Violation of Moral Values in Bernard Shaw’s "The Doctor’s Dilemma"

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v1i3.42081

Amaryliani Sukma Gustariana(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Doctor’s Dilemma is known as a tragic play which has become a success and has been reproduced several times. This play has moral values concealed within it. This study aims to find out the moral actions, the reason for Bernard Shaw’s skeptical perception towards physicians, and to learn the circumstances of medical treatment in the early 20th century by analyzing the preface, dialogues, and stage directions in the play. This study basically adopts a combination of mimetic and expressive approaches which regard The Doctor’s Dilemma as the expression of Shaw’s idea and portraits of medical and social life in early 20th century. The analysis is focused on the violation of medical ethics and social norms because they are the dominant in the play. The results of the analysis are the failure of the physician characters in the play to keep their oath as medical attendants because they violate five of eight general duties based on the medical ethic. Then, it is also found out that several characters do not obey the social norm, such as being dishonest, and doing some actions to pursue their personal benefits.


Keywords


medical ethics; social norms; moral values

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abrams, M.H. A Glossary of Literary Terms Seventh Edition. United States of America: Earl Mcpeek, 1999.

Ensor, R.C.K. England 1870-1914. Ed. G.N Clark. Great Britain: University Press, Oxford, 1952.

Enwistle, W.J., & Gillett, E.The Literature of England. Great Britain: Lowe and Brydone Printers Ltd, 1952.

Chesterton, G.K. George Bernard Shaw. New York: The Devin-Adair Company, 1950.

Edel, A. Ethical Judgement: The Use of Science in Ethics. United States of America: The Free Press. 1955.

Shaw, Bernard. The Doctor’s Dilemma.Great Britain: R. & R. Clark, Ltd, Edinburgh,1958.

Shaw, Bernard. The Doctor’s Dilemma: Preface on Doctors. Great Britain: R. & R. Clarl, Ltd, Edinburgh, 1911.

Taher, Tarmidzi. Medical Ethic Manual Praktis Etika Kedokteran untuk Mahasiswa, Dokter, dan Tenaga Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

“World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics” Adopted by the 3rd General Assembly of the World Medical Association, London, England, October 1949. Retrieved from http://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/ICME.pdf on Tuesday, November 19, 2013 (15.33).

Websites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_structure_of_the_United_Kingdom#cite_ref-49downloaded on Sunday, December 22, 2013 (22.20).

http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/. Downloaded on Thursday, January 2, 2014 (20.21). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_oath. Downloaded on Thursday, March 27, 2014 (09.57).

http://www.simplypsychology.org/socialroles.html. Downloaded on Sunday, November 24, 2013 (12.55).

http://www.sociologyguide.com/basicconcepts/Social-Norms.php. Downloaded on Thursday, March 27, 2014 (09.57).

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socialnorms/. Downloaded on Saturday, December 28, 2013 (14.00).

www.shawfest.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/03/Shaw_Festival_Study_Guide_The_Doctors_Dilemma.pdf. Downloaded on October 24, 2013.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v1i3.42081

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 690 | views : 600

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Amaryliani Sukma Gustariana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Lexicon Office

English Department
Faculty of Cultural Sciences,
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
Telephone: +62 274 513096
Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id

ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online)
ISSN: 2302-2558 (Print)

Web Analytics View Stats

Creative Commons License
LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.