JEFFERSON AND TOCQUEVILLE ON DEMOCRACY AS HEMISPERIC VIEWS
Didik Murwantono(1*)
(1) College of Languages, Sultan Agung Islamic, Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper examines democracy to Jefferson’s and Tocqueville’s philosophy in shaping the American polity. A few scholars have discussed the connection between Jefferson and Tocqueville, but this writing provides a value of democracy as hemispheric mind or trans-national sources. Democracy is not only an American intellectual mind, but also a global mind. The philosophers, sociologists, and economists of the eighteenth and the early part of the nineteenth century formulated a political program that served as a guide to social policy first in the United States, then on the European continent, and finally in the other parts of the inhabited world as well. It was reflected in Tocqueville’s journey for learning democracy in America around the mid of the nineteenth century. Therefore, there are two significant points to describe both Tocqueville and Jefferson; they are democracy and tradition with all conditions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfian, T. I. (2010). Metode Sejarah. Metode dan Metodologi Sejarah. Perkuliahan Kelas Theory and Method of American Studies Research by Djuhertati Imam Muhni.
Appleby, Joyce O. & Terence Ball eds. (1999). Thomas Jefferson, Political Writings, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baradat, Leon P. (1984). Political Ideologies: Their Origins and Impact. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Boesche, Roger. (1980). The Prison: Tocqueville’s Model for Despotism”. Western Political Quarterly, 33, p.550-563.
Budiman, A. (1999). The 1998 Crisis: Change and Continuity in Indonesia, Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indonesia. Australia: Monash Asia Institute.
Coleman et. al. (2012). IT Matters American Government: Understanding American Politics and Government. USA: Pearson Ltd.
Davies, A.Z., and F. Stratton. (1984). How to Teach Poetry: An African Perspective. London: Heinemann.
Dolence, David M. (2006). Tocquevillian Political Associations, Social Capital, and the Centralizing Tendency of Democracy in the United Sates. Diss. USA: Northern Illinois University.
Fukuyama, Francis. (1992). The End of History and The Last Man. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 3. No. 2. April.
Gannett, Jr. Robert. (2003). Bowling Ninepins in Tocqueville’s Township. American Political Science Review, 97: p.1-16.
Hartz, Louis. (1995). The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Kahan, Alan S. (1992). Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koritansky, John C. (1975). Decentralization and Civic Virtue in Tocqueville’s ‘New Science of Politics. Publius, 5. Spring. p. 63-81.
Koch, G. Adolf. (1973). Republican Religion: The American Revolution and the Cult of Reason. New York: Henry Holt.
Laurenson, Diana and Alan Swingewood. (1972). The Sociology of Literature. Great Britain: MacGibbon & Kee Ltd.
Logue, William. (1983). Philosophy to Sociology: The Evolution of French Liberalism, 1870-1914 (DeKalb: NIU), USA.
Lohof, Bruce. A. (1978). Through the Eyes of the World: International essay in American Studies. Delphi: The Macmillan Compa ny of Indian Ltd.
Macpherson, C.B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maddox, Graham. (1987). Australian Democracy: In Theory and Practice. Malaysia: United Book Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur.
Mas’oed, Mohtar. (2004). Challenges to Democratic Accountability in Post New Order Indonesia. International Seminar: Democratic Accountability. Yogyakarta, June 5.
McDowell, Tremaine. (1984). American Studies. Minneapolis: the University of Minnesota Press.
Nevins, Allan and Henry S. Commager. (1986). Thomas Jefferson. A Pocket History of the United States. New York: Washington Square Press.
Payne, Richard J. and Jamal R. Nasser. (2003). Politics and Culture in the Developing World. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Peterson, Merrill D, Ed. (1984). Jefferson Writings, Autobiography, Notes on the State of Virginia, Public and Private Papers, Addresses Letters. New York: The Library of America.
Purcell, Richard J. (1963). Connecticut in Transition: 1775-1818. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan U. Press.
Rowe, John Carlos. (2010). “Introduction” A Concise Companion to American Studies. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Smith, Adam. (2000). The Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library. Smith, Henry Nash. (1980). Studies in American Culture. Ed. Joseph J. Kwiat & Mary C. Turpie. USA: University of Minnesota.
Stone, John and Stephen Mennel. ed. (2005). Alexis De Tocqueville on Democracy, Revolution, and Society. Trans. Yusi A. Pareanom. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor
Tocqueville, Alexis de. (1956). Democracy in America. Ed. Richard D. Heffner. New York: The Penguin Group.
Wolin, Sheldon S. (2001). Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of Political and Theoretical Life. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wood, Ellen Meiksins. (2002). The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View. London: Verso Inc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v1i1.34158
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1109 | views : 2558Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2014 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.