Analisis Stakeholder dalam Penanggulangan HIV dan AIDS di Kabupaten Grobogan

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkki.37538

Ratna Kusumasari Purbani(1*), Yodi Mahendradhata(2), Yanri Wijayanti Subronto(3)

(1) Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, FKKMK UGM
(2) Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Departemen Kebijakan dan Manajemen Kesehatan, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


HIV-AIDS is one of the world's health problems. Grobogan regency is one of the districts in Central Java with HIV number 4 and the discovery of new cases of HIV-AIDS number 3 in Central Java by 2015. Until 2017, HIV-AIDS cases are still fluctuating and tend to increase. Efforts were made to garner support and political commitment from the Grobogan Government and other stakeholders. The continuity of the program depends on political commitment and stakeholder policy support in the region. Conducting stakeholder analysis becomes important for the development of future strategic HIV / AIDS prevention plans. Objective this research to describe how local government strategic planning in HIV and AIDS prevention in Grobogan District. This research is descriptive research with qualitative approach. There were 20 informants in the study: Executive and Legislative officials, HIV / AIDS Caring NGO, VCT Clinic, community of PLWHA. The data was collected by observation, in-depth interview, and document review. Local government strategic planning on HIV / AIDS prevention efforts is still in the form of policy agenda and exit strategy. Although all stakeholders agree and support HIV / AIDS prevention efforts, stakeholder involvement in the formulation of policies and programs is lacking. Coordination of health offices with other stakeholders is also not working well, so the program is not integrated. The health department advocacy to local leaders is still weak. Health workers began to be evaluated for their performance, especially at sub-district level. Proposed alternatives to HIV / AIDS prevention budget from village funds. Unintegrated HIV / AIDS prevention efforts by stakeholders show weak communication and coordinative functioning. This problem is mainly caused by the key personnel dealing with reshuffle including the head of the health office in addition to the new bupati also not fully understand the case of HIV-AIDS that occurred.

 



Keywords


Stakeholder; Strategic planning; HIV / AIDS prevention; Grobogan

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Adisasmito, W. 2007. Sistem Kesehatan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

2. Asikin, M. 2001. Stakeholder Participation in SME Policy Design and Implementation (Terjemahan). ADB Technical Assistance, SME Development, State Ministry for Cooperatives and SME, Jakarta.

3. Bryson, J.M. 2011. Strategic Planning For Public and Non Profit Organization; A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organization Achievement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

4. CDC. 2015. HIV Basics, dalam www.cdc.gov (diakses September 2017)

5. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Grobogan, Bidang Pencegahan Penanggulangan Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan (P2PL). 2017. Laporan Kejadian HIV-AIDS di Kabupaten Grobogan.

6. Greenlay, G.E., Foxell, G.R. 1997. “Multiple Stakeholder Orientation in UK Companies and The Implications for Company Performance”. Journal of Management Studies 34 (2): 259-284.

7. Kementerian Kesehatan R.I. 2016. Laporan Situasi Perkembangan HIV-AIDS dan PMS.
Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan.

8. Kementerian Kesehatan R.I. 2011. Promosi Kesehatan di Daerah Bermasalah Kesehatan. Jakarta.

9. Komisi Penanggulangan AIDS. 2015. Strategi dan Rencana Aksi Nasional 2015-2019,
Penanggulangan HIV dan AIDS di Indonesia. Jakarta

10. Komisi Penanggulangan AIDS Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2016. http://www.aidsjateng.or.id/?p=download&j=data (diakses Agustus 2017)

11. Liliweri, A. 2007. Dasar-dasar Komunikasi Kesehatan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.

12. Murti, B., Trisnantoro, L., Probandari, A., Maryanti, Hardianto, D., Hasanbasri, M.,
dan Wisnuputri, T. 2006. Perencanaan dan Penganggaran untuk Investasi Kesehatan di
Tingkat Kabupaten dan Kota, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

13. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2015.

14. Sari, M dan Lele, G. 2017. “Relation among Stakeholders in HIV/AIDS Response: Case
Study Palu Municipality.” Policy and Governance Review : Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2017 (55-68).

15. Schmeer, K. 2001. Policy Toolkit for Strengthening Health Sector Reform, Section 2:
Stakeholder Analysis Guidelines, dalam http://www.lachealthsys.org/documents. (diakses
Februari 2018).



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkki.37538

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 459 | views : 486

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia : JKKI

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia : JKKI [ISSN 2089 2624 (print); ISSN 2620 4703 (online)] is published by Center for Health Policy and Management (CHPM). This website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Built on the Public Knowledge Project's OJS 2.4.8.1.
 Web
Analytics View My Stats