SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM IN MUSIC: ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEANING AND CULTURAL IDENTITY NEGOTIATION

Bondet Wrahatnala; Abraham Anton Febrindo Luwiga; Ifa Hanifa Rahman; Riana Kapri; Kristoforus Frederic Setyanto

doi:10.22146/jksks.112544

SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM IN MUSIC: ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEANING AND CULTURAL IDENTITY NEGOTIATION

https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.112544

Bondet Wrahatnala^(1*), Abraham Anton Febrindo Luwiga⁽²⁾, Ifa Hanifa Rahman⁽³⁾, Riana Kapri⁽⁴⁾, Kristoforus Frederic Setyanto⁽⁵⁾

(1) Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(2) Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(3) Insitut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(4) Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(5) Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study examines musical practice as an arena of symbolic interaction in society, using the theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism. The framework stems from the assumption that social meaning is not inherently attached to objects or actions, but is formed through symbolic exchange between individuals and through processes of reflection and self-interpretation in social interaction. This research explores how music actors (players, listeners, communities) participate in the construction of musical meaning, how musical symbols are interpreted and negotiated, and how music functions as a medium for identity formation and social transformation. Through a descriptive-interpretive approach based on literature review of theories and previous research findings, it was found that symbolic interaction in musical practice encompasses processes of symbol repetition, public negotiation, role internalization, and intergenerational reinterpretation. Music becomes more than sound: it is a vehicle for symbolic communication that actively shapes and is shaped by society. These findings confirm that music analysis in ethnomusicology must consider aspects of symbolic micro-interaction in order to understand how cultural meaning, identity, and social structure are realized and transformed through music.

Keywords

Ethnomusicology, Music, Musical Identity, Symbol, Symbolic Interactionism, Social Meaning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Becker, H. S. (1982). howard-s-becker-art-worlds. University Of California Press. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Blumer, Herbert. (1969). Symbolic interactionism : perspective and method. University of California Press. Born, G. (2011). Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture, 16(4), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183511424196 Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6), 931–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396 Christina Permana, E., Roganda Parlindungan, D., Bisnis dan Komunikasi, F., & Teknologi dan Bisnis Kalbis Jalan Pulomas Selatan Kav, I. (2023). Interaksi Simbolik dalam Pertunjukan Kesenian Tari Sintren Cirebon. In Jurnal Bisnis dan Komunikasi (Vol. 10, Issue 2). DeNora, T. (2004). Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press. Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1998). Music and social movements. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. Feld, S., & Basso, K. H. (1996). Senses Of Place. School Of American Research Advanced. Frith, Simon. (1996). Performing rites : on the value of popular music. Harvard University Press. Goffman, E. (1959). THE PRESENTATION OF SELF IN EVERYDAY LIFE. DOUBLEDAY ANCHOR BOOKS DOUBLEDAY & COMPANY, INC. Hermiasih, L. (2015). DIASPORA INDONESIA DAN GAMELAN JAWA DI INGGRIS: DAMPAK RELOKASI TRADISI TERHADAP PEMBENTUKAN IDENTITAS DAN KOMUNITAS. In Jurnal Kajian Seni (Vol. 01, Issue 02). Imawan, K. (2017). PESAN SIMBOLIK DALAM SENI TARI BEDAYA KAJONGAN SEBAGAI REALITAS BUDAYA MASYARKAT CIREBON. Irawati, E. (2014). MAKNA SIMBOLIK PERTUNJUKAN KELENTANGAN DALAM UPACARA BELIAN SENTIU SUKU DAYAK BENUAQ DESA TANJUNG ISUY, KUTAI BARAT, KALIMANTAN TIMUR. Jurnal Kajian Seni, 01(01), 60–73. Kotarba, J. A. (2014). Symbolic interaction and applied social research: A focus on translational science. Symbolic Interaction, 37(3), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.111 Mead, G. H. (1934). MIND, SELF, and SOCIETY. THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS. Merriam, A. P. (1964). THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF MUSIC. Northwestern University Press. Mulyana, D. (2001). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Paradigma baru ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Remaja Rosdakarya. Nettl, B. (2015). The Study of Ethnomusicology Thirty-Three Discussions. University of Illinois Press. Oki, D., Dadang, S., Bucky, W., & Kunto, S. (2020). Adaptasi Estetika Permainan Musik Barat. Jurnal Kajian Seni, 07(01), 107–122. Rice, T. (2003). Time, Place, and Metaphor in Musical Experience and Ethnography. Rice, T. (2014). Ethnomusicology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. Turino, Thomas. (2008). Music as social life : the politics of participation. The University of Chicago Press. Vivian, Y. I. (2018). ALBUM KOMPILASI SEBAGAI PEMBENTUK HABITUS MUSIKAL BAGI KOMUNITAS JAZZ JOGJA. Jurnal Kajian Seni, 04(02), 179–196. Wulandari, I. (2025). THE SHIFTING FUNCTION OF ABDUL MULUK’S TRADITIONAL THEATER: FOLK PERFORMANCE TO AN EXCLUSIVE PERFORMANCE. Jurnal Kajian Seni, 11(02), 215–233. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jksks.112544