Perbedaan Kebocoran Mikro Resin Komposit Bulkfill Vibrasi Sonic dan Resin Komposit Nanohibrid pada Kavitas Kelas I



Muhammad Syafri(1*), Tunjung Nugraheni(2), Tri Endra Untara(3)

(1) Program Studi Konservasi Gigi Program Pendidikan Dokter Gigi Spesialis FKG UGM
(2) Bagian Konservasi Gigi FLG UGM
(3) Bagian Konservasi Gigi FLG UGM
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Sonicvibration bulkfill and nanohybrid resin composites are resin composites with nano-fillers. The small particles and the big fillerscapacities enable both resin composites having a very small shrinkage value about 1,6%, therefore, they can minimize the microleakage. The aim of this study was to know the microleakge differences of sonicvibration bulkfill and nanohybrid resin composites in class I cavities.       

This study used 14 molar teeth. The teeth were divided in two groups, I and II based on the
restoration techniques. In Group I, a nanohybrid resin composite with an incrementaltechique was applied and in group II, a sonic vibration bulkfill resin composite using the bulkfill technique was applied. Microleakage tests were conducted by soaking the specimens in the solution of methylen blue 2% . The observation of microleakage was done by using a stereo microscope at 100x magnification. The microleakage of the specimens was stated by methylen blue penetration between the restorations and the cavity walls.       

Data obtained were the ratio data and analyzed by using t test. The results showed that there were significant differences between the groups (p = 0,046, p<0,05).       

It was concluded that the microleakage of a nanohybrid resin composite was smaller than a sonic vibration bulkfill resin composite.


Keywords


resin composite, bulkfill, sonicvibration, nanohybrid, microleakage

Full Text:

PDF




Article Metrics

Abstract views : 968 | views : 11700

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi



Currently, Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi dexed by: