Democratic regression in Indonesia: Police and low-capacity democracy in Jokowi's administration (2014–2020)

Sarah Nuraini Siregar; Riaty Raffiudin; Firman Noor

doi:10.22146/jsp.72129

Democratic regression in Indonesia: Police and low-capacity democracy in Jokowi's administration (2014–2020)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.72129

Sarah Nuraini Siregar^(1*), Riaty Raffiudin⁽²⁾, Firman Noor⁽³⁾

(1) Departement of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia; National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia.
(2) Departement of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
(3) National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia.
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Discussions about democratisation have often revolved around the strengthening or weakening phenomenon/notion of democracy. This research is a continuation of previous studies on democratic regression in Indonesia. Charles Tilly (2007) examined democratic regression from democracy and de-democratization theory through the concept of low-capacity democracy. Tilly's perspective argues a low-capacity democratic process occurred during the Joko Widodo administration in Indonesia from 2014 to 2020 when the state implemented the Police as a political instrument to maintain power. As a result, the character of the Police deviated from democratic principles, leading to a problem for police professionalism. The study employs qualitative methods, in which the primary data is obtained from in-depth interviews with several key informants. The secondary data is gathered from scientific works of literature and news in online media. This study indicates how low-capacity democracy developed through: first, the Indonesian regime's intervention and exercise of control by involving and appointing police officers to civilian positions; second, police repression against civil liberties; and third, the Police's justification for their authority and power. Thus, this study confirms Tilly's argument that a low-capacity democratic process occurs when democratic countries pursue undemocratic methods by manipulating the Police as an instrument to strengthen the power of the regime. The recommendation of this study is to strengthen democracy in terms of law enforcement by the supervision of parliament and supervisory institutions to retain the Police’s role as an independent law enforcement institution.

Keywords

police; democratic regression; professionalism; law enforcement; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. The University of Chicago Press.

Anggraini, T. (2021). Interview with Researcher of Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem).

Aspinall, E. W. E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency, and Popular Opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285.

Azhar, H. (2021). Interview with The Director of Lokataru Foundation.

BBC Indonesia. (2019). Demonstrasi mahasiswa: Polri diminta “hentikan cara arogan dan kekerasan.” https://www.bbc.com/ indonesia/indonesia-49820967

Berenschot, E. A. W. (2019). Democracy For Sale: Elections, Clientelism, And The State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Bland, B. (2019). Politics in Indonesia: Resilient Elections, Defective Democracy. Lowy Institute for International Policy.

Chakrabarti, S. (2008). A Thinning Blue Line? Police Independence and The Rule of Law. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pan052

CNN Indonesia. (2020a). Amnesty Ungkap 43 Video Kekerasan Polisi di Demo UU Ciptaker. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201202144029-20-577113/amnesty-ungkap-43-video-kekerasan-polisi-di-demo-uu-ciptaker

CNN Indonesia. (2020b). Duduk Manis Jenderal Polisi di Jabatan Sipil Era Jokowi. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ nasional/20200630144023-12-519071/ duduk-manis-jenderal-polisi-di-jabatan- sipil-era-jokowi

CNN Indonesia. (2020c). KontraS: Polri Terlibat 921 Kekerasan dan HAM dalam Setahun. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ nasional/20200630211022-12-519281/ kontras-polri-terlibat-921-kekerasan-dan- ham-dalam-setahun

Diamond, L. (2021). Democratic Regression in Comparative Perspective: Scope, Methods, and Causes. Democratization, 28, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517

Fealy, G. (2020). Jokowi in the Covid-19 Era: Repressive Pluralism, Dynasticism and the Overbearing State. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(3), 301–323.

Freedom House. (n.d.). Freedom in The World. Retrieved May 21, 2022, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world

Gerschewski, J. (2021). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression. Democratization, 28(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935

Gismar, M. R. S. M. M. S. H. A. M. (2020). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia 2019. Dua Dekade Reformasi: Potret Capaian dan Tantangan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Kement erian Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, dan Keamanan.

