Effect of adhesive type, application technique, and immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of lithium disilicate
Viera Seantiga(1*), Tri Endra Untara(2), Diatri Nari Ratih(3)
(1) Conservative Dentistry Specialty Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) is a technique involving the application of adhesive material to freshly prepared dentin for indirect restorations. This method prevents contamination by saliva, debris, and bacteria from penetrating dentinal tubules, which could otherwise compromise the bonding strength of restorative materials. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different adhesive types and application techniques in IDS on the shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate. The adhesive systems investigated included an eighth-generation adhesive and a universal adhesive, each applied using both total-etch and self-etch techniques. Twenty-eight upper premolars were divided into four groups, with buccal crown surfaces prepared for IDS treatment as follows: Group I – eighth-generation adhesive with total-etch; Group II – eighth-generation adhesive with self-etch; Group III – universal adhesive with total-etch; and Group IV – universal adhesive with self-etch. Lithium disilicate was cemented onto the dentin surfaces treated with IDS and then immersed in distilled water for 24 hours prior to SBS testing. The results showed that both adhesive type and application technique significantly influenced SBS (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed among Groups II, III, and IV. However, Group I demonstrated the lowest SBS. In conclusion, the findings indicate that both the choice of adhesive and application technique in IDS significantly affect the shear bond strength of lithium disilicate.
Keywords
Full Text:
4. Viera AnandaReferences
1. Hamdy TM. Modifications of dental adhesive systems. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2018; 9(1): 1-5. doi: 10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00319
2. Elghany HAA, Alrashidy KB, Almuhaymizi AF, Alansari MA, Aljohani HB, Almutairi BK, Shutur HA, Bendagji RA, Redwan MS, Alturkistani MJ, Mahmoud RY. Overview of dental adhesive systems. EC Det. Sci. 2020; 19(12): 110-118.
3. Kazak M, Dönmez N. Development of dentin bonding systems from past to present. Bezmialem Sci. 2019; 7(4):322–330. doi: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2019.3102
4. Abo-Alazm EAEA, Safy RK. Impact of immediate dentin sealing using universal adhesive under simulated pulp pressure on microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composite restorations and dentin permeability. Eur J Dent. 2022; 16(3): 536–542. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735442
5. Leelaponglit S, Maneenacarith A, Wutikhun T, Klaisiri A. The various silane agents in universal adhesives on repair strength of resin composite to resin composite. J Compos Sci. 2023; 7(1): 7. doi: 10.3390/jcs7010007
6. Kim YR, Kim JH, Son SA, Park JK. Effect of silane containing universal adhesives on the bonding strength of lithium disilicate. Materials. 2021; 14(14): 3976. doi: 10.3390/ma14143976
7. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017; 8(1): 1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
8. Carvalho MA, Carvalho PC, Polonial IF, Souza JB, Magne P. Significance of immediate dentin sealing and flowable resin coating reinforcement for unfilled/lightly filled adhesive systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33(1): 88–98. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12700
9. Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S. Immediate dentin sealing: a literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021; 13: 233–256. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S307939
10. Hardan L, Devoto W, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Fernández-Barrera MÁ, Cornejo-Ríos E, Monteiro P, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, Mancino D, Haikel Y, Kharouf N. Immediate dentin sealing for adhesive cementation of indirect restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gels. 2022; 8(3): 175. doi: 10.3390/gels8030175
11. Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. Studervant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 7th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2019
12. Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth, seventh generation bonding agents: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 2(9): 143–147. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124119
13. Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry?. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36(1): 15-26.
14. Leite MM, de Souza DR, Carvalho MA, Lopes LG, de Torres ÉM. Immediate dentin sealing with self-etch dentin bonding agent for indirect restoration. World J Dent. 2017; 8(6): 490–495. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1492
15. Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brother Medical Publisher; 2015.
