Differences in Satisfaction Level between Subsidised JKN Patients and Non-Subsidised JKN Patients: A Case Study in a Hospital in Bantul with Quantitative Analysis Approach

Yanasta Yudo Pratama; Muhammad Syamsu Hidayat; Tri Ani Marwati; Lina Handayani

doi:10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744

Differences in Satisfaction Level between Subsidised JKN Patients and Non-Subsidised JKN Patients: A Case Study in a Hospital in Bantul with Quantitative Analysis Approach

https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744

Yanasta Yudo Pratama^(1*), Muhammad Syamsu Hidayat⁽²⁾, Tri Ani Marwati⁽³⁾, Lina Handayani⁽⁴⁾

(1) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The National Health Insurance (JKN) organized by BPJS is a guarantee in the form of health protection so that participants get the benefits of health checks and protection in meeting basic health needs given to everyone. Measuring the level of patient satisfaction is needed to determine the level of service provided by a service provider. To identify differences in the satisfaction of JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non PBI patients who received health services at the place research.

Materials and Methods: This study used an analytical observational research design with a cross sectional method through a Quantitative Method approach. Data obtained by using questionnaires and interviews with respondents. The level of patient satisfaction was analyzed using GAP scores, CSI, and Independent Samples T Test.

Results: The results of the GAP score indicate that JKN class 3 PBI patients have the lowest GAP score on the reliability dimension, which is -0.1733 and the highest GAP score on the assurance dimension with a score of -0.0875. Meanwhile, JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had the lowest score on the tangibles dimension with -0.1955 and the highest on the reliability dimension with -0.1711. JKN class 3 PBI patients had a CSI score of 69.81% and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients had 66.938%. If statistically tested, there is a significant difference between JKN class 3 PBI patients and JKN class 3 non-PBI patients with p value < 0.05.

Conclusion: From the results of the analysis, at the placed research patients are generally satisfied with the services provided. JKN class 3 PBI patients feel more satisfied than JKN class 3 non PBI patients.

Keywords

Satisfaction; SERVQUAL; Health Service

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Rif’atul H. Hak Atas Derajat Pelayanan Kesehatan Yang Optimal. Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran. 2016 Dec;16(2):128–33.

2. Budianti S. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Peningkatan Derajat Kesehatan Keluarga Melalui Posdaya di Kota Bekasi. journal/ks [Internet]. 2014;1(2):87–100. Available from: http://www.universitas-trilogi.ac.id/

3. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://infeksiemerging.kemkes.go.id/download/UU_36_2009_Kesehatan.pdf

4. Misnaniarti, Hidayat B, Nadjib M, Thabrany H, Junadi P, Purwoko B, et al. