Environmental Justice: From Inequity to Everyday Life, Community, and Just Sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052 Airlangga, S. A. (2024). Neoliberalism, Governance, & Capital Accumulation: A Study of Development Debates and Social Dynamics in Indonesia. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 28(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.89592 Álvarez, L., & Coolsaet, B. (2020). Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A Latin American Perspective. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272 Baig, S., Yenigun, C., & Alam, K. M. (2022). Political Capacity and Corruption Nexus: Re-Examining Evidence for Developing Countries. Economies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10060127 Bullard, R. D., & Wright, B. H. (1993). Environmental justice for all: Community perspectives on health and research needs. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379300900508 Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory (Kathy Charmaz, 2006). Slideshare. Cons, J., & Paprocki, K. (2010). Contested credit landscapes: Microcredit, self-help and self-determination in rural Bangladesh. Third World Quarterly, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436591003701141 Cummings, S., Dhewa, C., Kemboi, G., & Young, S. (2023). Doing epistemic justice in sustainable development: Applying the philosophical concept of epistemic injustice to the real world. Sustainable Development, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2497 Cummings, S., Munthali, N., & Sittoni, T. (2025). Epistemic Justice as a “New Normal?” Interrogating the Contributions of Communities of Practice to Decolonization of Knowledge. Sustainable Development, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3285 de Sousa Santos, B. (2023). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. In Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115609925nn Duit, A. (2016). The four faces of the environmental state: environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1077619 Evans, P. (2012). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. In Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077170 Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239 Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. In Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 Ganeri, J. (2019). Epistemic Pluralism: From Systems to Stances. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.34 Hadi, S. P., Hamdani, R. S., & Roziqin, A. (2023). A sustainability review on the Indonesian job creation law. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13431 Hadiz, V. R. (2013). The Rise of Capital and the Necessity of Political Economy. Journal of Contemporary Asia. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.757433 Harruma, I. (2022). Daftar Proyek Strategis Nasional 2020-2024. Kompas.Com News Nasional. Holifield, R. (2012). Environmental Justice as Recognition and Participation in Risk Assessment: Negotiating and Translating Health Risk at a Superfund Site in Indian Country. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.641892 Ikhsan, E. (2022). The Omnibus Law in Indonesia: Assessing Its Consequences on Environmental Sustainability and Land Rights. Journal of Human Security, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2023.19010036 Jakimow, T. (2018). Beyond ‘State Ibuism’: Empowerment Effects in State-led Development in Indonesia. Development and Change, 49(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12374 Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845 Joa, B., Winkel, G., & Primmer, E. (2018). The unknown known – A review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation. Land Use Policy, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.001 Kemenko Perekonomian. (2023). Proyek Strategis Nasional Terus Dilanjutkan untuk Pembangunan Inklusif di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5449/proyek-strategis-nasional-terus-dilanjutkan-untuk-pembangunan-inklusif-di-indonesia KPA. (2023). Catatan akhir tahun 2022: Konflik agraria di era Jokowi. Retrieved from https://kpa.or.id KPPIP. (2023). Laporan semester KPPIP. Komite Percepatan Penyediaan Infrastruktur Prioritas. Retrieved from https://kppip.go.id Kunseler, E. M., & Tuinstra, W. (2017). Navigating the authority paradox: Practising objectivity in environmental expertise. Environmental Science and Policy, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.10.001 Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422370 Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham and London: Duke University Press. LPEM UI. (2025). Balancing Act: Complementary Strategies for Indonesia’s Sustainable Nickel Downstream Industry. Retrieved from https://lpem.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Final_NRGI-Policy-Paper.pdf Marquez, G. P. B., & Olavides, R. D. (2024). Integrating science-based and local ecological knowledge: a case study of mangrove restoration and rehabilitation projects in the Philippines. Disasters, 48(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12630 Martanti, Y. (2022). Penyelesaian Masalah Hukum Terkait Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Percepatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v1i4.72 Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348 Mutolib, A., Huda, U. N., & Fauzia, I. (2024). Community Participation in the Process of Making an Environmental Impact Assessment Associated with Law Number 6 of 2023 Concerning Job Creation. JATISWARA, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v39i3.1146 Noonan, D. S. (2008). Evidence of environmental justice: A critical perspective on the practice of EJ research and lessons for policy design. