* Corresponding Author
Tantangan Reliabilitas OSINT dalam Intelligence Collection dan Implikasinya terhadap Ketahanan Wilayah Jakarta
https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.117084 Stanislaus Riyanta(1*)
(1) Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Penggunaan Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) dalam pengumpulan intelijen di Indonesia meningkat signifikan, terutama dalam memantau dinamika di Jakarta sebagai pusat saraf nasional. Namun, kualitas dan reliabilitas informasinya menjadi tantangan krusial bagi upaya menjaga Ketahanan Wilayah Jakarta. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tantangan penggunaan OSINT, khususnya terkait reliabilitas dan kredibilitas informasi dalam mendukung keamanan wilayah perkotaan yang kompleks. Melalui survei terhadap 217 profesional intelijen negara yang memiliki pengalaman operasional di wilayah metropolitan, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa OSINT dianggap sangat penting dengan skor 4,35 dari skala 5. Meskipun demikian, terdapat keraguan signifikan mengenai keandalan informasi, di mana rata-rata penilaian berada pada tingkat fairly reliable (C) dan kredibilitas possibly true (3) berdasarkan matriks 6x6 Admiralty System. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa 52% responden memprioritaskan keakuratan data di atas kecepatan pengumpulan, mengingat informasi yang tidak akurat dapat memicu instabilitas di Jakarta yang berdampak langsung pada Ketahanan Nasional. Untuk memperkuat resiliensi wilayah, lembaga intelijen disarankan menerapkan metodologi verifikasi yang lebih ketat melalui standar SANS Institute, mengintegrasikan teknologi analitik canggih, serta meningkatkan kompetensi analis agar OSINT dapat menjadi instrumen deteksi dini yang andal bagi stabilitas ibu kota.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bellaby, R. (2012). What's the harm? The ethics of intelligence collection. Intelligence and National Security, 27(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.621600
Block, L. (2024). The long history of OSINT. Journal of Intelligence History, 23(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/16161262.2023.2224091
Chandler, D. (2020). Security through societal resilience: Contemporary challenges in the Anthropocene. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1659574
Eldridge, C., Hobbs, C., & Moran, M. (2018). Fusing algorithms and analysts: Open-source intelligence in the age of ‘big data’. Intelligence and National Security, 33(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2017.1406677
Fuhlhage, M. (2019). Yankee reporters and southern secrets: Journalism, open source intelligence and the coming of the Civil War. Peter Lang.
Gibson, S. (2004). Open source intelligence. The RUSI Journal, 149(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071840408522977
Hanson, J. M. (2015). The admiralty code: A cognitive tool for self-directed learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 14(1), 97–115.
Hatfield, J. M. (2024). There is no such thing as open source intelligence. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 37(2), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2023.2172367
Helm, P. (2015). Risk and resilience: Strategies for security. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 32(1-2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2015.1023793
Henrico, S., & Putter, D. (2025). Intelligence collection disciplines—A systematic review. Journal of Applied Security Research, 20(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2023.2296765
Irwin, D., & Mandel, D. R. (2019). Improving information evaluation for intelligence production. Intelligence and National Security, 34(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1569343
Mandrick, B., & Smith, B. (2022). Philosophical foundations of intelligence collection and analysis: A defense of ontological realism. Intelligence and National Security, 37(6), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2022.2076330
Miller, S. (2022). National security intelligence activity: A philosophical analysis. Intelligence and National Security, 37(6), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2022.2076329
Monaghan, R. (2019). Loyalist supergrass trials: An opportunity for open source intelligence? Intelligence and National Security, 34(7), 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1646518
Oedewaldt, B. V. (2020). Decline in the United States intelligence community’s nuclear intelligence collection capabilities. Comparative Strategy, 39(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2020.1740570
Pedersen, T., & Jansen, P. T. (2019). Seduced by secrecy – perplexed by complexity: Effects of secret vs open-source on intelligence credibility and analytic confidence. Intelligence and National Security, 34(6), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2019.1628453
Pöhlmann, M. (2005). German intelligence at war, 1914–1918. Journal of Intelligence History, 5(2), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/16161262.2005.10555113
Prior, T., & Hagmann, J. (2014). Measuring resilience: Methodological and political challenges of a trend security concept. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.808686
Prunckun, H. (2019). Methods of inquiry for intelligence analysis (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Pulver, A., & Medina, R. M. (2018). A review of security and privacy concerns in digital intelligence collection. Intelligence and National Security, 33(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2017.1342929
Rolington, A. (2006). Objective intelligence or plausible denial: An open source review of intelligence method and process since 9/11. Intelligence and National Security, 21(5), 738–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684520600957696
SANS Institute. (2024, May 13). Enhance your cyber threat intelligence with the Admiralty System. SANS Blog. https://www.sans.org/blog/enhance-your-cyber-threat-intelligence-with-the-admiralty-system
Saugmann, R. (2019). The civilian’s visual security paradox: How open source intelligence practices create insecurity for civilians in warzones. Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2018.1553700
Shere, A. R. K. (2020). Now you [don’t] see me: How have new legislation and changing public awareness of the UK surveillance state impacted OSINT investigations? Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1832129
Smeets, M. (2020). U.S. cyber strategy of persistent engagement & defend forward: Implications for the alliance and intelligence collection. Intelligence and National Security, 35(3), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2020.1729316
Steele, R. (1990). Intelligence in the 1990’s: Recasting national security in a changing world. American Intelligence Journal, 11(3), 29–36.
Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city? Building Research & Information, 42(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
Walsh, P. F., & Miller, S. (2016). Rethinking 'Five Eyes' security intelligence collection policies and practice post Snowden. Intelligence and National Security, 31(3), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2014.998436
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.117084
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 202
| 
views : 159
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Stanislaus Riyanta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.