GSA With Factor Screening for Performance Evaluation of Transmission Line Protection Relays

  • Nanang Rohadi Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45364, Indonesia
  • Bambang Mukti Wibawa Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45364, Indonesia
  • Nendi Suhendi Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45364, Indonesia
Keywords: Relay Performance, Intelligent Electronic Devices, Global Sensitivity Analysis, Morris Method, DIgSILENT Program Language

Abstract

This paper presents a global sensitivity analysis with factor screening to efficiently test conventional distance relay algorithm models used as transmission line protection devices with series compensators. Various system indeterminacy parameters (factors) may affect the functional performance of the fault impedance measurement algorithm model of intelligent electronic devices, specifically the SEL-421 type distance relays. The purpose of global sensitivity testing is to determine the influence strength of individual and interacting factors on the output of the fault impedance measurement algorithm.  Global sensitivity analysis, conducted through variance analysis using quasi-Monte Carlo methods, aims to compute the error in fault impedance measurement results. As an initial step, the Morris method was employed to filter out factors that did not predominantly affect relay performance, thereby reducing the computational burden of the global sensitivity analysis. Several simulated transmission line faults with series compensators and multiple factors were modeled using DIgSILENT PowerFactory. Automatic fault simulations, both before and after compensators, were developed using DIgSILENT Programming Language. The sensitivity of the relay algorithm output was tested for each simulation based on read-out voltage, fault current signals, and the values of sampled factors using both Morris and Sobol methods. The variance of the algorithm output model influenced by several factors was calculated using SIMLAB software. Fault resistance emerged as the dominant factor affecting algorithm performance, with sensitivity indices exceeding 0.9 and 0.7 for faults before and after the compensator, respectively. This technique has effectively tested the SEL-421 distance relay algorithm.

References

A. Purohit and V. Gohokar, “Maloperation of distance relay under faulty conditions in presence of static synchronous series compensator,” 2019 IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Power Energy Appl. (ICPEA), 2019, pp. 66–70, doi: 10.1109/ICPEA.2019.8818520.

D.K. Ibrahim, G.M. Abo-Hamad, E.E.-D.M.A. Zahab, and A.F. Zobaa, “Comprehensive analysis of the impact of the TCSC on distance relays in interconnected transmission networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 228315–228325, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046532.

N. Rohadi and N. Suhendi, “Investigasi kinerja relai proteksi saluran transmisi dengan kompensator seri,” J. Nas. Tek. Elekt. Teknol. Inf., vol 12, no.3, pp. 190–196, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.22146/jnteti.v12i3.4810.

A. Kalita, “Overreaching of reactive reach in distance protection relay for faults involving earth path and soil resistivity as a limiting determinant,” 2022 22nd Nat. Power Syst. Conf. (NPSC), 2022, pp. 385–389, doi: 10.1109/NPSC57038.2022.10069392.

N. Rohadi, N. Suhendi, and L.K. Men, “Teknik pengujian kinerja algoritma relay jarak menggunakan DIgSILENT,” J. Nas. Tek. Elekt. Teknol. Inf., vol 10, no. 1, pp. 85–90, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.22146/jnteti.v10i1.735.

Y. Liang et al., “A novel fault impedance calculation method for distance protection against fault resistance,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 396–407, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2019.2920690.

I. Ahmad et al., “Sensitivity analysis of entrained flow coal gasification process through Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) and Sobol techniques,” 2018 Int. Conf. Appl. Eng. Math. (ICAEM), 2018, pp. 79–84, doi: 10.1109/ICAEM.2018.8536285.

A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto, Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.

Y. Zhou et al., “Candidate bus selection method for VAR planning of wind-penetrated power system based on Morris screening method,” 2019 IEEE 3rd Conf. Energy Internet Energy Syst. Integr. (EI2), 2019, pp. 2487–2492, doi: 10.1109/EI247390.2019.9061879.

SEL-421 Relay Protection and Automation System Instruction Manual User’s Guide, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, INC, Pullman, WA, USA, 2007.

User’s Manual DIgSILENT PowerFactory Version 14.0, DIgSILENT GmbH, Gomaringen, Germany, 2008.

A.M. Tsimtsios and V.C. Nikolaidis, “Setting zero-sequence compensation factor in distance relays protecting distribution systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1236–1246, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2017.2762465.

M.N. Uddin, N. Rezaei, and M.S. Arifin, “Hybrid machine learning-based intelligent distance protection and control schemes with fault and zonal classification capabilities for grid - Connected wind farms,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 7328–7340, Nov./Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2023.3302836.

H. Junjie et al., “Analysis of the effect of UHV series compensation capacitor on distance protection,” 2018 2nd IEEE Conf. Energy Internet Energy Syst. Integr. (EI2), 2018, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/EI2.2018.8582587.

S. Wu, Z. Liu, and J. Li, “Global sensitivity analysis based on Inception-CNN,” 2020 Chin. Control Decis. Conf. (CCDC), 2020, pp. 3818–3823, doi: 10.1109/CCDC49329.2020.9164657.

P. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Peng, and S. Yang, “An improved screening method based on standard Morris for learning neural network,” 2018 13th World Congr. Intell. Control Automat. (WCICA), 2018, pp. 88–92, doi: 10.1109/WCICA.2018.8630508.

K. Ye et al., “Global sensitivity analysis of large distribution system with PVs using deep Gaussian process,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4888–4891, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3084455.

K. Ye et al., “A data-driven global sensitivity analysis framework for three-phase distribution system with PVs,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4809–4819, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3069009.

N. Rohadi and R. Živanović, “Sensitivity analysis of impedance measurement algorithms implemented in intelligent electronic devices,” 2022 30th Mediterr. Conf. Control Automat. (MED), 2022, pp. 1042–1046, doi: 10.1109/MED54222.2022.9837121.

J. Guo, J. Xiao, S. Liu, and T. Wang, “Research on global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis (SA) algorithms based on the development of energy internet,” 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Energy Internet (ICEI), 2019, pp. 86–91, doi: 10.1109/ICEI.2019.00022.

K. He, X. Xu, H. Wang, and Z. Yan, “Global sensitivity analysis of islanded microgrid power flow,” 2018 IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet. (PESGM), 2018, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/PESGM.2018.8586617.

Published
2024-08-06
How to Cite
Nanang Rohadi, Bambang Mukti Wibawa, & Nendi Suhendi. (2024). GSA With Factor Screening for Performance Evaluation of Transmission Line Protection Relays. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Dan Teknologi Informasi, 13(3), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.22146/jnteti.v13i3.9422