PCD Journal https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Power, Conflict and Democracy Journal (PCD Journal) is an initiative dedicated to advancing high-quality academic research and reports focused on the dynamics of power, conflict, and democracy in the Global South, with particular emphasis on South and Southeast Asia. The journal prioritizes themes such as rights-based democratic practices, popular representation, and participatory public policy. Recognizing the significant scarcity of scholarly publishers in this region and thematic area—partly attributable to geographic biases in international publishing, PCD Journal aims to address and transform this imbalance. The initiative primarily operates within the social sciences, encompassing subfields including political science, human geography, and political anthropology. We encourage scholars and experts engaged in related topics to contribute their research and insights in a spirit of academic equality. All submissions to PCD Journal undergo a rigorous peer review process conducted by an international panel of academics and specialists.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">PCD Journal was first issued in 2009 by the Department of Politics and Government at Universitas Gadjah Mada (DPP UGM), bearing the registration numbers <a href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2085-0433">ISSN 2085-0433</a> for print and <a href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2085-0441">ISSN 2085-0441</a> for its online edition. Initially, the journal was established as part of the “Power, Conflict, and Democracy” project under the Global South-Global North network, which included Universitas Gadjah Mada (Indonesia), the University of Colombo (Sri Lanka), and the University of Oslo (Norway). This network also comprised Demos Indonesia (the Indonesian Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies), the Social Scientists’ Association of Sri Lanka, and the International Centre for Ethnic Studies in Sri Lanka.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The journal’s administration was originally managed by the Centre for Southeast Asian Social Studies (CESASS) UGM and is currently managed by PolGov (Research Centre for Politics and Government), a research and publication arm within DPP UGM. Over time, the journal has reached several important milestones; notably, in 2018, it was indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and attained a national accreditation rating of SINTA 3. In 2020, the journal updated its website and editorial format, introducing a layout that prioritizes accessibility and readability.</span></p> en-US hhanif@ugm.ac.id (Hasrul Hanif) pcd@ugm.ac.id (Diana Mayasari) Mon, 25 May 2026 09:22:13 +0700 OJS 3.1.2.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Reclaiming Spaces from the Margins https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD/article/view/23243 <p><em>This article explores the social production of participatory spaces, its effect on the participatory mechanisms, and how marginali</em><em>s</em><em>ed groups could reshape these spaces to claim their rights. The issue of housing the poor in Indonesia has rarely been a participatory process and is dominated by state-led evictions and government-controlled public housing. A recent initiative proposed by urban poor social movements, termed </em>kampung susun<em>&nbsp;attempted to shift decision-making and empower the marginali</em><em>s</em><em>ed. Despite early successful attempts, not all have managed to deliver changes smoothly. This article aims to investigate how these spaces of participation could fail to achieve transformative results and what kinds of opportunities exist for reclaiming decisive participation. The study argues that existing power relations and prevailing political culture of the local bureaucracy, state-owned company, and even within the urban poor hinders attempts at delivering the desired outcome for the movement. Nevertheless, avenues of reshaping spaces still exist through electoral institutions and the act of creating their own spaces of engagement.</em></p> Faza Siddiq Copyright (c) 2026 PCD Journal https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD/article/view/23243 Fri, 22 May 2026 09:12:51 +0700 Algorithmic Governmentality and the Construction of Political Truth https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD/article/view/26614 <p><em>The shift in political campaigning style ahead of the 2024 election has been largely driven by technological advancements. Candidates increasingly utilised social media, particularly TikTok, to attract the attention of Gen Z and Millennial voters. This study aims to examine how the TikTok algorithm functioned as a political marketing strategy for the Prabowo</em>–<em>Gibran pair and to analyse the power relations embedded within their digital campaign. Employing a qualitative methodology the research uses content analysis techniques underpinned by Michel Foucault’s perspective on discourse theory. Were gathered through a literature review and observation of TikTok content. While content analysis identifies specific campaign patterns and strategies, the Foucauldian lens reveals the power relations operating within algorithmic mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that the Prabowo</em>–<em>Gibran campaign used the ‘gemoy’ dance, viral jingles, and AI-generated cartoons to engage young voters. Through discourse practices that shape a new </em><em>‘</em><em>regime of truth</em><em>’</em><em>, the ‘reversal to real’ strategy successfully transformed Prabowo’s public persona from a stern military figure into a populist one. Furthermore, the power relations within Jokowi’s political network were widely disseminated via TikTok, with algorithms serving as a ‘technology of power’ that governed voter preferences and contributes to the pair’s victory.</em></p> Athira Zahroh Firdausi Ramadhani Copyright (c) 2026 PCD Journal https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD/article/view/26614 Fri, 22 May 2026 09:14:56 +0700