Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making for Classifying Entrepreneurial Potential based on Theory of Planned Behavior
Abstract
Indonesia government has launched a program to encourage youth entrepreneurship as a strategy to improve national economy. This paper proposes a method to find an entrepreneurial potential based on academic behavior features that are extracted from the Higher Education Database PDDikti. The proposed approach applies the Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) technique. Rules for extracting features of student academic behavior were following Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and resulting in 14 features. The FMADM model combines Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, which is called FSAW-TOPSIS. Friedman Test demonstrated that FSAW-TOPSIS gives more optimal solution with the highest Mean Rank of the potential entrepreneurial value of 2.96. Besides, through Hamming Distance Test, FSAW-TOPSIS results the best order with a 98% percentage and ranking of the smallest Squared Error of 0.3%, which makes the proposed model offered a better solution. It can be concluded that using TPB variables in PDDikti environment with FSAW-TOPSIS technique provides an optimal recommendation on student entrepreneurship potential, which can be used as a part of a decision-making system for higher education management.
References
I. Ajzen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Org Behav Hum. Decis. Proc, Vol. 50, No. 2, hal. 179-211, 1991.
S. Karimi, J.H. Biekmans, K.N. Mahdei, T. Lans, C. Mohammed, dan M. Mulder, “Testing the Relationship Between Personality Characteristics, Contextual Factors and Entrepreneurial Intentions in a Developing Country,” Int. J. Psychol., Vol. 52, No. 3, hal. 227–240, 2015.
I. Joseph, “Factors Influencing International Student Entrepreneurial Intention in Malaysia,” Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., Vol. 7, No. 4, hal. 424–428, 2017.
L. Suharti dan H. Sirine, “Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Niat Kewirausahaan (Entrepreneurial Intention) (Studi terhadap Mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga),” J. Manaj. dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 13, No. 2, hal. 124–134, 2011.
Yohnson, “Peranan Universitas dalam Memotivasi Sarjana menjadi Young Entrepreneurs,” J. Manaj. Kewirausahaan, Vol. 5, No. 2, hal. 97–111, Sep. 2003.
S. Wu dan L. Wu, “The impact of Higher Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions of University Students in China,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., Vol. 15, No. 4, hal. 752–774, 2008.
K.R. Suwena, “Pentingnya Penilaian Potensi Diri Wirausaha sebagai Pondasi untuk Mensukseskan Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha (PMW),” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Hum., Vol. 4, No. 2, hal. 651–660, 2015.
N. Rijati, S. Sumpeno, dan M. H. Purnomo, “Multi-Attribute Clustering of Student’s Entrepreneurial Potential Mapping Based on Its Characteristics and the Affecting Factors (Preliminary Study on Indonesian Higher Education Database),” Proc. - ICCAE 2018 2018 10th nt. Conf. Comput. Autom. Eng., 2018, hal. 11–16.
C. Chen dan C.M. Klein, “An Efficient Approach to Solving Fuzzy MADM Problems,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 88, No. 1, hal. 51–67, 1997.
F. Al-Obeidat, A. Tubaishat, A. Dillon, dan B. Shah, “Analyzing Students’ Performance Using Multi-criteria Classification,” Cluster Comput., Vol. 21, hal. 623–632, 2018.
G.A.M.S. Wimatsari, I.K.G.D. Putra, dan P.W. Buana, “Multi-Attribute Decision Making Scholarship Selection Using A Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS,” Int. J. Comput. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 1, hal. 309–317, 2013.
A.A. Hartono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan pada Penjurusan Siswa Terkendala dengan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process,” J. Nas. Tek. Elektro dan Teknol. Inf., Vol. 3, No. 3, hal. 194–200, 2014.
R.F. de Farias Aires, L. Ferreira, A.G. de Araujo, dan D. Borenstein, “Student Selection in a Brazilian University: Using a Multi-criteria Method,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., Vol. 69, No. 4, hal. 528–540, 2018.
S.M.H. Hojjati dan A. Anvary, “An Integrated SAW, TOPSIS Method for Ranking the Major Lean Practices Based on Four Attributes,” World Appl. Sci. J., Vol. 28, No. 11, hal. 1862–1871, 2013.
P. Wang, Z. Zhu, dan Y. Wang, “A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA Methods Based on Experimental Design,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., Vol. 345, hal. 27–45, 2016.
