Analisis Konflik Kebijakan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja - Policy Conflict Framwork (PCF)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpmmpi.v3i2.66021

Rizky Dwi Lestari(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


After Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja which was called a solution to classic problems such as unemployment and poverty was rolled out by the government, there was a strong reaction from the public against it. The strong reaction started from public disapproval, especially the labor unions in the substance of the RUU, especially the RUU seemed to be forced amidst the uncontrolled Covid 19 pandemic conditions, the situation heated up when the government neglected to open up public spaces in the discussion of the RUU and continued to discuss the RUU at parliament. In the end, policy conflicts could not be avoided between the Pro RUU CK group represented by the government and big businessmen and the Counter RUU CK  group represented by the Labor Union, NGOs and indigenous peoples. To analyze more deeply about the policy conflicts that occur around the RUU CK, the author uses the Policy Conflict Framework (PCF) with the instrument of Policy Settings, Conflict Episodes and Feedback. With PCF, we understand the many dimensions of conflict that are interrelated to the conflict in the RUU CK policy that occurs not only at the level of Substantial Conflict but has been faced with Relational Conflict between State vs Community. In every conflict episode that runs, the two policy coalitions use the Disributive Strategy or Domination so that a common ground between the two cannot be reached.

 




References

Baarveld, Marlijn, Marnix Smit, and Geert Dewulf. 2015. “Negotiation Processes in Urban Redevelopment Projects: Dealing with Conflicts by Balancing Integrative and Distributive Approaches.” Planning Theory and Practice 16 (3): 363–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1058972. 2. Chang, Lieh Ching. 2011. “A Comparison of Taiwanese and Philippine Chinese Business Negotiation Styles.” Social Behavior and Personality 39 (6): 765–72. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.6.765. 3. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset Memilih diantara Lima Pendekatan (terjemahan). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar . 4. Gultom, Andri Fransiskus, and Marsianus Reresi. 2020. “Kritik Warga Pada Ruu Omnibus Law Dalam Paradigma Critical Legal Studies.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 10 (1): 38. https://doi.org/10.20527/kewarganegaraan.v10i1.8497. 5. Heikkila, Tanya, and Christopher M. Weible. 2017. “Unpacking the Intensity of Policy Conflict: A Study of Colorado’s Oil and Gas Subsystem.” Policy Sciences 50 (2): 179–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9285-1. 6. Matompo, Osgar Sahim, and Wafda vivid Izziyana. 2020. “Konsep Omnibus Law Dan Permasalahan RUU Cipta Kerja.” Rechstaat Nieuw (Aturan Hukum Baru) 5 (1): 22–29. file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/(1) KONSEP OMNIBUS LAW DAN PERMASALAHAN RUU CIPTA KERJA.pdf. 7. Preuss, Melanie, and Per van der Wijst. 2017. “A Phase-Specific Analysis of Negotiation Styles.” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 32 (4): 505–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2016-0010. 8. Weible, Christopher M., and Tanya Heikkila. 2017. “Policy Conflict Framework.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9280-6. 9. Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Daniel Nohrstedt, Adam Douglas Henry, and Peter deLeon. 2011. “A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (3): 349–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x. 10. Yuda, Tauchid Komara. 2020. “Re-Examining the Institutional Layering of Social Policy Configuration in Indonesia.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 13 (3): 353–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2019.1662164. 