PERBANDINGAN DAYA ANTIBAKTERI DISINFEKTAN INSTRUMEN PREPARASI SALURAN AKAR NATRIUM HIPOKLORIT 5,25%, GLUTARALDEHID 2%, DAN DISINFEKTAN BERBAHAN DASAR GLUTARALDEHID TERHADAP Bacillus subtilis
Sartika Putri Utami(1*), Ema Mulyawati(2), Dayinah Harman Soebandi(3)
(1) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(2) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(3) Ilmu Konservasi Gigi
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Aseptic is a principle in dentistry that must be executed in daily practice by cross-infection control such as disinfection of endodontic instruments with high-level disinfectant (HLD). Some types of recognized high-level disinfectants are glutaraldehyde, glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant and sodium hypochlorite. The aim of this study is to compare the antibacterial potential of 5.25%
sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant on B. subtilis.
Agar diffusion method was used in this study with 9 plate of Mueller-Hinton agar which was inoculated with B. subtilis culture McFarland scale 3. Three wells were made in each plate and each of the well was filled with a high-level disinfectant, which were 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant, then incubated and observed and measured its zone of inhibition. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc LSD test.
One-way ANOVA result showed that 5,25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant were influential as root canal preparation instruments disinfectants against B. subtilis. LSD test result showed that there were significant differences between 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite with glutaraldehydebased
disinfectant; between glutaraldehyde 2% with glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant.
The study concluded that 2% glutaraldehyde had the strongest antibacterial potential against B. subtilis, followed by glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant, and the weakest is 5.25% sodium hypochlorite.
sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant on B. subtilis.
Agar diffusion method was used in this study with 9 plate of Mueller-Hinton agar which was inoculated with B. subtilis culture McFarland scale 3. Three wells were made in each plate and each of the well was filled with a high-level disinfectant, which were 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant, then incubated and observed and measured its zone of inhibition. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc LSD test.
One-way ANOVA result showed that 5,25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant were influential as root canal preparation instruments disinfectants against B. subtilis. LSD test result showed that there were significant differences between 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 2% glutaraldehyde, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite with glutaraldehydebased
disinfectant; between glutaraldehyde 2% with glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant.
The study concluded that 2% glutaraldehyde had the strongest antibacterial potential against B. subtilis, followed by glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant, and the weakest is 5.25% sodium hypochlorite.
Keywords
high-level disinfectant (HLD), root canal preparation instruments disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite 5.25%, glutaraldehyde 2%, glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant.
Full Text:
PDFArticle Metrics
Abstract views : 6351 | views : 72126Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi
Currently, Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi dexed by: