Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum
https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JCEF
<p style="text-align: justify;">Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum (JCEF) is a four-monthly journal on Civil and Environmental Engineering related sciences. The JCEF is devoted to publish and disseminate research in the fields of structural engineering, geotechnical engineering, water resources engineering, environmental engineering, transportation engineering, and construction management.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">The particular emphasis of JCEF is given to the civil & environmental researches associated with disasters caused by natural hazards such as geo-disaster (earthquake, landslide, volcanic eruption), water-related disaster (flood, debris flow, coastal disaster, tsunami), and human-made hazards such as soil, water, and air pollution and water scarcity in a tropical region. Articles describing the topics of disaster risk reduction techniques, disaster early warning system, climate change adaptation, vulnerability analysis and trends, pre and/or post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation planning and management, forensic engineering, the socio-engineering approach for the countermeasures, or water reuse and recycle are particularly encouraged.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">JCEF is open access journal and free of charge for submission, publication, and download. There are three categories of articles published in JCEF: Research Articles, Technical Notes, Editorial Note, and Review Articles. The article consists of 6 - 12 pages, 6 - 10 articles per issue, reviewed by selected peer-reviewers.</p> <p> </p>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Madaen-USJournal of the Civil Engineering Forum2581-1037<p>Copyright is granted to authors for the purpose of providing protection for articles written to describe experiments and their results. JCEF will protect and defend the work and reputation of the author and are also willing to address any allegations of violation, plagiarism, fraud, etc. against articles written and published by JCEF. JCEF is published under the terms of the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a> (CC BY-SA 4.0). The author holds the copyright and assigns the journal rights to the first publication (online and print) of the work simultaneously.</p>Effect of Relative Density Variation on The Effectiveness of Fly Ash in Stabilization of Sandy Soils for Liquefaction Mitigation
https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JCEF/article/view/26551
<p>Indonesia is highly vulnerable to earthquakes that can trigger soil liquefaction, particularly in coastal regions where saturated sandy soils with low relative densities are prevalent. This study investigated the influence of varying Class C fly ash contents (5%, 10%, and 15%), relative densities (50%, 70%, and 90%), and curing periods (7 and 14 days) on the unconfined compressive strength of fully saturated sandy soils as a liquefaction mitigation approach. The methodology included physical soil characterization, sample preparation with specific fly ash and relative density variations, and unconfined compressive strength testing after the curing period. The results demonstrated that increasing the fly ash content, relative density, and curing time significantly enhanced the strength of the samples. The highest strength occurred at 15% fly ash and 90% relative density, with 426.22 kPa (7 days) and 438.57 kPa (14 days). The most notable improvement occurred with an increase in fly ash content from 5% to 10% and relative density from 50% to 70%. Fly ash was more effective at enhancing the strength of sandy soil by promoting interparticle cementation, whereas excessive compaction tended to disrupt the soil structure and generate fine particles that reduced cohesion, as evidenced by the UCS test results and SEM observations. The most significant strength gain between 7 and 14 days was observed at 50% relative density and 5% fly ash, with a twofold increase. The combination of 10% fly ash and 70% relative density was optimal for field implementation, as it yielded strength values exceeding the liquefaction resistance thresholds, while maintaining practical compaction levels and material efficiency. A comparative cost assessment considering materials, labor, equipment, and construction time is recommended to evaluate the practical feasibility of fly ash stabilization relative to alternative ground improvement methods for Indonesian projects.</p>Yunan Yakuta Wangsawitana Muhammad Fauzan Heriansyah PutraErizalMinson Simatupang
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-05-042026-05-0429330410.22146/jcef.26551Real-time Application and Statistical Evaluation of Reservoir Operating Rules Under Inflow Uncertainty in Monte Carlo Simulations
https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JCEF/article/view/24906
<p>Reservoir Operating Rules (ROR) have been well-known in Indonesia as guidelines for reservoir operation that comprise the release rules and rule curves derived from the dependable inflow time series in dry, normal, and wet conditions. However, likely because of the incoherence of the original application concept of ROR, the real performance of ROR in reservoir operation has so far remained unclear. This paper proposes a practical application concept of ROR and evaluates the performance of its implementation for annual storage conservation and periodic demand satisfaction under inflow uncertainty in the integrated system of Segawe Regulating Weir, Wonorejo Multipurpose Dam, and Tiudan Regulating Dam. The release rules for the three hydraulic structures were integrated into a unified “Wonorejo ROR”throughoptimization of water allocation over 36 ten-day operational periods. The performance of the application of Wonorejo ROR was evaluated based on several operational success and failure events in Monte Carlo simulations, for which 1,000 years of unique and independent synthetic inflow time series were generated from the Thomas–Fiering model. Under the application concept of ROR, the release decisions for the three hydraulic structures were made in real-time solely based on the actual water level of Wonorejo Reservoir and the rule curves of Wonorejo ROR. For comparative purposes, the Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to evaluate two alternatives of Wonorejo ROR, namely ROR-D65 and ROR-D80, which had different dry inflow exceedance probabilities. Based on the specified events in the Monte Carlo simulations, ROR-D65 and ROR-D80 resulted in reliabilities of 76.4% and 81.3% for annual storage conservation, and the lowest reliabilities of 73.9% and 52.4% for periodic demand satisfaction, respectively. In addition, other reservoir operational performancesandacomprehensive interpretation oftheproposed applicationconcept of ROR arepresented in this paper.</p>Muhammad MujiburrakhmanRachmad JayadiIstiartoIndra Nurdianyoto
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-06-182026-06-1830532210.22146/jcef.24906Analyzing Trends and Framework Models for Autonomous Vehicle Transition Strategies
https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JCEF/article/view/26609
<p>The shift from traditional human-driven to autonomous vehicles represents a transformation that is not merely technological, but also social. Currently, the deployment of autonomous vehicles remains largely at level where the human driver continues to be the primary decisionmaker. However, this dynamic is expected to change significantly as higher levels of autonomy are achieved. This study aims to identify the impacts that occur during process transition through emerging trends and theoretical lens of transition studies. The initial stage involved mapping trends in Autonomous Vehicle (AV) research to identify key related topics. This study uses bibliometric analysis of 82 key articles selected through a screening process in a systematic review. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were employed to map the research landscape, identify dominant topics, and trace the evolution of AV studies over time. The analysis highlights both well-established research areas and underexplored gaps. Furthermore, the articles were classified into categories based on transition study dimensions and key actors involedinvolved in facilitating a successful transition. The findings reveal a dominant research focus on users, human factors, and mobility behavior, whereas studies concerning vulnerable road users and the industry transition remain limited. To address this gap, this study investigates the socio-technical factors arising from the identified trends and transition studies while also exploring the roles of key stakeholders. This approach aims to achieve a more balanced perspective. Specifically, the study proposes a novel framework that connects critical actors with core socio-technical dimensions to support a sustainable autonomous ve-hicle transition. This research thus provides a strategic framework designed to guide and accelerate the shift toward autonomous mobility.</p>Cintia NurliyanaYuliani Dwi LestariEko Agus PrasetioPrawira Fajarindra Belgiawan
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
2026-07-012026-07-0132334810.22146/jcef.26609