11. Agung wardana, D. L. (2020, 10 13). UU CK, Kontroversi dan Perlawanan . (MAP Corner - Klub MKP. UGM, Interviewer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjFStZdCP4 12. cnnindonesia.com. (2020, 10 06). Epidemiolog : Alasan DPR kebut omnibus law mengada-ngada. Retrieved from cnnindonesia.com: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201006105014-20-554837/epidemiolog-alasan-dpr-kebut-omnibus-law-mengada-ada 13. Dpr.go.id. (2020, 12 15). Program Legislasi Nasional. Retrieved from Dewan Perwakilan rakyat Republik Indonesia : http://www.dpr.go.id/uu/prolegnas-long-list 14. Ilhamsyah, K. K. (2020, 09 01). Benarkan buruh mendukung Omnibus Law ? (MAP Corner - Klub MKP. UGM UGM, Interviewer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-6Uh7qhqEo&t=3267s 15. Inews.id. (2020, 10 09). Jokowi ungkap 3 alasan pemerintah terbitkan omnibus law. Retrieved from Inews.id: https://www.inews.id/news/nasional/jokowi-ungkap-3-alasan-pemerintah-terbitkan-omnibus-law 16. Jumiasih, F. B. (2020, 10 13). UU Omnibus Law, Kontroversi dan Perlawanan. (MAP Corner - Klub MKP. UGM. UGM, Interviewer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjFStZdCP4 17. Kompas.com. (2020, 10 06). Catatan WALHI, UU CK mengancam hutan karena 2 hal ini. Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/06/11343631/catatan-walhi-uu-cipta-kerja-mengancam-keberlangsungan-hutan-karena-2-hal?page=1 18. Kompas.com. (2020, 10 07). INFOGRAFIK: Rekam Jejak Omnibus Law UU Cipta Kerja . Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/10/07/190500565/infografik--rekam-jejak-omnibus-law-uu-cipta-kerja 19. Kompas.com. (2020, 11 03). Ini 6 POin Perubahan Terkait Amdal di UU CK . Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/11/03/09250841/ini-6-poin-perubahan-terkait-amdal-di-uu-cipta-kerja?page=all 20. Kompas.com. (2020, 07 23). Istana : Omnibus law CK didukung pengusaha . Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/07/23/17415891/istana-omnibus-law-cipta-kerja-didukung-penuh-pengusaha 21. Kompas.com. (2020, 10 06). Kenapa pemerintah dan DPR ngotot mengesahkan UU CK ? Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://www.inews.id/news/nasional/jokowi-ungkap-3-alasan-pemerintah-terbitkan-omnibus-law 22. mediaindonesia.com. (2020, 04 09). Tolak Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja, KSPI Ancam Gelar Demo 30 April. Retrieved from mediaindonesia.com: https://mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/302589/tolak-omnibus-law-cipta-kerja-kspi-ancam-gelar-demo-30-april 23. News.detik.com. (2020, 11 03). Perjalanan UU Cipta Kerja: Disahkan DPR hingga Diteken Jokowi. Retrieved from News.detik.com: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5239036/perjalanan-uu-cipta-kerja-disahkan-dpr-hingga-diteken-jokowi 24. Tirto.id. (2020, 02 16). 9 alasan KSPI tolak RUU cipta kerja alias 'cilaka'. Retrieved from Tirto.id: https://tirto.id/9-alasan-kspi-tolak-ruu-cipta-kerja-alias-cilaka-eznu 25. Tirto.id. (2020, 10 12). Rekam Jejak Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja di DPR RI. Retrieved from Tirto.id: https://tirto.id/cara-cek-rekam-jejak-omnibus-law-cipta-kerja-di-web-dpr-dprgoid-f5Rs 26. Weible, T. H. (2017). Policy Conflict Framework. Springer Science+Business Media New York. 27. Weible, T. H. (2017). Unpacking the intensity of policy conflict: a study. Springer Science+Business Media New York. 28. Zainal Arifin, D. H. (2020, 10 13). UU CK, Kobtroversi dan Perlawanan. (MAP Corner - Klub MKP. UGM. UGM, Interviewer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmjFStZdCP4



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpmmpi.v3i2.66021

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1136 | views : 2362

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


_______________________________________________________________________

Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh:

Bidang Jurnal Paradigma Himpunan Mahasiswa Pascasarjana (HMP UGM) Universitas Gadjah Mada

69PF+FWC, Pogung Kidul, Pogung Kidul, Sinduadi, Kec. Mlati, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dengan dukungan dari:

Direktorat Kemahasiswaan Universitas Gadjah Mada
Gedung Pusat UGM, Lantai 1 Sayap Utara, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, Indonesia