Measuring Populist Communication Discourse of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates’ Campaigns on Social Media

Nicolas Kriswinara Astanujati

doi:10.22146/jsp.101578

Measuring Populist Communication Discourse of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates’ Campaigns on Social Media

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.101578

Nicolas Kriswinara Astanujati^(1*)

(1) Department of Politics and Government, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

In the recent Indonesian presidential election, social media became a battleground for political campaigns, and candidates were often labelled as populists. This article challenges those claims by examining discursive patterns in the social media content of the 2024 presidential candidates on X (formerly Twitter ). The study investigates three candidates: Anies Baswedan, Prabowo Subianto, and Ganjar Pranowo through a dataset of posts (N = 792). Using quantitative content analysis based on Cassell’s (2020a) discursive framework, the study categorises content into four master frames: populism, pluralism, technocracy, and neutrality, along with 13 related rhetorical elements. This approach allows for mapping of both populist and non-populist communication discourses, addressing the limitations of qualitative methods alone. The findings differ from the expected populist narrative. While each candidate possesses a unique frame of discourse, neutral element patterns emerged as the most frequently employed among all candidates. They turned formal political discourse into “everyday politics” by drawing on daily activities and positive emotions in their X content. This strategy reflects two sides of a coin. On the one hand, it allows candidates to build an approachable and relatable persona, while on the other, it reduces constructive and critical debate on policy and politics. This study argues that the rise of the “everyday politician” signals a transformation in Indonesian campaign strategies, one that actively depoliticises campaign discourse and poses a direct challenge to how populism is defined and measured within the evolving landscape of the digital public sphere.

Keywords

populism; social media; communication discourse; everyday politicians; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, N. (2022). Populist Political Ideation and Comm unication of Gubernatorial Candidates in Indonesia’s 2018 Gubernatorial Elections: Anti- Establishment Views, Secular Nationalism and Islamism as Ideational-Populist Elements. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics , 7 (1), 73–94. htt ps:/ / doi. org/10.1177/2057891120931932

Aspinall, E. (2015). Oligarchic Populism: Prabowo Subianto’s Challenge to Indonesian Democracy. Indonesia, 99 (April 2015), pp. 1–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ind.2015.0002

Azmi, A., Sylvia, I., & Mardhiah, D. (2018). Indonesian Politicians’ Social Media Role in Encouraging Civic Engagement. Annual Civic Education Conference, p. 251. https://doi.org/10.2991/acec-18.2018.70

Bachtiar, H. (2023a). Ganjar Pranowo’s Quest: Resisting Islamist Civilizational Populism in Indonesia. Populism & Politics, European C(December 19), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.55271/pp0028

Bachtiar, H. (2023b). Indonesian Islamist Populism and Anies Baswedan. Populism & Politics, European C(October 10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55271/PP0025

Baswedan, A., & Iskandar, M. (2023). Indonesia adil makmur untuk semua: Visi, misi, dan program kerja Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar [A Prosperous Indonesia for All: Vision, mission, and work programs of Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar ]. Retrieved 24 October, 2025, from https:// mmc.tirto.id/documents/2023/10/20/1241- amin-visi-misi-program.pdf

Bissonette, D. (2020). “Modern Day Presidential:” Donald Trump and American Politics in the Age of Twitter. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 9(1), 180–206. https://thejsms.org/index.php/JSMS/article/view/472

Bobba, G. (2018). Social Media Populism: Features and “Likeability” of Lega Nord Communication on Facebook. European Political Science, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8

Bobba, G., & Roncarolo, F. (2018). The Likeability of Populism on Social Media in the 2018 Italian General Election. Italian Political Science, 13(1), 51–62. Retrieved from https://italianpoliticalscience.com/index.php/ips/article/view/32

Bronstein, J., Aharony, N., & Bar-ilan, J. (2018). Politicians’ use of Facebook during elections engagement and vividness. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0067

Casero-Ripolles, A., Sintes-Olivella, M., & Franch, P. (2017). The Populist Political Communication Style in Action: Podemos’s Issues and Functions on Twitter During the 2016 Spanish General Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624

Cassell, K. J. (2020a). Methodological Memo on Measuring Populist Rhetoric on Twitter. Vanderbilt University.

Cassell, K. J. (2020b). When “Following” the Leader Inspires Action: Individuals’ Receptivity to Discursive Frame Elements on Social Media. Political Communication, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1829761

Cassell, K. J. (2021). The Populist Communication Strategy in Comparative Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211055695

de la Torre, C., & Srisa-Nga, T. (2021). Global Populism. London: Routledge.

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (First Edit). New York: Oxford University Press

Dryzek, J. S. (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternativ es to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory, 33(2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372

Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2016). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information Communication and Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697

Fernandes, A., Suryahudaya, E. G., & Okthariza, N. (2023). Pemilih muda dalam pemilihan umum 2024: Dinamis, adaptif dan responsif. Departemen Politik dan Perubahan Sosial, CSIS Indonesia.

Geise, S., Maubach, K., & Eli, A. B. (2025). Picture me in person: Personalization and emotionalization as political campaign strategies on social media in the German federal election period 2021. New Media & Society, 27(7), 3745–3769. https://doi. org/10.1177/14614448231224031

Gil de Zúñiga, H., Koc Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in The Era of Twitter: How Social Media Contextualized New Insights Into an Old Phenomenon. New Media and Society, 22(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893978

Grüning, D. J., & Schubert, T. W. (2022). Emotional Campaigning in Politics: Being Moved and Anger in Political Ads Motivate to Support Candidate and Party. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781851

Hamid, A. (2014). Jokowi’s Populism in the 2012 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341403300105

Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez Populist?: Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721

Hawkins, K. A. (2017). The Id eational Approach to Populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446

Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2019). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis (First Edit). London: Routledge.

