Analisis Angka Seksio Caesarea di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta Tahun 2009-2013

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.36192

Netty Katrina Dameria(1*), Djaswadi Dasuki(2), Rukmono Siswishanto(3)

(1) Departemen Obstetri Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan (FKKMK) UGM
(2) Departemen Obstetri Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan (FKKMK) UGM
(3) Departemen Obstetri Ginekologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan (FKKMK) UGM
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section is a procedure to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The caesarean section rate is continuously uprising in the last 3 decades. However, the increasing rate, especially in low risk women, may compromise maternal and perinatal outcome. In 1985, WHO recommended that optimal national caesarean rates should be in the range of 5% to 10% and the rate above 15% might be less benefits. Previous study conducted in DR Sardjito hospital reported caesarean section rate in 1996 was 13.38%, while in 2001 was 18.39%. In national level, based on Indonesia Basic Health Survey 2010, caesarean section rate was 10.8%. Therefore, in this study we analyzed the rate of Caesarean section performed in DR Sardjito hospital, and studied whether the operations occurred in high-risk group or low-risk group.

Objective: To compare the rate of caesarean section between high-risk group and low-risk group in DR Sardjito hospital

Method: Retrospective cohort

Result and Discussion: Participants of this study were 7821 patients undergoing labor at RSUP DR Sardjito in 2009-2013. Among them, 3152 patients underwent caesarean section and 4669 patients underwent vaginal delivery. There was an increasing in the overall caesarean section rate of 38,7% in 2009 to 43% in 2013. T-test found the presence of significant differences between the caesarean section rate of high-risk group and low-risk group in 2009-2013 (p<0.05) with a mean difference was 28.5 (20.2-36.8). Caesarean section rate of high-risk group was significantly higher than the low-risk group (p<0.05).

Conclusion: There was a difference in caesarean section rate of high-risk group compared to low-risk group. Caesarean section rate in high-risk group was significantly higher than in the low-risk group.

Keywords: caesarean section rate, caesarean section, low-risk group, high- risk group


Keywords


caesarean section rate; caesarean section; low-risk group; high- risk group; angka seksio caesarea; seksio caesarea; kelompok risiko rendah; kelompok risiko tinggi

Full Text:

PDF


References

Penn Z, Maghami SG. 2001. Indications for Caesarean Section, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics &Gynaecology, 15:1-11. Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essen B. 2013. Increasing Caesarean Section among LowRisk Group: a Panel Study Classifying Deliveries according to Robson at a University Hospital in Tanzania, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13:107. Denise M, Elliot KM, Dan HM. 2000. The Relationship Between Maternal Age and Uterine Dysfunction: A Continuous Effect throughout Reproductive Life, Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 182:1312-20 Michelle JK, Osterman MHS, Joyce AM. 2013. Changes in Cesarean Delivery rate by Gestasional Age: United States , 1996-2011 ,NCHS Data Brief No. 124 Tamim H, El-Chemaly SY, Nassar AH, Campbell OM, Afamia AK, Khalid AY, 2007. Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women in Beirut: Assessing Predictors in Nine Hospitals for the National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal Network, Birth; 34:14-20 Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. 1997. Anesthesia-Related Deaths During Obstetric Delivery in The United States, 1979-1990, The Journal of The American Society of Anesthesiologists, 86:277-284 Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Krame MS, 2007. Maternal Mortality and Severe Morbidity associated with Low-Risk Planned Cesarean Delivery versus Planned Vaginal Delivery at Term, Canadian Medical Association,176:455-460. Anonim, 2013. Care of Women With Breech Presentation or Previous Caesarean Birth, New England Guidelines Group Bests Practice Evidence Based Guidelines. Barrett JFR, Ritchie WK. 2002. Twin Delivery. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 16: 43-56 Nicholson JM, Cronholm P, Kellar LC, Stenson MH, Macones GA. 2009. The Association between Increased Use of Labor Induction and Reduced rate of Cesarean Delivery, Journal of Women’s Health,Vol 18:11 RCOG Green-top Guideline, 2007. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth, RCOG Green-top Guideline; 45:1-17



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkr.36192

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 957 | views : 888

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi



Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Indexed by:

 



SEKRETARIAT JURNAL KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI
Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM/RS Dr. Sardjito
Jl. Kesehatan No. 1, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
Tlp: (0274) 511329 / Faks: (0274) 544003
Email: jurnal.kesehatanreproduksi@ugm.ac.id
Cp: Dwi Astuti +6281802698043