PENGARUH KARBAMID PEROKSIDA 10% DAN 20% SEBAGAI BAHAN HOME BLEACHING TERHADAP PERUBAHAN KEKASARAN PERMUKAAN RESIN KOMPOSIT NANOFIL DAN GIOMER
Fakriantu Chaldun Pary(1*), Yulita Kristanti(2), Wignyo Hadriyanto(3)
(1) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(2) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(3) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Home bleaching technique is one of extracoronal bleaching techniques, by applying tooth whitening mate
rial conducted by a patient at home under dentist supervision. The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects
of 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide to surface roughness of nanoftll composite resin and giomer. Thirty cylinder
shaped specimens of nanofill composite resin and giomer, with 5 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness were divided
into 6 groups, each group consisted of 5 specimens. Group IA and IIA were control groups, consisted of nanofill
composite resin and giomer submerged in artificial saliva for 14 days. Group IB and liB were treatment groups, con
sisted of nanoftll composite resin and giomer applied with 10% carbamide peroxide 3 hours/day for 14 days. Group
IC and lIC were treatment groups consisted of nanofill composite resin and giomer applied with 20% carbamide
peroxide 3 hours/day for 14 daysr. Surface roughness of both nanofill composite resin and giomer before and after
treatment were measured using stylus profilometer.
Two-way ANOVA showed surface roughness of nanoftll composite resin and giomer caused by restorative
material types, concentration of carbamide peroxide, and interaction. of restorative materials to concentration of
carbamide peroxide (p<0,05). LSD test showed significant difference between nanofill composite resin groups and
giomer after bleaching process using 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide.
It could be concluded that giomer applied with(20% carbamide peroxide had greatest surface roughness
value, and there was interaction between restorative materials with carbamide peroxide concentration to surface
roughness of nanofill composite resin and giomer.
rial conducted by a patient at home under dentist supervision. The aim of this research is to evaluate the effects
of 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide to surface roughness of nanoftll composite resin and giomer. Thirty cylinder
shaped specimens of nanofill composite resin and giomer, with 5 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness were divided
into 6 groups, each group consisted of 5 specimens. Group IA and IIA were control groups, consisted of nanofill
composite resin and giomer submerged in artificial saliva for 14 days. Group IB and liB were treatment groups, con
sisted of nanoftll composite resin and giomer applied with 10% carbamide peroxide 3 hours/day for 14 days. Group
IC and lIC were treatment groups consisted of nanofill composite resin and giomer applied with 20% carbamide
peroxide 3 hours/day for 14 daysr. Surface roughness of both nanofill composite resin and giomer before and after
treatment were measured using stylus profilometer.
Two-way ANOVA showed surface roughness of nanoftll composite resin and giomer caused by restorative
material types, concentration of carbamide peroxide, and interaction. of restorative materials to concentration of
carbamide peroxide (p<0,05). LSD test showed significant difference between nanofill composite resin groups and
giomer after bleaching process using 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide.
It could be concluded that giomer applied with(20% carbamide peroxide had greatest surface roughness
value, and there was interaction between restorative materials with carbamide peroxide concentration to surface
roughness of nanofill composite resin and giomer.
Keywords
carbamide peroxide, home bleaching, surface roughness, nanofill composite resin, giomer
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract views : 1916 | views : 5593Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi
Currently, Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi dexed by: