Beyond State Recognition of Customary Forests: Initiating Agrarian Reform in Indigenous Peoples
Eko Cahyono(1*), Arif Satria(2), Endriatmo Soetarto(3), Soeryo Adiwibowo(4), Didik Suhardjito(5)
(1) Department of Communication Science and Community Development, IPB University, Indonesia. Sajogyo Institute Bogor, Indonesia.
(2) Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Indonesia.
(3) Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Indonesia.
(4) Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Indonesia.
(5) Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Indonesia.
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article examines the socio-political dynamics of agrarian issues surrounding the recognition of customary forests in Kasepuhan Karang, Lebak Regency, Banten. The recognition of customary forests is interpreted by indigenous peoples as a political victory. The political policy of recognition provides opportunities for indigenous peoples to reclaim their customary lands that have been subjected to agrarian colonialism, although this is limited to the recognition of customary forest areas. The data presented is based on the author's periodic research, which was intensive during 2018 and 2019, and continued through various field studies in 2020, 2023, 2024, and early 2025. Field data was collected using qualitative methods, through direct observation, live-in, in-depth interviews with key informants, and focus group discussions. The findings of this research show that the state's recognition of customary forests is half-hearted, partial, and fragmentary, so that socio-agrarian conditions remain unchanged and the previous structure of agrarian inequality remains intact. The state unilaterally recognized only some of the proposed customary forests, while ignoring the social dynamics and changes in the Kasepuhan Karang community, which experienced social differentiation due to the concentration of land ownership. The ideas and recommendations proposed are to encourage agrarian reform in indigenous peoples. This is to ensure agrarian justice, which has been ignored by the existing political recognition model. Among the requirements for agrarian reform in indigenous peoples is interconnectivity between ecological aspects, tenure systems, and local socio-cultural aspects, so that its implementation is flexible and contextual, and certainly cannot be standardized.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ariya. 2024. “Status Pengakuan Wilayah Adat Di Indonesia Pada Hari Kebangkitan Masyarakat Adat Nusantara 2024.” Berita BRWA, March 19.
Arizona, Yance, Muki Trenggono Wicaksono, and Jacqueline Vel. 2019. “The Role of Indigeneity NGOs in the Legal Recognition of Adat Communities and Customary Forests in Indonesia.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. doi:10.1080/14442213.2019.1670241.
Borras Jr., Saturnino M., and J. Franco. 2010. “Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10:1–32.
Cahyono, Eko, ed. 2016. Konflik Masyarakat Adat Atas Wilayahnya Di Kawasan Hutan. Laporan Inkuiri Nasional Komnas HAM. Komnas HAM.
Davidson, Jamie S., Sandra Moniaga, and David Henley. 2010. Adat Dalam Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Fahmi, Chairul. 2020. “The Dutch Colonial Economic Policy on Native Land Property in Indonesia.” PETITA: Journal of Legal and Sharia Studies (PJKIHdS) 5(2).
Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
Jaetuloh, Ahmad. 2019. “Risalah Tanah: Upaya Menata Ulang Sumber-Sumber Agraria Di Kasepuhan Karang, Desa Jagaraksa.” in Menakar Kebijakan Reforma Agraria dan Perhutanan Sosial. Bogor: Sajogyo Institute.
Klaveren, N. A. 2013. The Dutch Colonial System in the East Indies. London: Springer.
Kurniawan, N. I., & Rye, S. A. (2025). The relational state and local struggles in the mapping of land in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 52(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2366329
Li, Tania. 2010. “Indigeneity, Capitalism, and the Management of Dispossession.” Current Anthropology 51(3):385–414.
Lund, C., and N. F. Rachman. 2018. “Indirect Recognition: Frontiers and Territorialization around Mount Halimun-Salak National Park, Indonesia.” World Development 101:417–28.
Musaddad, Adhitiya M. A., and Melani Abdulkadir-sunito. 2021. “Perubahan Penguasaan Lahan Sesudah Penetapan Hutan Adat (Kasus : Kasepuhan Karang, Banten).” Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat 05(02):272–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.29244/jskpm.v5i2.708.
Peluso, Nancy, and P. Vandergeest. 2021. “Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.” The Journal of Asian Studies 60(3).
