https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/jinovak/issue/feedJurnal Inovasi Akademik2025-12-30T10:31:39+07:00Ikra Aryantariikra.aryantari@ugm.ac.idOpen Journal Systems<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>JINOVAK</strong> is a platform for disseminating creative ideas and research on the academic transformation carried out by teachers, lecturers, researchers, and practitioners. This journal publishes original research papers, review articles, and case studies on curriculum, learning and teaching methods, assessment and evaluation, educational theory, and policy.</span></p>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/jinovak/article/view/19082Gap Analysis of The Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka Policy in Islamic State Higher Education Institutions a Case Study at UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta2025-12-30T10:31:37+07:00Ali Alatasalialatas6797@gmail.comSahid Susantoalialatas6797@mail.ugm.ac.idZuprizalalialatas6797@mail.ugm.ac.id<p>Higher education as an institution that has a strategic role as a center of academic excellence is expected to be able to provide quality education. Various efforts have been made, one of which is the implementation of the <em>Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka</em> (MBKM) policy. This policy is implemented as a whole, including UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta as an institution under the auspices of the State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN) in this case the Ministry of Religion. The purpose of the study is to measure satisfaction, the level of gap between reality and expectations and institutional readiness. The research method used is a mixed research method (mix methods) with a sequential explanatory design approach. The data collection method was carried out by distributing questionnaires to students and conducting interviews with policy makers. The research respondents consisted of 97 students in 12 faculties, 38 study programs and 3 scientific clumps as well as policy makers. The results showed that service quality at UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta is still unsatisfactory in meeting the needs of students. This is proven by the low average value of service satisfaction which is 2.92 with an average value of gap of -1.42 which is caused by the readiness of the institution in adapting policies and the lack of support provided by the Ministry of Religion regarding the implementation of policies in State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN)</p>2025-12-30T08:57:15+07:00Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Inovasi Akademikhttps://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/jinovak/article/view/26444Evaluasi Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Implementasi SPMI pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Yogyakarta2025-12-30T10:31:37+07:00Saiful Hudasaifulhuda111@gmail.com<p><strong>ABSTRACK</strong></p> <p>The Higher Education Quality Assurance System consists of the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) and the External Quality Assurance System (SPME) or accreditation. Several study programs at a private university in Yogyakarta have received less-than-optimal accreditation results, while accreditation performance greatly depends on the effectiveness of SPMI implementation. This study aims to analyze the supporting and inhibiting factors in the implementation of the SPMI cycle (PPEPP) in study programs that have not yet achieved an excellent accreditation status. The study is limited to the implementation of SPMI referring to the national education standards for academic education. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires and in-depth interviews, and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman approach. The findings indicate that although study programs have implemented SPMI, its implementation remains inconsistent, with several weaknesses identified in the PPEPP process. This study identifies various supporting and inhibiting factors in SPMI implementation, both internal and external in nature. The results are expected to provide input for higher education institutions and study programs in strengthening the implementation of the PPEPP cycle within SPMI, thereby improving study program quality and supporting the accreditation process to achieve more optimal outcomes.</p> <p>Keywords: SPMI, accreditation, supporting factors, inhibiting factors, higher education quality</p> <p><strong> </strong></p> <p><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p> <p>Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi terdiri atas Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) dan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Eksternal (SPME) atau akreditasi. Beberapa program studi di salah satu perguruan tinggi swasta di Yogyakarta mendapat hasil akreditasi yang kurang optimal, sedangkan keberhasilan akreditasi sangat bergantung dengan efektivitas inplementasi SPMI. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor pendukung dan faktor penghambat dalam pelaksanaan siklus SPMI (PPEPP) pada Program Studi yang belum terakreditasi unggul. Penelitian dibatasi pada pada implementasi SPMI mengacu pada standar nasional pendidikan untuk pendidikan akademik. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner terbuka dan wawancara mendalam, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan pendekatan Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun program studi telah melaksanakan SPMI, implementasinya belum konsisten dan terdapat beberapa kelemahan dalam proses PPEPP. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi beragam faktor pendukung dan faktor penghambat implementasi SPMI, baik yang bersifat internal maupun eksternal. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi masukan bagi perguruan tinggi dan program studi dalam memperkuat implementasi siklus PPEPP dalam SPMI, sehingga mutu program studi meningkat dan dapat mendukung proses akreditasi untuk memperoleh hasil yang lebih optimal.</p> <p>Kata kunci: SPMI, akreditasi, faktor pendukung, faktor penghambat, mutu pendidikan tinggi</p>2025-12-30T09:09:31+07:00Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Inovasi Akademikhttps://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/jinovak/article/view/22836Optimizing Suture Training: Evaluating Self-Learning vs. Modified Peyton's with Expert Videos2025-12-30T10:31:38+07:00cyntia asthiny putri sianturicyntiaputri@upnvj.ac.idfeda makkiyahfedaanisah@upnvj.ac.idpritha maya savitriprithamayasavitri@upnvj.ac.idkarina karinakarina@upnvj.ac.id<p>Introduction</p> <p>Effective learning methods are crucial for improving wound suturing efficacy using expert videos. This study compared the effectiveness of self-learning and the Modified Peyton's Approach (MPA) in teaching wound suturing with expert video instruction.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This experimental study enrolled 20 first-year medical students. Following a pre-test, students were randomized into two groups: a control group (n=10) using the self-learning method, and an intervention group (n=10) utilizing the MPA method. All students then completed a post-test mirroring the pre-test. Individual recordings of pre- and post-test sessions were analyzed for skill scores and total time taken. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 24.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both the self-learning and MPA groups showed significant improvement. The control (self-learning) group demonstrated significant improvements in skill scores (p=0.000) and total time taken (p=0.013). Similarly, the intervention (MPA) group showed significant improvements for both variables (p=0.004). While no statistically significant difference was found between the self-learning and MPA methods for either variable (skill scores p=0.089, total time p=0.179), the MPA group consistently demonstrated better results across both skill scores and time taken.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both self-learning and the Modified Peyton's Approach are effective methods for suture learning using expert videos, with no statistically significant difference in overall effectiveness. However, the Modified Peyton's Approach consistently led to a higher performance level in both skill acquisition and procedural efficiency.</p>2025-12-30T09:10:01+07:00Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Inovasi Akademik