Participation and Contraceptive Use among Women of Childbearing Age in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province: Further Analysis from IDHS 2017

Tuffahati Nadhifa Srihadini; Amiza Husna; Lisa Mustafidatul Fauziah; Heldi Yusup; Wiwik Puji Mulyani; Seri Aryati; Umi Listyaningsih; Sri Rum Giyarsih; Slamet Suprayogi

doi:10.22146/jp.75794

Participation and Contraceptive Use among Women of Childbearing Age in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province: Further Analysis from IDHS 2017

https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.75794

Tuffahati Nadhifa Srihadini^(1*), Amiza Husna⁽²⁾, Lisa Mustafidatul Fauziah⁽³⁾, Heldi Yusup⁽⁴⁾, Wiwik Puji Mulyani⁽⁵⁾, Seri Aryati⁽⁶⁾, Umi Listyaningsih⁽⁷⁾, Sri Rum Giyarsih⁽⁸⁾, Slamet Suprayogi⁽⁹⁾

(1) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(5) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(6) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(7) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(8) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(9) Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Participation and selection of contraceptive methods may vary by region. It depends on the conditions of the region and the characteristics of the population in the region. Decision- making regarding participation and selection of contraceptive methods is influenced by various factors. Based on this description, this study aims to determine participation and selection of contraceptive use in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province based on educational level and number of living children owned by women of childbearing age. This research method uses further analysis of the 2017 Indonesian Health Demographic Survey (IDHS) data for the women of the childbearing age section. The analytical method used is a descriptive analysis by use of cross tabulation with IBM SPSS software. The results of the study indicate that higher education does not necessarily have a high percentage of contraceptive use, however, the variable number of children has an influence on the participation of contraceptives by women of childbearing age. We found that women with ≤ 2 children still want to have more children and tend to use less effective methods (short-term contraceptive method), while women with > 2 children use long-term contraceptive methods as a more effective method because they want to limit the number of children.

Keywords

contraception; level of education; number of children; long-term contraceptive method

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adedini, Sunday A; Olusola Akintoye Omisakin, Oluwaseyi Dolapo Somefun. 2019. “Trends, Patterns and Determinants of Longacting Reversible Methods of Contraception Among Women in Sub-Saharan Africa”. PLoS ONE, 14(4), 1- 16.

Amran, Yuli; and Rita Damayanti. 2018. “Hubungan Antara Motivasi Keluarga Berencana Dan Persepsi Terhadap Alat Kontrasepsi Dengan Pola Penggantian Metode Kontrasepsi di Nusa Tenggara Barat”. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi, 9(1), 59-67.

Anguzu, Ronald; Raymond Tweheyo, Juliet N Sekandi, Vivian Zalwango, Christine Muhumuza, Suzan Tusiime and David Serwadda. 2014. “Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Use of Longacting Reversible Contraceptives Among Women of Reproductive Age in Lubaga Division, Kampala District, Uganda”. BMC Research Notes, 7(153), 2 – 9.

Aryati, Seri; Sukamdi and Dyah Widyastuti. 2019. “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Metode Kontrasepsi (Kasus Di Kecamatan Seberang Ulu I Kota Palembang)”. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 33(1), 79-85.

Bachtiar, Hafidz. 2016. Hubungan Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi terhadap Pemakaian Kontrasepsi dan Fertilitas Menurut Pedesaan dan Perkotaan di Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul. (Undergraduate Thesis). Yogyakarta: Geografi dan Ilmu Lingkungan, Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Bhandari, Rajan; Khrem Nayari Pokhrel, Nguyen Gabrielle and Archana Amartya. 2019. “Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use and Associated Factors Among Married Women of Reproductive Age in Nepal”. PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1- 13.

Biza, Nejimu; Muhammed Abdu and Surender Reddy. 2016. “Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use and Associated Factors Among Contraceptive Users in Amhara Region, Ethiopia, 2016 A Community Based Cross Sectional Study”. Medico Research Chronicles, 4(5), 469 – 480.

