Incumbency Disadvantages and Populism in Indonesian Local Elections: Case Studies of Banda Aceh and Takalar

Nurlinah Nurlinah; Rizkika Lhena Darwin; Haryanto Haryanto

doi:10.22146/pcd.35230

Incumbency Disadvantages and Populism in Indonesian Local Elections: Case Studies of Banda Aceh and Takalar

https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.35230

Nurlinah Nurlinah^(1*), Rizkika Lhena Darwin⁽²⁾, Haryanto Haryanto⁽³⁾

(1) Department of Politics and Government, Hasanuddin University
(2) Department of Political Science, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University
(3) Department of Politics and Government, Hasanuddin University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article seeks to contribute an understanding of how populism informs incumbency disadvantages in elections. Incumbency has been seen as highly beneficial in elections, and many studies have found that incumbent candidates enjoy significant access to resources with which they can campaign. This article, however, finds a different reality, with incumbents in Banda Aceh and Takalar experiencing electoral defeat. In both areas, extensive field studies before and after the local elections found that incumbents’ unwillingness to adopt a populist approach during their terms influenced voters’ choices. The main argument of this article is that, in Indonesia’s local democracies, incumbency has created space for varied models of populism, including the communitarian populism found in Aceh and Takalar. Such populism has emerged from specific socio-cultural contexts at the local level that have shaped voters’ preferences. The socio-cultural context of communal societies such as Aceh and Takalar has informed the truth value through which elites, policies, and phenomena are judged. Ultimately, this communitarian populism cannot be separated from the public’s desires for elections. These two cases offer a profile of how communitarian societies respond to and shape local populism in Indonesia.

Keywords

incumbency; populism; communitarianism; local election

Full Text:

PDF

References

Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., &Sonin, K. (2013)."A Political Theory of Populism."The Quarterly Journal of Economics128(2), 771–805.

Aidt, T. S., Golden, M. A., &Tiwari, D. (2011)."Incumbents and Criminals in the Indian National Legislature."Working Paper CWPE 1157.

Anderson, B. (2016).Hidup di LuarTempurung. Jakarta: Marjin Kiri.

Anderson, S. P.,&Glomm, G. (1992)."Incumbency Effects in Political Campaigns."Public Choice74, 207–219.

Anselmi, M. (2018) Populism: An Introduction. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

Ansolabehere, S., & Snyder, J. M. (2002)."The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000". Election Law Journal1(3), 315–338.

Aspinall, E. (2015) "Oligarchic Populism: Prabowo Subianto's Challenge to Indonesian Democracy."Indonesia 99, pp. 1–28.

Aspinall, E. &Sukmajati, M. (eds.). (2016).Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage, and Clientelism at the Grassroots.Singapore: NUS Press.

Campbell, J. E. (1983) "The Return of the Incumbents: The Nature of the Incumbency Advantage."The Western Political Quarterly36(3), 434–444.

Carey, J. M., Niemi, R. G., &Powell, L. W. (2000)."Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections."The Journal of Politics62(3), 671–700.

Cox, G. W. &McCubbins, M. D. (1986)."Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game."Journal of Politics48, 370–389.

Dahlberg, M. &Johansson, E. (2002)."On the Vote Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments."The American Political Science Review 96(1), 27–40.

Darwin, R. L. (2017)."The Power of Female Brokers: Local Elections in North Aceh."Contemporary Southeast Asia39(3), 532–551.

Desposato, S. W. &Petrocik, J. R. (2003)."The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote."American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 18–32.

Dix, R. H. (1984) "Incumbency and Electoral Turnover in Latin America."Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs26(4), 435–448.

Dixit, A. &Londregan, J. (1996)."The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics."Journal of Politics58, 1132–1155.

Djani, L. &Törnquist, O. (2017).Dilemmas of Populist Transactionalism: What are the Prospects Now for Popular Politics in Indonesia? Yogyakarta: PolGov.

Etzioni, A. (2011)."Citizenship in a Communitarian Perspective."Journal of Ethnicities11(3), 336–349.

Ferejohn, J. (1986)."Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control". Public Choice50(1/3), 5–25.

