Titanium oxide coating and acid etching on platelet activation in dental implants
Adella Syvia Maharani(1*), Titik Ismiyati(2), Pramudya Aditama(3), Johari Yap Abdullah(4), Ihwanul Aziz(5)
(1) Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Craniofacial Imaging Laboratory, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
(5) Research Center for Accelerator Technology, Research Organization of Nuclear Energy, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Titanium is the most widely used dental implant material, but it requires surface treatment to improve osseointegration. While coating implants with TiO2, residue can arise, which may lead to contamination. To address this, 10% HF etching is added. This study investigated the effect of TiO2 coating using sputtering and HF etching on platelet activation in titanium dental implants. Laboratory experiments were conducted on titanium implants (Ø = 4 mm; length = 12 mm) treated with TiO2 coating and 10% HF etching. Twenty-four samples were divided into four groups (n = 6): Group I (TiO2), Group II (TiO2 + HF 5 min), Group III (TiO2 + HF 10 min), and Group IV (TiO2 + HF 20 min). Platelet activation was assessed using CD41 and CD62P expression markers. Data analysis employed one-way ANOVA and post hoc LSD test (p = 0.05). Platelet activation ranged from 20.31 ± 1.78% to 35.90 ± 3.81%. One-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect (p < 0.05) of both TiO2 coating and acid etching on activation. LSD post hoc test showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between all groups except for the 10 and 20-minute etching periods. TiO2 coating with 10 minutes of HF etching resulted in the optimal activation level.
Keywords
Full Text:
5. AdellaReferences
1. Veeraiyan, ND. 2017. Textbook of Prosthodontics. 2nd ed. India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers.
2. Oza U, Parikh H, Duseja S. Dental implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review.
International Journal of Dentistry Research. 2020; 5(2): 87-92. doi: 10.31254/dentistry.2020.5212
3. Al-Sabbagh M, Bhavsar I. Key local and surgical factors related to implant failure.
Dental Clinics of North America. 2015; 59(1): 1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.09.001
4. Saini G, Singh Y, Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review. World Journal of
Clinical Cases. 2015; 3(1): 52-57. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52
5. Jemat A, Ghazali MJ, Razali M, Otsuka Y. Surface modifications and their effects on
titanium dental implant. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 1-9. doi: 10.1155/2015/791725
6. Koizumi H, Takeuchi Y, Imai H, Kawai T, Yoneyama T. Application of titanium and
titanium alloys to fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Prosthodontics Research. 2019;
63(3): 266-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.011
7. Dong H, Liu H, Zhou Na, Qiang L. Surface modified techniques and emerging functional
coating of dental implants. Coatings. 2020; 10(12): 1-25. doi: 10.3390/coatings10111012
8. Singh G. Surface treatment of dental implants: a review. Journal of Dental and Medical
Science. 2018; 17(2): 49-53. doi: 10.9790/0853-1702154953
9. Liu Y, Rath B, Tingart M. Role of implants surface modification in osseointegration:
a systematic review. Jounal Biomedical Material Research. 2019; 108(3): 470-484.
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36829
10. Mukaromah UA, Andriyani W, Sutanto H. Layer deposition of titanium dioxide using
DC-Sputtering method with variation of deposition time: study of microstructure and
coating hardenss. Journal of Physics and Its Applications. 2021; 4(1): 14-19.
doi: 10.14710/jpa.v4i1.12331
11. Zahran R, Leal R, Valverde MA. Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching time on titanium
topography, chemistry, wettability, and cell adhesion. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11): 1-12.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165296
12. Afya SR. The influence of different acids etch on dental implants titanium surface. Journal of
Dental and Medical Science. 2016; 15(8): 87-91. doi: 10.9790/0853-1508098791
13. Rajan A, Sivarajan S, Vallabhan CG, Nair AS, Jayakumar S, Pillai AS. An in vitro study to
evaluate and compare the hemocompatibility of titanium and zirconia implant materials
after sandblasted and acid-etched surface treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;
19(12): 1448-1454. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2448
14. Canberra Health Service. Venipuncture Blood Specimen Collection. Canberra: ACT
Government; 2022.
15. Manivasagam V, Popat KC. In Vitro investigation of hemocompatibility of hydrothermally treated titanium and titanium alloy surfaces. ACS Omega. 2020; 5(14): 8108-8120. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00281
16. Pabst A, Asran A, Luers S, Laub M. Osseointegration of a new, ultrahydrophilic
and nanostructured dental implant surface: a comparative in vivo study. Biomedicine. 2022;
10(5): 943. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10050943
17. Potdar R, Ramesh A. Current concepts of surface topography of implants: a review.
Journal of Health and Applied Science. 2022; 12(2): 208-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736284.
18. Manjaiah M, Laubscher RF. A Review of the surface modifications of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Materials and Technology. 2017; 51(2): 181-193. doi: 10.17222/mit.2015.348
19. Hegazy S, Elsabawy M, Eltabakh M, Hammad R. CD62P (P-selectin) expression as a platelet
activation marker in patients with liver cirrhosis with and without cholestasis. Clinical and
Experimental Hepatology. 2021; 7(2): 231-240. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.107566
20. Qu C, Luo F, Hong G, Wan Q. Effects of platelet concentrates on implant stability
and marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;
21:579. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01929-x
21. Bevilacqua L, Faccioni F, Porelli D. Blood wettability of different dental implant surfaces
after different pre-treatments: ultrasonic instrumentation, platelet-rich fibrin coating, and
acid etching. An in vitro study. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(4): 1433. doi: 10.3390/app11041433
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.94366
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 813 | views : 370Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.