Hawkins, K. A., & Silva, B. C. (2019). Textual Analysis: Big Data Analysis. In K. A.

Hawkins, R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis, p. 3 (First Edit). Routledge.

Husada, T. (2023). Suara pemuda dalam Pemilu 2024, sekadar komoditas politik atau benar-benar didengar aspirasinya?. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c29814geg2eo

Imawan, A. P. (2024). Everyday Politicians towards Indonesian Election 2024 (Issue 43, pp. 1–5). Habibie Center.

Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x

Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572619

Kenny, P. D. (2018). Populism in Southeast Asia (First Edit). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379695.00050

Kinnvall, C., & Svensson, T. (2022). Exploring the populist ‘mind’: Anxiety, fantasy, and everyday populism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(3), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221075925

Kissas, A. (2022). Populist everyday politics in the (mediatized) age of social media: The case of Instagram celebrity advocacy. New Media & Society, 26(5), 2766-2785. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221092006

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to It’s Methodology. In Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, p. 241 (Second Edit). SAGE Publications.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (First Edit). London: Verso.

Lam, S. Y. B., Cheung, M. F. M., & Lo, W. H. (2021). What matters most in the responses to political campaign posts on social media: The candidate, message frame, or message format? Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106800. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106800

Lee, S. J., Wu, C., & Bandyopadhyay, K. K. (2021). Populism in Asian Democracies: Features, Structures, and Impacts (S. J. Lee, C. Wu, & K. K. Bandyopadhyay (eds.); First Edit). Brill.

MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I × J chi-square tables. Educ ational and Psyc hol ogic al Measurement, 60(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970871

Mas’udi, W. (2017). Creating Legitimacy in Decentralized Indonesia: Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s Path to Legitimacy in Solo, 2005-2012. University of Melbourne.

Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially Mediated Populism: The Communicative Strategies of Political Leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4(50), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0104-x

Mediana. (2024, February 25). Tiktok dan Prabowo-Gibran Jadi Juara di Gelanggang Media Sosial. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2024/02/25/data-operator-seluler-mengonfirmasi-tiktok-paling-banyak-digunakan-warganet-selama-periode-pemilu

Mietzner, M. (2014). Indonesia’s 2014 Elections: How Jokowi Won and Democracy Survived. Journal of Democracy, 25(4), 111–125. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/556415/summary

Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian populism: Jokowi’s rise, democracy, and political contestation in Indonesia (Policy Studies No. 72). East-West Center.

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An Ideational Approach. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (First Edit). Oxford University Press.

Norris, P. (2020). Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics, 26(6), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820927686

Nugroho, Y. (2024, 5 June). Oposisi dalam Hidup Bernegara. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/oposisi-dalam-hidup-bernegara

Panizza, F. (2005). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (F. Panizza (ed.); First Edit). Verso. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3063

Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin’s Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651960

Priyansyah, R. N., Sulaiman, R. R., & Firdaus, F. R. (2024). When the Opposition Dominates the Conversation (Twitter Network Analysis about the Controversial Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision). Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jkmi.v13i1.1221

Rakhmani, I., & Saraswati, M. S. (2021). Authoritarian Populism in Indonesia: The Role of the Political Campaign Industry in Engineering Consent and Coercion. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211027885

Rooduijn, M., & Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics, 34(6), 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.616665

Sastramidjaja, Y. (2024, February 1). Indonesian Voters’ Preferences in 2024: Less Determined, More Diverse. Fulcrum: Analysis on Southeast Asia. https://fulcrum.sg/indonesian-voters-preferences-in-2024-less-determined-more-diverse/

Satriawan, B. H., Haridison, A., Sandi, J. R. A., Iskandar, D., Utami, P. J., Irwan, A. I. U., & Hartaman, N. (2025). Politainment in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election and positioning in downstream industry. Frontiers in Political Science, 6(1494578), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1494578

Savirani, A., Prabawati, D., Hiariej, E., Hanif, H., Santoso, P., Sari, R. K., Hapsari, W., Samadhi, W. P., Törnquist, O., & Stokke, K. (2014). Demokrasi di Indonesia: Antara Patronase dan Populisme. Universitas Gadjah Mada & University of Oslo

Swasono, S. E. (2024, August 16). Democracy of the People’s Sovereignty. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-demokrasi-daulat-rakyat

Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens, and The Digital Revolution, pp. xx-xxii (First Edit). Rowman & Littlefield International.

Thompson, R. (2011). Radicalization and the Use of Social Media. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.8

Ufen, A. (2010). Electoral Campaigning in Indonesia: The Professionalization and Commercialization after 1998. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(4), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341002900402

Wahid, A. (2024, February 23). Did Prabowo Subianto’s TikTok makeover impact the Indonesian election results? ANU Reporter. Asia Pacific & Beyond. https://reporter.anu.edu.au/all-stories/did-prabowo-subiantos-tiktok-makeover-impact-the-indonesian-election-results

Wood, M., Corbett, J., & Flinders, M. (2016). Just Like Us: Everyday Celebrity Politicians and the Pursuit of Popularity in an Age of Anti-Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116632182

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.101578