Journal of Social Development Studies https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JSDS <p style="text-align: justify;">Journal of Social Development Studies (JSDS) publishes peer-reviewed articles on all social development issues that are widely scattered both in Indonesia and wide-globe region countries. The journal aims to encourage the knowledge sharing activities between academics, scholars and practitioners in this field. Moreover, the journal is published since 2020 and managed by the Department of Social Development and Welfare, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada twice per year, in January-June and July-December. In 2021 JSDS indexed in Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) and in 2022 got national accreditation SINTA 3. The journal focuses on three main areas of discussions: community empowerment, corporate social responsibility, and social policy. The journal welcomes papers that discuss the following themes: Social Movement and Empowerment; Human Rights, Citizenship and Development; Social Entrepreneurship; Community Development Theories, Approaches and Methods; Community Organization and Participation; Socio-cultural, Environmental and Economic Development; Industrial Relations; Decent Work; Education and Social Policy; Health Insurance and Policy; Social Protection; Wellbeing, Welfare, and Development; Poverty and Social Justice; Social Inclusion; Gender, Family and Development; Digital Technology and Development; Welfare Regime.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p> en-US jsds.fisipol@ugm.ac.id (Dian Fatmawati) saqib.f@mail.ugm.ac.id (Saqib Fardan Ahmada) Fri, 06 Nov 2026 14:32:37 +0700 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Varieties of Local Universalism: Sectoral Adaptation of Social Policy in Decentralized South Kalimantan, Indonesia https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JSDS/article/view/30825 <p style="font-weight: 400;"><em>This</em><em> study aims to explain how universalism in social policy is adapted at the local level in South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, focusing on the circumstances, challenges, and gaps between the ideal of universalism and the realities on the ground. While universalism is increasingly recognized as a key principle supporting equal access, citizenship rights, and social solidarity, its application in fiscally decentralized systems remains underexplored. Using qualitative document analysis of planning documents, regulations, and reports from 13 cities and regencies, the study applies a heuristic analytical framework structured along policy content and policy process, informed by universalism literature, to systematically examine local adaptations across health, education, and social services. The findings reveal that local adaptations lead to different sectoral models: fragmented universalism in health, stratified universalism in education, and categorical universalism in social services, all deviating from the central government’s minimal service standards. These sectoral differences are further exacerbated by territorial fragmentation caused by fiscal decentralization without sufficient equalization mechanisms, which collectively undermine universal coverage. The study concludes that expanding coverage alone is insufficient, as policymakers must strengthen intergovernmental equalization mechanisms and improve sector-specific service quality to bridge the gap between policy goals and actual implementation.</em></p> Mizan Ikhlasul Rahman, Chairul Sa'roni, Muhamad Anshar Nur, Muhamad Saleh Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Social Development Studies https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/JSDS/article/view/30825 Fri, 06 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0700