Bongaarts, John. 1978. “A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility”. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105 – 132.

Bongaarts, John. 1982. “The Fertility- Inhibiting Effects of the Intermediate Fertility Variables”. Studies in Family Planning, 13(6/7), 179 – 189.

Central Bureau of Statistics. 2021. “Berita Resmi Statistik: Hasil Sensus 2020”. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil- sensus-penduduk-2020.html, accessed on August 2, 2021 at 19.40 WIB.

Davis, Kingsley and Judith Blake. 1956. “Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytic Framework”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4(3), 211 – 235.

Department of Women’s Empowerment, Child Protection and Population Control Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province. 2018. Perubahan RENSTRA 2017 – 2022. Yogyakarta: Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak dan Pengendalian Penduduk Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Dewiyanti, Nur. 2020. “Hubungan Umur dan Jumlah Anak Terhadap Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi di Puskesmas Bulak Banteng Surabaya”. MTPH Journal, 4(1), 70-78.

Easterlin, Richard A. (1975). “An Economic Framework for Fertility Analysis”. Studies in Family Planning, 6(3), 54 – 63.

Fienalia, Rainy Alus. 2012. “Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Pancoran Mas Depok”. (Undergraduate Thesis). Depok: Kesehatan Reproduksi, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia.

Fitrianingsih, Asti Dewi Rahayu and Soenarnatalina Melaniani. 2016. “Faktor Sosiodemografi yang Memengaruhi Pemilihan Metode

Kontrasepsi”. Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan, 5(1), 10 – 18.

Grestasari, Luluk Erdika; Yuli Kusumawati and Kususma Estu Wardani. 2014. “Hubungan antara Tingkat Pendidikan, Pengetahuan, dan Usia Ibu Pus dengan Pemilihan Jenis Kontrasepsi di Desa Jetak Kecamatan Sidoharjo Kabupaten Sragen”. (Doctoral dissertation). Surakarta: Doctoral dissertation Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Hamarisa, Dewi; Nurlina Tarmizi and Maryadi. 2019. “Gambaran Wanita Usia Subur (WUS) Pengguna IUD dan Implant di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2016”. Demography Journal of Sriwijaya, 2(1), 18-24.

Herawati, Rika. 2014. “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Rendahnya Pemakaian KB Implan Di Desa Margamulya Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Rambah Samo I Tahun 2013”. Jurnal Maternity and Neonatal, 1(3), 196-209.

Huda, Andari Nurul; Laksmono Widagdo and Bagoes Widjanarko. 2016. “Faktor- Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi Pada Wanita Usia Subur Di Puskesmas Jombang-Kota Tangerang Selatan”. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 4(1), 461- 469.

Indonesia, P.R., 2003. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Indonesian Ministry of Health. 2018. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2017. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Health.

Kungu, Wambui; Anne Khasakhala and Alfred Agwanda. 2020. “Use of

Long- Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents and Young Women in Kenya”. PLoS ONE, 15(11), 1 –16

Laksmini, Puji. 2017. “Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang (MKJP) di Pulau Jawa (Analisis Data SDKI 2012)”. Jurnal Persada Husada Indonesia, 12.

Lestari, Eka Rahayu Puji; Endah Kusumawati and Hela Safaringga. 2015. “Deskripsi Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Rendahnya Cakupan Peserta KB Aktif Pada Pemantauan Wilayah Setempat Kesehatan Ibu Dan Anak (Pws-kia)”. Asuhan Kesehatan: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kebidanan dan Keperawatan, 6(1), 21- 35.

Lestari, Vivin Ayu and Eka Larasati Amalia. 2021. “Implementasi Fuzzy Inference System untuk Menentukan Alat Kontrasepsi Keluarga Berencana”. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 10(1), 239-249.

Listyaningsih, Umi; Sumini, and Sonyaruri Satiti. 2016. “Unmet Need: Konsep Yang Masih Perlu Diperdebatkan”. Populasi, 24(1), 72-90.