H.G.H. Selim, “Integrating Multi-criteria Decision Making and Clustering for Business Customer Segmentation,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., Vol. 115, No. 6, hal. 1022–1040, 2015.
G. Kou, Y. Peng, dan G. Wang, “Evaluation of Clustering Algorithms for Financial Risk Analysis Using MCDM Methods,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., Vol. 275, hal. 1–12, 2014.
S.-T. Wang, “An Analysis of the Optimal Customer Clusters Using Dynamic Multi-Objective Decision,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., Vol. 17, No. 2, hal. 547–582, 2018.
B. Rouba dan S.N. Bahloul, “A Multicriteria Clustering Approach Based on Similarity Indices and Clustering Ensemble Techniques,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., Vol. 13, No. 4, hal. 811–837, 2014.
S. Huda, R. Sarno, dan T. Ahmad, “Fuzzy MADM Approach for Rating of Process-Based Fraud,” J. ICT Res. Appl., Vol. 9, No. 2, hal. 111–128, 2016.
I. Ajzen, Attitudes, Personality and Behavior, 2nd ed., New York, USA: Open University Press Mc Graw Hill Education, 2005.
M. Fishbien dan I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
J. Lortie dan G. Castogiovanni, “The Theory of Planned Behavior in Entrepreneurship Research: What We Know and Future Directions,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., Vol. 11, No. 4, hal. 935–957, 2015.
W.J. Aloulou, “Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions of Final Year Saudi University Business Students by Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., Vol. 23, No. 4, hal. 1142–1164, 2016.
C.W. Utami, “Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavior, Entrepreneurship Education and Self-efficacy Toward Entrepreneurial Intention University Student in Indonesia,” Eur. Res. Stud. J., Vol. 20, No. 2, hal. 475–495, 2017.
A. Heuer dan L. Kolvereid, “Education in Entrepreneurship and the Theory of Planned Behaviour,” Eur. J. Train. Dev., Vol. 38, No. 6, hal. 506–523, 2014.
F. Liñán dan A. Fayolle, “A Systematic Literature Review on Entrepreneurial Intentions: Citation, Thematic Analyses, and Research Agenda,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., Vol. 11, No. 4, hal. 907–933, 2015.
D. Maresch, R. Harms, N. Kailer, dan B. Wimmer-Wurm, “The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students in Science and Engineering Versus Business Studies University Programs,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, Vol. 104, hal. 172–179, 2016.
H. Sun, C.T. Lo, B. Liang, dan Y.L.B. Wong, “The Impact of Entrepreneurial Education on Entrepreneurial Intention of Engineering Students in Hong Kong” Management Decision, Vol. 55, No. 7, hal. 1371–1393, 2017.
M. Küttim, M. Kallaste, U. Venesaar, dan A. Kiis, “Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., Vol. 110, hal. 658–668, 2014.
V. Barba-Sánchez dan C. Atienza-Sahuquillo, “Entrepreneurial Intention Among Engineering Students: The Role of Entrepreneurship Education,” Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., Vol. 24, No. 1, hal. 53–61, 2018.
C. Botsaris dan V. Vamvaka, “Attitude Toward Entrepreneurship: Structure, Prediction from Behavioral Beliefs, and Relation to Entrepreneurial Intention,” J. Knowl. Econ., Vol. 7, No. 2, hal. 433–460, 2016.
I. Kaliszewski dan D. Podkopaev, “Simple Additive Weighting - A Metamodel for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Methods,” Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 54, hal. 155–161, 2016.
Y. Melia, “Multi Attribute Decision Making Using Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product in Investment,” Int. Acad. J. Bus. Manag., Vol. 3, No. 2, hal. 58–72, 2016.
R. Umar, Sunardi, dan Y.B. Fitriana, “Taxonomy of Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Systems in Terms of Model, Inventor and Data Type,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., Vol. 8, No. 1, hal. 2568–2571, 2018.
K. Savitha dan C. Chandrasekar, “Vertical Handover Decision Schemes Using SAW and WPM for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,” Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 9, hal. 19–24, 2011.
A. Karami, “Utilization and Comparison of Multi Attribute Decision Making Techniques to Rank Bayesian Network Options,” University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden, Master Degree Proj. hal. 1-58, 2011.
Y. Suparman, “Perlukah Cross Validation dilakukan? Perbandingan antara Mean Square Prediction Error dan Mean Square Error sebagai Penaksir Harapan Kuadrat Kekeliruan Model,” Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika 2009, 2009, hal. 833–839.
© Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.png)