Rachman, N. F. 2011. The Resurgence of Land Reform Policy and Agrarian Movements in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rachman, N. F., and Hasriadi Masalam. 2017. “The Trajectory of Indigeneity Politics Against Land Dispossession in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1(1):98—113.
Ramdhaniaty, Nia. 2017. Perempuan Adat Non Elit, Eksklusi Berlapis, Dan Perjuangan Hak Kewarganegaraan Atas Hutan Adat (Studi Kasus Di Masyarakat Adat Kasepuhan Karang, Kabupaten Lebak, Banten). Jakarta: Program Studi Kajian Gender Sekolah Kajian Stratejik Dan Global, Universitas Indonesia.
Riyanto, Geger. 2025. “Indigeneity as a Sphere of Differences: State Enclosure and Counter-Enclosure of Rural Spaces in Indonesia.” Anthropological Theory 1–25. doi:10.1177/14634996251313825.
RMI. 2023. Pembelajaran Pra Dan Pascapenetapan Hutan Adat: Studi Kasus Dari Proses Penetapan Hutan Adat Tujuh Masyarakat Adat Di Indonesia 2016-2019. limited publication.
Sajogyo. 2006. Ekososiologi: Deideologisasi Teori, Restrukturisasi Aksi: Petani Dan Pedesaan Sebagai Kasus Uji. Yogyakarta; Bogor; Jakarta: Cindelaras; Sajogyo Institute; Bina Desa.
Sajogyo, and Pudjiwati. 1982. Sosiologi Pedesaan Jilid 1. 1982nd ed. Yogyakarta; Jakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sangkoyo, Hendro. 2009. Indonesian Peasant Politics. Unpublished.
Sangkoyo, Hendro. 2015. “Catatan Kecil Untuk Rintisan Jalan Setapak Di Kepulauan Maluku Sebelah Utara.” in Perampasan Ruang Hidup: Cerita Orang Halmahera. Yogyakarta: Tanah Air Beta.
Savitri, Laksmi A. 2014. “Rentang Batas Dari Rekognisi Hutan Adat Dalam Kepengaturan Neoliberal.” Jurnal Wacana Transformasi Sosial 33:61–98.
Shohibuddin, Mohammad. 2018. Perspektif Agraria Kritis. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Shohibuddin, Mohammad, Eko Cahyono, Habiburrachman, Fajar Ahsani, and Gayatri Kusumastuti. 2023. “Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial Yang ‘Tutup Mata’? Kasus Komunitas Adat Di Pinggir Hutan Egon Ilinmedo, Kabupaten Sikka, Nusa Tenggara Timur.” Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sosiologi (PKNS) 1(2):400–407.
Simanjuntak, Wina T. S., and Mia Siscawati. 2023. “The Position of Indigenous Women in Indigenous Economy: Indigenous Women’s Livelihoods in Indonesia.” Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Arts and Humanities Stream (AHS-APRISH 2019) 487–506.
Siscawati, Mia, and N. F. Rachman. 2014. Gender Dan Politik Konsesi Agraria: Dimensi Gender Dalam Mekanisme-Mekanisme Penguasaan Tanah, Perubahan Tata-Guna Tanah, Dan Krisis Sosial-Ekologis Dalam Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit, Pertambangan, Hutan Tanaman Industri, Dan Restorasi Ekosistem. Kertas Kerja Sajogyo Institute. Bogor: Sajogyo Institute.
Soetarto, Endriatmo. 2023. “Eksistesi Masyarakat Adat Dalam Kancah Nasionalisme Indonesia,” March 19, ICC – IPB University.
Tamma, and T. Duile. 2020. “Indigeneity and the State in Indonesia: The Local Turn in the Dialectic of Recognition.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 39(2):270–89.
Tsing, Anna. 1998. Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Ratu Intan: Proses Marjinalisasi Pada Masyarakat Terasing. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Wibowo, A. 2019. “Asal Usul Kebijakan Pencadangan Hutan Adat Di Indonesia.” Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 5(1):26–41. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.31292/jb.v5i1.317.
Wiradi, Gunawan. 2009. Reforma Agraria, Perjalanan Yang Belum Berakhir. Bogor; Bandung; Jakarta: Sajogyo Institute; AKATIGA; KPA.
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Indexed by:
ISSN 2252-570X (Print), ISSN 2502-2059 (online).