16. Alothman Y, Bamasoud MS. The success of dental veneers according to preparation design and material type. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(12): 2402–2408. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.353
17. Perdigão J, Araujo E. Anterior veneer restorations - an evidence-based minimal-intervention perspective. J Adhes Dent. 2021; 23(2): 91-110. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b1079529
18. Zarone F, di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1): 134. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x
19. Tyagi R, Kalra N, Khatri A, Yangdol P, Goyal T, Sabherwal P. Lithium disilicate (IPS" e.Max computer-aided design) veneers for the esthetic rehabilitation in a young adolescent. Int J Oral Health Sci. 2022; 12(1): 34-37. doi: 10.4103/ijohs.ijohs_5_22
20. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Philip’s science of dental materials. 12th ed. Florida: Elsevier; 2013.
21. Kesar N, Madan M, Dua P, Saini S, Mangla R, Kumar A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two adhesive systems before and after contamination with oral fluids: An In vitro study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2017; 9(3): 189-193. doi: 10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_29_17
22. Ismail AM, Bourauel C, Elbanna A, Eldin TS. Micro versus macro shear bond strength testing of dentin-composite interface using chisel and wireloop loading techniques. Dent J. 2021; 9(12): 140. doi: 10.3390/dj9120140
23. Tsujimoto A, Shimatani Y, Nojiri K, Barkmeirer WW, Markham MD, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of surface wetness on bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives in etch and rinse mode. Euro J Oral Sci. 2019; 127(2): 1-8. doi: 10.1111/eos.12596
24. Valizadeh S, Moradi A, Mirazei M, Amiri H, Kharazifard MJ. Microshear bond strength of different adhesive systems to dentin. Front Dent. 2019; 16(4): 265-271. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2085
25. Hegde MN, Bhandary S. An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11(2): 71-75. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.44054
26. Han F, Jin X, Yuan X, Bai Z, Wang Q, Xie H. Interactions of two phosphate ester monomers with hydroxyapatite and collagen fibers and their contributions to dentine bond performance. J Dent. 2022; 122: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104159
27. Li R, Ma SQ, Zang CC, Zhang WY, Liu ZH, Sun YC, Feng YY. Enhanced bonding strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement by multiple surface treatments after thermal cycling. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(7): 1-12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220466
28. Chen Y, Tay FR, Lu Z, Chen C, Qian M, Zhang H, Tian F, Xie H. Dipentaerythritol penta-acrylate phosphate – an alternative phosphate ester monomer for bonding of metacrylates to zirconia. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 39542. doi: 10.1038/srep39542
29. Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, Shimatani Y, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci. 2019; 61(4): 549–553. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.18-0433
30. Lijaya VA, Santosa P, Dayinah HS. Perbedaan kekuatan geser pelekatan resin komposit pada dentin menggunakan bonding total etch dan self etch dengan dan tanpa aplikasi klorheksidin diglukonat. J Ked Gi. 2013; 4(2): 156-162.
31. Betancourt DE, Baldion PA, Castellanos JE. Resin-dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer. Int J Biomater. 2019; 2019: 5268342. doi: 10.1155/2019/5268342
32. Mazzoni A, Scaffa P, Carrilho M, Tjäderhane L, Di Lenarda R, Polimeni A. Effects of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Dent. Res. 2013; 92(1): 82–66. doi: 10.1177/0022034512467034
33. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Suzuki T, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of diggerent pre-etching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124(2): 210-218. doi: 10.1111/eos.12253
34. Saikaew P, Sattabanasuk V, Harnirattisai C, Chowdhury AFMA, Carvalho R, Sano H. Role of ther smear layer in adhesive dentistry and the clinical applications to improve bonding performance. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022; 58: 59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.12.001
35. Toshniwal N, Singh N, Dhanjani V, Mote N, Mani S. Self etching systems v/s conventional bonding: advantages, disadvantages. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2019; 5(3): 379-383.
36. Hu X, Luong MH, Zhang H, Zhu H, Chan DCN, Sadr A. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on the dentin bond durability of universal adhesives. J Adh Sci Tech. 2019; 33(21): 2356 – 2368.
37. Rosa WLDO, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43(7): 765-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







