Strategi Pemanfaatan Insentif Pajak atas Kebijakan Stimulus dan Subsidi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di Kabupaten Sleman
Gama Pamungkas(1*), Fitri Amalia(2), Slamet Sugiri(3)
(1) Master in Accounting, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) memegang peranan strategis dalam perekonomian Indonesia, namun pemanfaatan insentif pajak yang disediakan pemerintah masih tergolong rendah. Fenomena ini mengindikasikan adanya kesenjangan antara kebijakan yang dirancang dan realitas di lapangan, yang perlu diidentifikasi secara sistematis. Meskipun UMKM menunjukkan pertumbuhan yang signifikan, terdapat suatu dinamika yang menarik: pertumbuhan ini tidak serta merta berkorelasi dengan peningkatan kepatuhan pajak atau pemanfaatan insentif, menunjukkan adanya tantangan mendasar dalam integrasi sektor yang berkembang pesat ini ke dalam sistem perpajakan formal. Selain itu, tantangan yang dihadapi UMKM melampaui sekadar kurangnya informasi; terdapat pula keterbatasan kapasitas dan persepsi negatif terhadap sistem perpajakan yang memerlukan perhatian lebih.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami strategi pemanfaatan insentif pajak oleh UMKM di Kabupaten Sleman, mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya, serta merekomendasikan solusi untuk mengatasi hambatan yang ada. Pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus digunakan, melibatkan wawancara mendalam dengan 16 pelaku UMKM di Kabupaten Sleman, didukung oleh studi dokumentasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemanfaatan insentif bervariasi dari pasif hingga aktif, dipengaruhi oleh status legalitas, pemahaman pajak, dan akses dukungan. Faktor-faktor penentu mencakup aspek internal seperti pengetahuan, motivasi, dan manajemen usaha, serta aspek eksternal seperti akses pelatihan, peran pemerintah, pengaruh sosial, dan hambatan teknis. Solusi yang direkomendasikan melibatkan pelatihan praktis yang intensif, peningkatan peran pemerintah, penyederhanaan sistem digital, dan kebijakan yang kontekstual. Temuan ini memperkuat aplikasi Teori Perilaku Terencana (TPB) dalam konteks kepatuhan pajak UMKM, khususnya dalam menjelaskan bagaimana sikap, norma subjektif, dan persepsi kontrol perilaku memengaruhi niat dan tindakan pelaku usaha. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa insentif pajak dapat berfungsi sebagai katalisator untuk perbaikan praktik akuntansi mikro dan tata kelola keuangan UMKM secara keseluruhan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjei, E., Sarpong, D., & Winful, E. (2023). Tax fairness and SME tax compliance in emerging economies. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 15(2), 45–59.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Alm, J., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2017). The challenges of tax reform in a global economy. Public Finance Review, 45(1), 3–18.
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage Publications.
Aduol, F., & Mwangi, M. (2018). Tax planning and financial performance of SMEs in Nairobi County, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(1), 95–106.
Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2014).
Redistribution via taxation: The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries. UCLA Law Review, 52(6), 1627–1695.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
De Gruyter. (2023). The role and limitations of tax incentives for SMEs. De Gruyter Open Economics, 10(1), 102–115.
Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM Kabupaten Sleman. (2023). Data dan Statistik UMKM Kabupaten Sleman tahun 2023. Sleman: Dinas Koperasi & UMKM.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2020). Transformasi perpajakan berbasis digital di Indonesia. Jakarta: DJP.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Halimatussadiah, A., & Sadono, D. (2018). Tax incentives and the performance of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(2), 267–288.
Hermanto, B., Nurkhin, A., & Anis, I. (2022). Tax incentives and tax compliance: Evidence from Indonesian SMEs. Accounting, 8(5), 1103–1110.
ID Publications. (2023). The effectiveness of tax incentives for SMEs: An Indonesian perspective. ID Publications Journal, 5(3), 40–51https://idpublications.org/2023/03/15/t he-effectiveness-of-tax-incentives-for- smes/.
IEEE Xplore. (2023). Factors influencing successful tax incentive utilization among SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(1), 124–134.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2020). Fiscal policies to support people during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMF Policy Paper.
International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBA). (2023). Tax policy impacts on SME performance: A developing country perspective. IJEBA, 7(2), 45–61.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐ structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954– 2965.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023). Peraturan
Menteri Keuangan tentang Insentif Pajak untuk UMKM. Jakarta: Kemenkeu RI.
Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2020, 2023). Data Statistik UMKM Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemenkop UKM.
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Tahunan KUR Nasional. Jakarta: Kemenko Perekonomian.
Lee, C., & Lim, S. (2021). Social norms and tax compliance: Evidence from SMEs. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1467–1481.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Magasha, I., Gillo, R., & Alex, B. (2025). The role of tax incentives and audit frequency on SME tax compliance in Tanzania. Journal of African Business, 26(2), 134–150.
Mas'ud, A., Manaf, N. A., & Saad, R. A. J. (2020). Do trust and enforcement moderate the relationship between tax compliance and tax incentives among SMEs? Journal of Financial Crime, 27(3), 884–901.
Musfialdy, Wulandari, E., & Mayasari, D. (2022). Tax planning and compliance behavior: The role of tax knowledge and taxpayer awareness. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(3), 563-574.
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12- i3/12601.
Nguyen, N., Pham, H., & Dang, X. (2019). Factors affecting tax compliance behavior of SMEs in Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9(3), 921–930.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.12. 015.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International
Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
Ntiamoah, E. B., Sarpong, D., & Winful, E.
C. (2019). Determinants of tax compliance among SMEs in Ghana: evidence from a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 9(3), 1–13.
Nyondo, C. (2023). Tax compliance and literacy among SMEs in Malawi. African Journal of Business Management, 17(2), 55–65.
OECD. (2019). Tax challenges arising from digitalisation – Interim report 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2020: An OECD Scoreboard. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). One year of SME and entrepreneurship policy responses to COVID 19: Lessons learned to “build back better”. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2022). SME and entrepreneurship outlook 2022. Paris: OECD Publishing. Poland, B. D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290–310.
Pratama, A., & Suryadi, S. (2021). The impact of tax incentives policy for SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(1), 109–125.
Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Setiawan, A., & Nugroho, Y. (2022). Determinants of tax compliance for SMEs: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(2), 198–210.
SME United. (2023). Taxation policies for European SMEs: Position Paper. Brussels: SME United.
Smith, M. J., & Smythe, J. (2020). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: Pillars for post-crisis economic recovery. Asian Economic Policy Review, 15(1), 110–124.
SSRN. (2023). The impact of tax incentives on small and medium enterprises: An international review. SSRN Working Paper Series.
Tan, L. M., & Fatt, C. K. (2018). Tax
compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 205–234.
Thompson, M., McGill, M., & De Foe, J. (2020). Behavioral control and tax compliance among SMEs. Small Enterprise Research, 27(3), 300–314.
Veronica, L., Putra, R. A., & Handayani, S. R. (2023). Financial literacy and training
or SMEs in Indonesia:
mplications for performance. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 17(1), 109–126.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2302 - 1500

.png)
_logo2.png)





