A Study of the Individualism Accounts on American Literature through Reader Response Criticism

Didik Murwantono

doi:10.22146/rubikon.v9i2.78146

A Study of the Individualism Accounts on American Literature through Reader Response Criticism

https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v9i2.78146

Didik Murwantono^(1*)

(1) Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study is by no means a comprehensive account of individualism or more accurately, individualism, in America. It is intended to be more suggestive than comprehensive though it is characterized by more summery than controversy. Many ideas as well as some of the highlights of American manifestations of individualism and modes of individualistic thought and philosophy have been added. What follows, then, is merely a look at some of the high-water marks of literary American individualism and an attempt to offer some cursory explanations for this American phenomenon in theory and practice. This study was under an exploratory qualitative method supported by an interdisciplinary approach of American Studies. Reader-Response criticism is used to make perspective and interpretation without a doubt. The sample was 28 students taking the American Society and literature course at the Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang. The completion of this research shows the students have creativity and freedom to express their innovation in learning American literature. The cornerstone of individual conscience has to be their credos for changing into a better life through the social, political, economic, and moral autonomy of each individual.

Keywords

American Literature; Individualism; Reader Response; Transcendentalism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhitya, G. N., Rosmawati, D., & Fainnayla, T. S. (2022). Streaming laughter: A linguistic analysis on Kevin Hart’s stand up comedy special Zero F**ks Given. Rubikon: Journal of Transnational American Studies, 9(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v9i1.73550.

Althen, G. (1998). American Ways: A Guide for Foreigners in the United States. Intercultural Press, Inc.

Bressier, C. E. (1999). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Cohen, D., & Kim, E. (2020). Sublimation (Defense Mechanism). In Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1430

Collective, T. T. (2020). The Palgrave handbook of twentieth and twenty-first century literature and science. In The Palgrave Handbook of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Literature and Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48244-2

Cooper, R., Fleisher, A., & Cotton, F. A. (2012). Building connections: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of qualitative research students’ learning experiences. The Qualitative Report, April 23.

Cudd, A., & Eftekhari, S. (2021). Contractarianism : substantive revision. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (The Metaph). Department of Philosophy, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism/

Daniels, E. (2011). CH A P T E R A Brief history of individualism in American thought. In A brief history of individualism in American thought (p. 70). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116269_5

Davydov, D. A. (2022). Global trends postcapitalism: From consumer individualism to expressive individualism?. Herald of the Russian academy of sciences, 92(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622120036

Eze, E. C. (2002). Answering the question, “What remains of Enlightenment?” Human studies, 15, 281–288.

Heath, M. P. (2019). John Locke: The individual rights meme. In The Christian roots of individualism (pp. 213–242). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30089-0_9

Jon, H. B. (1997). The Protestant ethic: Weber’s Model and the empirical literature. Human relations, 50(7), 757–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016960423653

Kimmel, M., & Gardiner, J. K. (2017). Global masculinities series editors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50820-7_2

Kleinfeld, J., & Kleinfeld, A. (2004). Cowboy nation and American character. Society, 41(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02690182

Kohl, H. (1992). From archetype to zeitgeist: Powerful ideas for powerful thinking. Little Brown and Company.

Martin, J. J. (2004). Myths of Renaissance individualism. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-53575-6

Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning : a design problem. Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research, 1(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6

Plotica, L. P. (2018). Emerson and self-reliance: Individualism amidst the market. In Nineteenth-century individualism and the market economy (p. 71). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62172-2_3

Rohmann, C. (1999). A world of ideas: A dictionary of important theories, concepts, beliefs, and thinkers. Ballatine Books.

Rowe, J. C. (2012). The cultural politics of the New American Studies. Open Humanities Press.

Rudy. & Adhitya, G. N. (2022). Fashioning the gays: A representation study on the gay protagonists in the 2000s gay-themed Althen, G. (1998). American Ways: A Guide for Foreigners in the United States. Intercultural Press, Inc.