Geertz, C. (1976).The Religion of Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gelman, A. &King, G. (1990)."Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias."American Journal of Political Science34(4), 1142–1164.

Gordon, S. C. &Landa, D. (2009)."Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents?". The Journal of Politics71(4), 1481–1498.

Hartleb, F. (2018). "The Rise of New-Populism in Europe and Asia." In C. Echle, F. Kliem, &M. Sarmah (eds.).Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs. Singapore: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.

Haryanto. (2017)."Adaptation and Continuities in Clientelism in a Fishing Community in Takalar, South Sulawesi."Contemporary Southeast Asia39(3), 511–531.

Hawkins, K. (2003)."Populism in Venezuela: The Rise of Chavismo."Third World Quarterly24(6), 1137–1160.

Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O., &Ostiguy, P. (eds.) (2017) Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kampwirth, K. (ed.). (2010).Gender and Populism in Latin America: Passionate Politics. Penssylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Kenny, P. D. (2017).Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.

Klasnja, M. (2015)."Corruption and the Incumbency Disadvantage: Theory and Evidence."The Journal of Politics. 77(4), 928–942.

Klasnja, M. &Titiunik, R. (2017)."The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability."American Political Science Review, 111(1), 129–148.

Laclau, E. (2005).On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Lay, C., Hanif, H., Ridwan, &N. Rohman (2017)."The Rise of Uncontested Elections in Indonesia: Case Studies of Pati and Jayapura."Contemporary Southeast Asia39(3), 427–448.

Lindbeck, A. &Weibull, J. (1993)."A Model of Political Equilibrium in a Representative Democracy."Journal of Public Economics51, 195–209.

Macdonald, B. (2014) Incumbency Disadvantages in African Politics? Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Zambian Elections. Downloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2325674.

Mas'udi, W. &Kurniawan, N. I. (2017)."Programmatic Politics and Voter Preferences: The 2017 Election in KulonProgo, Yogyakarta". Contemporary Southeast Asia39(3), 449–469.

Mayhew, D. R. (2008)."Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Presidential Elections: The Historical Record."Political Science Quarterly123(2), 201–228.

Mietzner, M. (2014)."How Jokowi Won and Democracy Survived."Journal of Democracy25(4), 111–125.

Mietzner, M. (2015) Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi's Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia. Honolulu: East-West Center.

Mizuno, K. &Phongpaichit, P. (2009).Populism in Asia. Singapore: NUS Press and Kyoto University Press.

Mudde, C. (2004)."The Populist Zeitgeist."Government and Opposition39(4), 541–563.

Mudde, C. (2017)."Populism: An Ideational Approach." In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, &P. Ostiguy(eds.) Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mudde, C. &Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017).Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ostiguy, P. (2017)."Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach." In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy(eds.) Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pratikno &Lay, C. (2011)."From Populism to Democratic Polity: Problems and Challenges in Surakarta, Indonesia."PCD Journal3(1–2), 33–61.

Rosenfield, S. S. (2012)."The Alternative Incumbency Effect: Electing Women Legislators in Indonesia."Electoral Studies31, 576–587.

Rosenfield, S. S. &Hinojosa, M. (2014)."Does Female Incumbency Reduce Gender Bias in Elections? Evidence from Chile". Political Research Quarterly67(4), 837–850.

Savirani, A. (2015)."Consolidated State, Consolidated Business Actors, and New Populist Leaders".In A. Savirani and O. Törnquist (eds.), Reclaiming the State: Overcoming Problems of Democracy in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PolGovand PCD Press.

Savirani, A. &Törnquist, O. (2015).Reclaiming the State: Overcoming Problems of Democracy in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PolGov and PCD Press.

Srimulyani, E. (2013) "Gender in Contemporary Acehnese Dayah: Moving Beyond Docile Agency?"In B. J. Smith &M. Woodward (eds.), Gender and Power in Indonesian Islam: Leaders, Feminists, Sufis and PesantrenSelves. London: Routledge.

Uppal, Y. (2009)."The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures."Public Choice138(1/2), 9–27.

Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics34(1), 1–22.

Weyland, K. (2017)."Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach." InC. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, &P. Ostiguy(eds.) Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.35230