Malformasi Genital Perempuan: Kasus di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta Tahun 2019

Anis Widyasari(1*), Muhammad Nurhadi Rahman(2), Akbar Novan Dwi Saputra(3), Nuring Pangastuti(4)

(1) Departemen Obgin, FKKMK UGM
(2) Departemen Obgin, FKKMK UGM
(3) Departemen Obgin, FKKMK UGM
(4) Departemen Obgin, FKKMK UGM
(*) Corresponding Author



Reproductive tract malformations are rare in general population but are commonly encountered in women with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Their true prevalence in the general population is not absolutely known mainly owing to methodological bias. Common uterine anomalies are important owing to their impact on fertility, and certain Mullerian malformations are particularly important because they cause serious clinical symptoms and affect woman’s quality of life. Identification of symptoms and timely diagnosis are an important key to the management of these defects. Although MRI being gold standard in delineating uterine anatomy, recent advances in imaging technology, specifically 3-dimensional ultrasound, achieve accurate diagnosis. Surgical management depend on the type of anomaly and its complexity and also involves multiple specialties; thus, patients should be referred to centres with experience in the treatment of complex genital malformations


Determined the description of cases of female genital malformation at Dr. Sardjito Hospital in 2019.


This is descriptive study. The subject in this study were all new patient with female genital malformation at Obgyn Polyclinic Dr. Sardjito Hospital January-December 2019. Obtained  30 cases of female genital malformation.


There is 30 cases of genital malformation in 2019. They were 4-44 years with mode at group 16-20 years. They consist of vaginal and cervicovaginal agenesis 14 cases, Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrom 6 cases, hematometra of hemiuterine 4 cases, Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome 3 cases, imperforate hymen, didelphys uterus and genital ambiguous each 1 case. Five cases of cervicovaginal agenesis have been done sigmoid vaginoplasty, all of them have good sexual function after procedure. One case MRKH syndrome has been done sigmoid vaginoplasty with good sexual function after that. Two cases HWW syndrome have been surgical treatment that are vaginal septectomy and vaginal septectomy with laparascopic cystectomy.


The correct knowledge of embryology of the genitourinary is essential for the understanding, study, diagnosis and management of genital malformations, especially complex ones and those that lead to reproductive problems. Surgical techniques for correcting genital malformations depend on the type of anomaly and complexity.


cervicovaginal agenesis; female genital congenital malformation; HWW syndrome; MRKH syndrome

Full Text:



  1. Kachhawa G, Kriplani A. 2017. Management of Reproductive Tract Anomalies. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 67(3):162–167. DOI 10.1007/s13224-017-1001-8.
  2. Grimbizis FG, Sardol AD, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Schoubroeck DV, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmermann D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, Angelis CD, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis V, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. 2016. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg (2016)13:1–16 DOI 10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1
  3. Chan Y, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine N, and Coomarasamy A. 2011. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 2011; 17(6): 761–771. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr028.
  4. Oppelt P, Have M, Paulsen M, Strissel PL, Strick R, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW. 2007. Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertility and Sterility Vol. 87(2):335 doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1501
  5. Acie´n M, Acie´n P. 2013. Classification of the female genital tract malformations and its embryological origin. Diagnostic and therapeutical considerations. Current Women’s Health Rev 2013a;9:1 –29.
  6. Acien P and Acien M. 2016. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Human Reproduction Update; 22(1):48-69,
  7. Bocca S, Abuhamad A. Use of 3-dimensional sonography to assess uterine anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1–6. 10.
  8. Berger A, Batzer F, Lev-Toaff A.2014. Diagnostic imaging modalities for mullerian anomalies: the case for a new gold standard. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:335–45.
  9. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R.2018. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;29:665–83.
  10. Creighton SM. 2005. Common congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice 5 (2005) 221–226. doi:10.1016/j.rigp.2005.08.001
  11. Heinonen PK. 2016. Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 206 (2016) 141–146.
  12. Grimbizis GF, Campo R. 2010. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertility and Sterility Vol.2(30) 2010. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.030
  13. Theodoros A, Grimbizis GF. 2019. Surgical management of congenital uterine anomalies (including indications and surgical techniques). Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 59 (2019) 66e76.


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 760 | views : 1227


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Indexed by:



Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekologi, FK-KMK, UGM/RS Dr. Sardjito
Jl. Kesehatan No. 1, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281
Tlp: (0274) 511329 / Faks: (0274) 544003
Cp: Dwi Astuti +6281802698043