Hadiz, R. R. V. R. (2005). Neo-Liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesian Paradox. Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), 220–241.

Haynes, A. C. J. (2021). Democratic regression in Asia: introduction. Democratization, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1851203

Honna, J. (2013). Security Challenges and Military Reform in Post-authoritarian Indonesia: The Impact of Separatism, Terrorism, and Communal Violence. In J. R. M.-G. M. H. Born (Ed.), The Politics of Military Reform: Experiences from Indonesia and Nigeria (pp. 185–199). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29624-6

Idhom, A. M. (2017). Polri Ancam Bubarkan Semua Demo Pendukung HTI. https://tirto.id/polri-ancam-bubarkan-semua-demo-pendukung-hti-cs3e

IDSPS. (2008). Langkah-langkah Reformasi Internal Polri. In Newsletter: Media dan Reformasi Sektor Keamanan.

Irfany, R. (2020). 30 Perwira Polisi Disebut Jadi Komisaris BUMN hingga Pejabat. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1359771/30-perwira-polisi-disebut-jadi-komisaris-bumn-hingga-pejabat/full&view=ok

Maharani, T. (2021). Kontras: Pandemi Covid-19 Jadi Dalih Polisi Lakukan Tindak Kekerasan. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/06/30/15533541/kontras- pandemi-covid-19-jadi-dalih-polisi- lakukan-tindak-kekerasan

Makaarim, M. (2015). Quo Vadis Reformasi Polri 2010-2015. In B. S. M. A. Dato (Ed.), Almanak Reformasi Sektor Keamanan Indonesia 2015 (pp. 86–107). LESPERSSI.

Maryoto, A. B. (2021). Interview with Head of Inspectorate of Police Headquarters.

Meliala, A. (2021). Interview with Criminology Academics of Universitas Indonesia; Police Observer.

Midyawan, Y. (2021). Interview with Deputy Director of Community Development-Metro Jaya Regional Police.

Mietzner, E. A. M. (2019). Indonesia’s Democratic Paradox: Competitive Elections Amidst Rising Illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317.

Mietzner, M. (2006). Policy Studies 23: The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism, and Institutional Resistance. East-West Center.

Muradi. (2014). Politics and Governance in Indonesia: The Police in the Era of Reformasi(1st editio). Routledge.

Nugraheni, D. E. (2020). ICJR: Kepolisian Harus Profesional Menuntaskan Kasus Peretesan. https://nasional.kompas.com/ read/2020/08/24/09344521/icjr-kepolisian-harus-profesional-menuntaskan-kasus-peretesan?page=all

Osse, A. (2007). Memahami Pemolisian. Rinam Antartika CV.

Power, T. P. (2018). Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1549918

Prasetyo, S. A. (2012). Polri Masih Dikecam: Potret 10 Tahun Reformasi. Jurnal Studi Kepolisian, 77, 14–25.

Prayogo, D. (2019). Hadiah Kayu Untuk Para Demonstran. Dugaan Pelanggaran Hak Asasi dan Aksi Kekerasan Aparat Terhadap Peserta Demonstrasi.

Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. In Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. https:// doi.org/10.4324/9780203401453

Samego, I. (2021). Interview with LIPI’s researcher and Polri Chief Expert Staff.

Sani, A. F. I. (2020). Buat Akun Twitter Baru Usai Diretas, Pandu Riono: Mati Satu Tumbuh Seribu. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1378882/buat-akun-twitter-baru-usai-diretas-pandu-riono-mati-satu-tumbuh-seribu

Seri, Michelle D. Bonner; Michael Kempa; Mary Rose Kubal; Guillermina. (2018). Police Abuse in Contemporary Democracies. In Michelle D. Bonner; Michael Kempa; Mary Rose Kubal; Guilermina Seri (Ed.), Police Abuse in Contemporary Democracies (pp. 1–27). Springer.

