CFD Analysis of Indoor Chlorine Gas Dispersion Storage: Temperatures, Wind Velocities and Ventilation Effects Studies

https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.49669

M. Safakar(1), S. Syafiie(2*), R. Yunus(3)

(1) Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
(2) Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia; Department of Chemical Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, Aceh, Indonesia
(3) Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia; Institute of Advance Technology (ITMA), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Chemical products factories encounter inherent environmental risks in the process. The indoor release of hazardous chemical gases that are heavier than the air is nowadays a special subject for scrutiny because the dense clouds of the gas have a tendency to insist on the ground level or near the human breath level, causing fatal injuries or other potential health threats to human beings. In this study, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT was employed in order to model the accidental indoor dispersion of a dense gas (chlorine) from a small undetected leak in an indoor industrial environment. Furthermore, the effects of different temperatures, wind velocities and ventilation on diffusion of chlorine are investigated in this paper. Results of the simulations represented that the chlorine gas dispersion would behave like the liquid and currents on the floor. It was also found that the chlorine concentration above the ground level increased slowly. Showing the effects of various temperatures and wind on spreading the dense gas will help to better identify the potential risks. In this research, the effects of the environmental situations with the release and spread of chlorine in the indoor space were meticulously investigated.

Keywords


CFD, Indoor Environment, Dense gas Dispersion, Various Temperatures and Wind Velocities, ventilation

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Anonymous, Chlorine Safe Work Practices. Compensation, Workers Columbia, British, 2006, pp. 1–44.
  2. C. Winder, “The toxicology of chlorine.,” Environ. Res., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 105–14, Feb. 2001.
  3. J. García, E. Migoya, J. a Lana, and a Crespo, “Study of the dispersion of natural gas issuing from compressor stations through silencers with upper cover.,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1060–72, Apr. 2008.
  4. M. Kiša and Ľ. Jelemenský, “CFD dispersion modelling for emergency preparadnes,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 97–104, Jan. 2009.
  5. M. Pontiggia, G. Landucci, V. Busini, M. Derudi, M. Alba, M. Scaioni, S. Bonvicini, V. Cozzani, and R. Rota, “CFD model simulation of LPG dispersion in urban areas,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 45, no. 24, pp. 3913–3923, Aug. 2011.
  6. M. Siddiqui, S. Jayanti, and T. Swaminathan, “CFD analysis of dense gas dispersion in indoor environment for risk assessment and risk mitigation.,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 209– 210, pp. 177–85, Mar. 2012.
  7. P. Gilham, S., Deaves, D. M., & Woodburn, “Mitigation of dense gas releases within buildings: validation of CFD modelling.,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 71, no. 1–3, pp. 193–218, Jan. 2000.
  8. P. Schmittinger, Chlorine–Principles and Industrial Practice. Weinheim, Germany, 2000, pp. 159–222.
  9. R. Pontiggia, M., Derudi, M., Busini, V., & Rota, “Hazardous gas dispersion: a CFD model accounting for atmospheric stability classes.,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 171, no. 1–3, pp. 739–47, Nov. 2009.
  10. S. Cheng, G. Chen, Q. Chen, and X. Xiao, “Research on 3D dynamic visualization simulation system of toxic gas diffusion based on virtual reality technology,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 175–183, May 2009.
  11. S. Gilham, D. Deaves, and R. Hoxey, “Gas build-up within a single building volume—comparison of measurements with both CFD and simple zone modelling,” J. Hazard, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 93–114, 1997.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.49669

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 53 | views : 72

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.