Development of a surgical guide using open-source software for a dental implant placement

https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.96091

Dita Ayu Mayasari(1*), Menik Dwi Kurniatie(2), Wisnu Adi Prasetyanto(3), Shafa Salsa Fadhila(4), Bonifasius Primario Wicaksono(5), Reza Dony Hendrawan(6)

(1) Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia **Center of Medical Innovation, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
(2) *Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia **Center of Medical Innovation, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia
(3) *Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia **Center of Medical Innovation, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia
(4) Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang, Indonesia
(5) Joy Dental Clinic, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(6) GS Dental Clinic, Surabaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Dental technology has advanced significantly in recent years, particularly with regard to the placement of dental implants to replace lost teeth. One such technology is the use of a dental implant guide as a tool to assist with implant installation. The primary purpose of a dental implant guide is to assist the dentist in placing implants with accuracy and precision to maximize operation success and minimize risk of problems. Dental implant guides customized to each patient’s unique tooth and jaw architecture are made possible in large part by digital dentistry. To ensure that the implant is positioned optimally in relation to the patient’s teeth and jaw anatomy, customization is important. Using the AutoDesk meshmixer for modeling and manufacturing, a 3D slicer to segment the mandible using a 3D segmentation approach and 3D printing using resin and filament are all part of the dental implant guide design process. To improve precision and customization in the placement of dental implants, this comprehensive strategy makes use of digital dentistry.

Keywords


clinical engineering; digital dentistry; medical 3D design

Full Text:

Dita Ayu Mayasari


References

1. Rodrigues A, Dhanania S, Rodrigues R. “If I have teeth, I can smile.” Experiences with tooth loss and the use of a removable dental prosthesis among people who are partially and completely edentulous in Karnataka, India. BDJ Open. 2021; 7(1): 34.
doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00088-z

2. Hag Mohamed S, Sabbah W. Is tooth loss associated with multiple chronic conditions?
Acta Odontol Scand. 2023; 81(6): 443–448. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2166986

3. Nulty A. A literature review on prostheticallydesigned guided implant placement and the
factors influencing dental implant success. Br Dent J. 2024; 236(3): 169–180.
doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7050-3

4. Afshari A, Shahmohammadi R, Mosaddad SA, Pesteei O, Hajmohammadi E, Rahbar M, et al. Free-Hand versus Surgical Guide Implant Placement. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022; 2022(1): 6491134. doi: 10.1155/2022/6491134

5. Chandra E, Saleh S, Indrastuti M. The effect of platelet-rich fibrin on the acceleration of
osteoblast proliferation after endosseous dental implant insertion. Majalah Kedokteran
Gigi Indonesia. 2020; 6(1): 55-59. doi: 10.22146/majkedgiind.40046

6. Chen ST, Buser D, Sculean A, Belser UC. Complications and treatment errors in implant
positioning in the aesthetic zone: Diagnosis and possible solutions. Periodontol 2000.
2023; 92(1): 220–234. doi: 10.1111/prd.12474

7. Romandini M, Ruales-Carrera E, Sadilina S, Hämmerle CHF, Sanz M. Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2023; 91(1): 89–112. doi: 10.1111/prd.12440

8. Takács A, Marada G, Turzó K, Nagy Á, Németh O, Mijiritsky E, et al. Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computerassisted implant
surgery? An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1): 575. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03297-0

9. Asymal A, Priaminiarti M, Suryonegoro H, Kiswanjaya B, Bachtiar-Iskandar HH. Observer agreement in temporomandibular joint space measurement using open-source software and commercial software. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research.
2022; 16(4): 1510-1515.

10. Hussaini S, Glogauer M, Sheikh Z, Al-Waeli H. CBCT in dental implantology: a key tool
for preventing peri-implantitis and enhancing patient outcomes. Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(7):
196. doi: 10.3390/dj12070196

11. Dhimole R, Dhamande MM, Kambala SR, Madhu PP. The digital era in dentistry: A
review. Biomedicine; 2023; 43(3): 816–820. doi: 10.51248/.v43i3.2865

12. Ronsivalle V, Ruiz F, Lo Giudice A, Carli E, Venezia P, Isola G, et al. From reverse engineering software to cad-cam systems: how digital environment has influenced the clinical applications in modern dentistry and orthodontics. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(8):
4986. doi: 10.3390/app13084986

13. Takács A, Hardi E, Cavalcante BGN, Szabó B, Kispélyi B, Joób-Fancsaly Á, et al. Advancing
accuracy in guided implant placement: a comprehensive meta-analysis: meta-analysis
evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement methods. J Dent. 2023; 139:
104748. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104748

14. Xiang B, Yu J, Lu J, Yan Z. Comparisons between digital-guided and nondigital protocol in implant planning, placement, and restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. 2023; 23(4): 101919. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101919

15. Zhang J, Jiang Y, Gao F, Zhao S, Yang F, Song L. A Fast automatic reconstruction method for panoramic images based on cone beam computed tomography. Electronics. 2022; 11(15): 2404.
doi: 10.3390/electronics11152404

16. Pervan B, Tomic S, Ivandic H, Knezovic J. MIDOM—A DICOM-based medical image
communication system. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(10): 6075. doi: 10.3390/app13106075

17. Abad-Coronel C, Pazán DP, Hidalgo L, Larriva Loyola J. Comparative analysis between 3D-Printed models designed with generic and dental-specific software. Dent J. 2023; 11(9): 216. doi: 10.3390/dj11090216

18. Suryatal BK, Sarawade SS, Deshmukh SP. Fabrication of medium scale 3D components
using a stereolithography system for rapid prototyping. Journal of King Saud University
- Engineering Sciences. 2023; 35(1): 40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2021.02.012

19. Badanova N, Perveen A, Talamona D. Study of SLA printing parameters affecting the
dimensional accuracy of the pattern and casting in rapid investment casting. J Manuf
Mater Process. 2022; 6(5): 109. doi: 10.3390/jmmp6050109

20. Huang W, Zu Z, Huang Y, Xiang H, Liu X. UV-curing 3D printing of high-performance,
recyclable, biobased photosensitive resin enabled by dual-crosslinking networks. Addit
Manuf. 2024; 91: 104352. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104352

21. Kaur G, Baweja PS, Saini RS, Singh IP, Sharma T, Singh S. Assessment of effect
of implant angulation and implant number on the dimensional accuracy of definitive
casts. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(4): 394–399.

22. Thangwarawut P, Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Kiattavorncharoen S. Comparison of different types of static computer-guided implant surgery in varying bone inclinations. Materials. 2022; 15(9): 3004. doi: 10.3390/ma15093004

23. Huang L, Liu L, Yang S, Khadka P, Zhang S. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study. Int J Implant Dent. 2023; 9(1): 45. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00512-z



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.96091

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3233 | views : 1303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 View My Stats


real time web analytics