Simanjuntak, T. R. (2021). Kronologi Tanggal Penting Kasus Kerumunan Petamburan dan Megamendung dari Rizieq Shihab . https://megapolitan.kompas.com/ read/2021/05/28/13264691/kronologi- tanggal-penting-kasus-kerumunan-petam buran-dan-m egam e nd un g- dari?page=all

Simarmata, M. (2020). Presiden Pakai Pasal 30 UU Polri Untuk Perpanjang Masa Dinas Irjen Arman Depari. https://politik.rmol.id/read/2020/10/14/456468/presiden-pakai-pasal-30-uu-polri-untuk-perpanjang-masa-dinas-irjen-arman-depari

Sinaga, K. (2021). Interview with Minister of Home Affairs (Tito Karnavian) Expert Staff.

Siregar, S. N. (2008). Evaluasi Sepuluh Tahun Reformasi Polri. Penelitian Politik, 5(1), 47–58.

Siregar, S. N. (2010a). Pemikiran Reformasi Polri: Sebuah Pendahuluan. In S. N. Siregar (Ed.), Polri di Era Demokrasi: Dinamika Pemikiran Internal (pp. 1–24). LIPI Press.

Siregar, S. N. (Ed.). (2010b). Polri di Era Demokrasi: Dinamika Pemikiran Internal. LIPI Press.

Siregar, S. N. (Ed.). (2015a). Reformasi Struktural Polri 1999-2010. Penerbit Andi.

Siregar, S. N. (Ed.). (2015b). Tinjauan Kritis Reformasi Kultural Polri (1999-2012). PT Gading Inti Prima.

Siregar, S. N. (Ed.). (2017a). Pencapaian Reformasi Instrumental Polri Tahun 1999-2011. Penerbit Andi.

Siregar, S. N. (2017b). Polisi Sipil Dalam Reformasi Polri: Upaya dan Dilema Antara Penegakan HAM dan Fungsi Kepolisian. Penelitian Politik, 14(2), 149–164.

Smith, T. J. T. N. D. J. (1996). Policing and The Idea of Democracy. The British Journal of Criminology, 36(2), 182–198.

Stanley (Ed.). (n.d.). Keamanan, Demokrasi, dan Pemilu 2004. Propatria.

Sulistyanto, A. (2021). Interview with Head of Security Maintenance Agency of Police Headquarters.

Sulistyo, M. T. K. H. (2017). Democratic Policing. Pensil.

Sutrisno. (2012). Polis i Dalam Ideologi Demokrasi. Jurnal Studi Kepolisian, 76, 9–21.

Tempo.co. (2016). Mapol Gugat Presiden Tunjuk Tito Karnavian Sebagai Kapolri. https:// nasional.tempo.co/read/780620/mapol-gugat-presiden-tunjuk-tito-karnavian-sebagai-kapolri/full&view=ok

Tempo. (2015). Kontras: Polri Paling Banyak Melanggar HAM Selama 2015. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/726561/kontras-polri-paling-banyak-melanggar-ham-selama-2015/full&view=ok

The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2021). Democracy Index 2020: In Sickness in Health?

Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Wagemann, L . T. C. (2018). Varieties of contemporary democratic breakdown and regression: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12244

Warburton, E. A. E. (2017). Indonesia: The Dangers of Democratic Regress ion. Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 1–4.

Warburton, T. P. E. (2020). The Decline of Indonesian Democracy. In T. P. E. Warburton (Ed.), Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression (pp. 1–20). ISEAS Publishing.

Webber, D. (2006). A Consolidated Patrimonial Democracy? Democratization in Post- Suharto Indonesia. Democratization, 13(3), 396–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340600579284

Wiatrowski, N. W. P. M. D. (Ed.). (2006). Democratic Policing in Transitional and Developing Countries. Ashgate.

Widiastuti, D. (2020). Jokowi Anak Emaskan Polisi, Apa Kabar Tni?https://www.matamatapolitik.com/jokowi-anak-emaskan-polisi-apa-kabar-tni-analisis/

Winters, J. A. (2014). Oligarki dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Prisma, 33(1), 11–34.

Zakaria, F. (2003). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. W.W. Norton & Company.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.72129