Modal Auxiliary Verbs in The Jakarta Post Op-Ed Articles by Indonesian and Non-Indonesian Writers

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v12i1.98573

Aulia Nur Rahmawati(1*), Tofan Dwi Hardjanto(2)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study was aimed at finding the meaning, similarities, and differences of the use of modal auxiliary verbs in editorial text from the Indonesian newspaper, The Jakarta Post, regarding the writers’ various linguistic backgrounds.  The data were collected from 20 editorial articles from outside contributors of the newspaper using corpus linguistics software #Lancsbox v. 6.0 showing 286 instances of eight modal auxiliary verbs. The most employed modal auxiliary verbs by both Indonesian and non-Indonesian writers are can, will, should, may, would, could, must, and might respectively. To find the meaning of the modal auxiliary verbs, Biber et al.’s (1999) classification of deontic and epistemic meanings was used. The result of this study shows that the writers used more modal auxiliary verbs with epistemic meaning rather than deontic meaning, indicating their commitment to the truth of their argument. The writers’ different linguistic background also suggests significant association in expressing their opinions and arguments in terms of their modal auxiliary verbs use.


Keywords


modal auxiliary verbs; deontic; epistemic; corpus linguistics; semantics



References

Ahmad, M., Mahmood, M. A., & Farukh, A. (2020). Use of modals as stance markers: A corpus-based study on Pakistani English Newspaper editorials. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 30(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X20945424

Ali, A., Rashid, A., & Abbas, S. (2020). Modality in Pakistani and British Media Discourse: A corpus-assisted study of editorials in Dawn and the Guardian. Global Mass Communication Review, V(IV), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmcr.2020(V-IV).02

Aning, E. (2020). The use of modal verbs in the 2016 Manifesto of the National Democratic Congress Party in Ghana: A semantic investigation. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 25(7), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2507133946

Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Ling, 27(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (2006). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.

Bloomer, A., Trott, K., & Wray, A. (2006). Projects in linguistics: A practical guide to researching language (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bolívar, A. (2002). The structure of newspaper editorials. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 276–294). Taylor and Francis.

Bonilla, J. F. G. (2017). The use of the epistemic and deontic modality in the modal verb “can” between English native and Spanish non-native students in the written discourse. JACLR: Journal of Artistic Creation and Literary Research, 5(2), 13–24.

Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v3i1.799

Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Croom Helm.

Collins, P. C. (2009). Modals and quasi-modals in English. Rodopi.

Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge.

Goldman, K. D., & Schmalz, K. J. (2000). ’Op to it! Writing op-ed columns. Health Promotion Practice, 1(4), 302–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990000100402

Gómez, P. C. (2002). Do We Need Statistics When We Have Linguistics? DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 18, 233–271.

Hardjanto, T. D. (2016). Hedging through the use of modal auxiliaries in English academic discourse. Jurnal Humaniora, 28(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v28i1.11412

Hardjanto, T. D., & Mazia, N. (2019). “We believe in democracy…”: Epistemic modality in Justin Trudeau’s political speeches. Jurnal Humaniora, 31(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.44948

Haq, A. S., & Mahdi, S. (2020). Investigating the use of modal auxiliary verbs in Tempo editorial. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 2(1), 49—56. https://doi.org/10.32585/.v2i1.671

Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Hauptbd. Heinle & Heinle.

Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325—343. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587627

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.

Jeyanthi, E., Zalina, K. M., Afida, A., & Arbaayah, A. T. (2018). The Hunger Games: Linguistic modality as reflector of point of view in a dystopian novel. Pertanika Journals Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(4), 2395–2415.

Kennedy, G. (2002). Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation. John Benjamins.

Klinge, A. (1993). The English modal auxiliaries: From lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 315–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700000359

Kreidler, C. W. (1998). Introducing English semantics. Routledge.

Le, E. (2010). Editorials and the power of media: Interweaving of socio-cultural identities. John Benjamins.

Li, L. X. (2022). Improving modal verb treatment in English textbooks used by Chinese learners: A corpus-based approach. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079918

Lillian, D. (2008). Modality, persuasion and manipulation in Canadian conservative discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.53494

McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Oktavianti, I. N., & Adnan, A. (2020). A corpus study of verbs in opinion articles of The Jakarta Post and the relation with text characteristics. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2158

Orta, I. V. (2010). A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in business management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica, (19), 77–95.

Ozturk, O., & Papafragou, A. (2015). The Acquisition of epistemic modality: From semantic meaning to pragmatic interpretation. Language Learning and Development, 11(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.905169

Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Piqué-Angordans, J., de València, U., & Posteguillo, S. (2002). Epistemic and deontic modality: A linguistic indicator of disciplinary variation in academic English. LSP & Professional Communication, 2(2), 49–65.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.

Rosenfeld, S. S. (2000). The op-ed page: A step to a better democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(3), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X00005003002

Sadia, S., & Ghani, M. (2018). Modality in editorials of Pakistani English newspapers: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p144

Stefanowitsch, A. (2020). Corpus linguistics: A guide to the methodology. Language Science Press.

Torabiardakani, N., Khojasteh, L., & Shokrpour, N. (2015). Modal auxiliaries and their semantic functions used by advanced EFL learners. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 51—60.

Vukovic, M. (2014). Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0003

Widyanti, E. R., & Yulia, M. F. (2013). A Study on modals used in Text Your Say of The Jakarta Post. LLT Journal, 16(1), 11—21.

Yang, A., Zheng, S., & Ge, G. (2015). Epistemic modality in English-medium medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.005



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v12i1.98573

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aulia Nur Rahmawati, Tofan Dwi Hardjanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.