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00568.x Nulhaqim, S. A., Apsari, N. C., Santoso, M. B., & Putri, N. A. R. (2024). ANALISIS KONFLIK AGRARIA PADA PROYEK STRATEGIS NASIONAL REMPANG ECO CITY DI PULAU REMPANG BATAM. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v6i2.55131 Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00182 Qiao, Y. K., Peng, F. Le, Dong, Y. H., & Lu, C. F. (2024). Planning an adaptive reuse development of underutilized urban underground infrastructures: A case study of Qingdao, China. Underground Space (China), 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2023.05.005 Reed, M. G., & George, C. (2011). Where in the world is environmental justice? Progress in Human Geography, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510388384 Rivera, J. D. (2021). Sacrifice zones: The front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. Community Development, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.2008654 Rutgers, M. R., & Mentzel, M. A. (1999). Scientific expertise and public policy: Resolving paradoxes? Science and Public Policy, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782509 Rychnovská, D., Pasgaard, M., & Berling, T. V. (2017). Science and security expertise: Authority, knowledge, subjectivity. Geoforum, Vol. 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.010 Rykiel, E. J., Berkson, J., Brown, V. A., Krewitt, W., Peters, I., Schwartz, M., … van Latesteijn, H. (2002). Science and decisionmaking. In Understanding and Solving Environmental Problems in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044111-5/50010-x Sari, A. C. F. (2024). Proyek Strategis Nasional Bernama Food Estate: Ancaman Otonomi Petani dan Keragaman Sumber Pangan Lokal di Desa Umbu Mamijuk, Sumba Tengah. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(3). Schlosberg, D. (2003). The Justice of Environmental Justice: Reconciling Equity, Recognition and Participation in a Political Movement. In Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice. Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025 Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. In Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature (Vol. 9780199286294). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2015). Interpretation and Method : Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. In Interpretation and Method. Setiadi, W., Sadiawati, D., Harefa, B., & Simanjuntak, A. A. (2024). The Urgency of Implementing Meaningful Participation in Forming Laws in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 07(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i03-27 Sikor, T., & Newell, P. (2014). Globalizing environmental justice? Geoforum, Vol. 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.009 Szałkiewicz, E., Sucholas, J., & Grygoruk, M. (2020). Feeding the future with the past: Incorporating local ecological knowledge in river restoration. Resources, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/RESOURCES9040047 Tanati, D., & Rongalaha, J. (2025). Settlement of Customary Land Disputes Due to Overlapping Customary Land Releases in Skouw Sae Village Muara Tami District Jayapura City. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 3(01). https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v3i01.1418 Tun, S. K. M. (2011). A Comparative Study of State-Led Development in Myanmar (1988–2010) and Suharto’s Indonesia: An Approach from the Developmental State Theory. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000103 Visvanathan, S. (2006). Alternative Science. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300226 Walker, G. (2012). Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. In Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203610671 Wardana, A. (2022). Geografi Hukum Proyek Strategis Nasional: Studi Kasus Bendungan Bener di Purworejo, Jawa Tengah. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.1-41 Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2022). Epistemic pluralism and the justification of conceptual strategies in science. Theory and Psychology, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211063827 Whyte, K. (2018). Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2018.090109 Whyte, K. (2020). Too late for indigenous climate justice: Ecological and relational tipping points. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.603 Whyte, K. P. (2019). The Dakota Access Pipeline, Environmental Injustice, and US Settler Colonialism. In The Nature of Hope. https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607328483.c015 Wiguna, B. A., & Fiko, G. E. (2024). Post-Political Governance and the Return of the Political: PROPER-rated Geothermal Enterprise, Environmental Problems, and Civil Resistance in Dieng Plateau, Central Java. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 28(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.88506



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.114218

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 8 | views : 3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.