TRANSFORMATION OF ‘MOOIE INDIË’ VISUAL DISCOURSE THROUGH RADEN SALEH’S PAINTING ‘MERAPI, ERUPTION BY DAY’

https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.104551

Dionisius Krisnambudi(1*), Sri Kusumo Habsari(2), Eva Farhah(3)

(1) Kajian Budaya Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Kajian Budaya Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Kajian Budaya Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examines the transformation of the “beautiful Indies” (mooie Indië) visual discourse through Raden Saleh’s painting “Merapi, Eruption by Day”. The “beautiful Indies” style celebrated an idealized vision of the Dutch East Indies, raising questions about the influence of late-romantic European on Indigenous artists such as Raden Saleh. The research employs a qualitative and interpretive design grounded in Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of structuration. This framework enables a deconstruction of colonial aesthetic orders and the dynamics of symbolic power embedded in the ‘mooie Indië’ tradition. Methodologically, the study integrates heuristic and source criticism to contextualize colonial discourse, and montage analysis to reinterpret art elements of Raden Saleh’s painting, thereby exposing tensions between colonial ideology and artistic agency. Findings reveal that “Merapi, Eruption by Day” both appropriates and subverts the ‘mooie Indië’ aesthetic. Through the lens of Pierre Bourdieu, the painting demonstrates how Raden Saleh’s artistic practice can negotiates structures of domination while asserting symbolic capital for the colonized subject. At the same time, the Mount Merapi motif embodies the romantic sublime, destabilizing orientalist expectations of harmony and exotic natural beauty. Raden Saleh’s work thus transforms the colonial discourse of “the beautiful Indies” into a site of symbolic struggle, where visual strategies articulate resistance and intellectual agency within the colonial field of power.


Keywords


Merapi, Eruption by Day; mooie Indië; Raden Saleh; symbolic resistance; visual discourse

Full Text:

PDF


References

Barker, C., & Emma, A. J. (2021). Kajian Budaya: Teori dan Praktik (fifth edition). (Erika Setiyawati, Translator). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bourdieu, P. (1979) La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de minuit.

Burhan, A. (2008). Perkembangan Seni Lukis Mooi Indië sampai Persagi di Batavia, 1900-1942. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Perkembangan_Seni_Lukis_Mooi_Indi%C3%AB_samp.html?id=L8GPDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 16 April 2025 at 22:00 WIB).

Claudia, K., & Rudy, T. (2019). Kajian Pusat Spiritual dalam Konteks Jawa. Jurnal Stupa: Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur, 1(2), 1037-1048. https://www.academia.edu/79693331/Kajian_Pusat_Spiritual_Dalam_Konteks_Jawa (accessed on 14 Oktober 2025 at 23:20 WIB).

Hoed, B. (2014). Semiotik dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya (third printing). Depok: Komunitas Bambu.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (2016). Li.ne.ar [online]. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/linear (accessed on 31 Mei 2025 at 19:45 WIB).

Kraus, W. (2018). Raden Saleh: Kehidupan dan Karyanya. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Raden_Saleh_dan_Karyanya.html?id=osx7DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 1 Juni 2025 at 09:44 WIB).

Morante, L. (2017). Editing and Montage in International Film and Video: Theory and Technique. Routledge.

National Gallery Singapore. (2021). Merapi, Eruption by Day [online]. https://web.nationalgallery.sg/#/detail?id=446053110&type=Artwork (accessed on 15 Mei 2025 at 08:32 WIB).

Onghokham. (1994). Hindia yang Dibekukan: “Mooi Indie” dalam Seni Rupa dan Ilmu Sosial. Kalam: Jurnal Kebudayaan, third edition, 37-43.

Poortenaar, J., & Geertruida P. (ca. 1924). Een Kunstreis in de Tropen. Zutphen: W. J. Thieme & Cie.

Protschky, S. (2011). Images of the tropics: Environment and visual culture in colonial Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Soekiman, D. (2011). Kebudayaan Indis: Dari Zaman Kompeni sampai Revolusi. Komunitas Bambu.

Supangkat, J., & Goenawan M. (1976). Seni Lukis Indonesia Baru: sebuah pengantar. Dewan Kesenian Jakarta.

Wirajati, Y. (2023). Kemolekan yang Ambivalen: Membaca Lukisan Mooi Indie dengan Perspektif Pascakolonialisme. Dekonstruksi, 9(03), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v9i03.169 (accessed on 8 April 2024 at 09:20 WIB).

Yuliman, S. (1969, November). Mentjari Indonesia dalam Seni Lukis Indonesia. Budaja Djaja: madjalah kebudajaan umum, Number 18 of 2, 676-677.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.104551

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 165 | views : 61

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Dionisius Krisnambudi, Sri Kusomo Habsari, Eva Farhah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal is published by Performing Arts and Visual Arts Studies, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
statistics View My Stats