Mahmudah, Laras Tsany Nur and Fitri Indrawati. 2015. “Analisis Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemilihan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang (MKJP) pada Akseptor KB Wanita di Kecamatan Banyubiru Kabupaten Semarang”. UNNES Journal of Public Health,4(3), 76 – 83.

Mufdlilah and Kanthi Aryekti. 2018. “Factors Causing Contraceptive Acceptors Drop Out”. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal, 12(4), 202 – 206.

National Population and Family Planning Commission. 2020. Rencana Strategis BKKBN 2020 – 2024. Jakarta: National Population and Family Planning Commission

Pasang, Elis Sampe. 2020. “Pengaruh Dukungan Suami Terhadap Kejadian Unmet Need Pada Pasangan Usia Subur di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Bangkelekila Kabupaten Toraja Utara”. (Theses). Makassar: Magister of Public Health, Post-Graduated School, Universitas Hasanuddin.

Prijatni, Ida and Sri Rahayu. 2016. Kesehatan Reproduksi dan Keluarga Berencana. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI.

Putri, Rani Pratama; Ratna Dewi Puspita Sari and Putu Ristyaning Ayu. 2019. “Perbandingan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penggunaan Kontrasepsi Intra Uterine Devices (IUD) dan Kontrasepsi Implant pada Wanita Usia Subur di Kecamatan Sukarame Kota Bandar lampung”. Jurnal Majority, 8(2), 120-124.

Rotinsulu, Fioren; Fredy Wagey and Hermie Tendean. 2021. “Gambaran Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi pada Wanita di Indonesia”. e-Clinic, 9(1), 243-249.

Saragih, Imelda Margaretha; Suharto and Arwinda Nugraheni. 2018. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Pemilihan Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Non IUD pada Akseptor KB Wanita Usia Subur Di Kelurahan Bandarharjo Semarang Utara”. Diponegoro Medical Journal (Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro), 7(2), 1236-1250.

Secura, Gina and Colleen McNicholas. 2013. “Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Among Teens Prevents Unintendedpregnancy: A Look at The Evidence”. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 8(4), 297 – 299.

Septalia, Rendy and Nunik Puspitasari. 2016. “Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Alat Kontrasepsi”. Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan, 5(2), 91-98.

Suryanti, Yuli. 2019. “Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang Wanita Usia Subur”. Jambura Journal of Health Science and Research, 1(1), 20- 29.

Tibaijuka, Leevan; Robert Odongo, Emma Welikhe, Wilber Mukisa, Lilian Kugonza, Imelda Busingye, Phelomena Nabukalu, Joseph Ngonzi,

Stephen B. Asiimwe and Francis Bajunirwe. 2017. “Factors Influencing Use of Long-Acting Versus Short-Acting Contraceptive Methods Among Reproductive-Age Women in A Resource-Limited Setting”. BMC Women’s Health, 17(25), 1 – 13.

Uljanah, Khaerunnisa; Sri Winarni and Atik Marwani. 2016. “Hubungan Faktor Risiko Kejadian Unmeet Need KB (Keluarga Berencana) Di Desa Adiwerna, Kecamatan Adiwerna, Kabupaten Tegal, Triwulan III Tahun 2016”. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 4(4), 201-212.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 52 Tahun 2009 tentang Perkembangan Kependudukan dan Pembangunan Keluarga.

Utami, Fitriana Putri; Matahari Ratu and Sugiharti Sri. 2020. “Akses Pasangan Usia Subur (PUS) Miskin terhadap Informasi Keluarga Berencana (KB) di Kota Yogyakarta”. Populasi, 28(1), 63-77.

Witono and Suparna Parwodiwiyono. 2020. “Kepesertaan Keluarga Berencana Pada Masa Awal Pandemi Covid-19 di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”. Pancanaka: Jurnal Kependudukan dan Sumberdaya Manusia, 1(2), 77-78.

Wulandari, Taat. 2008. “Persepsi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Program Keluarga Berencana”. Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, 2(1), 77-100.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.75794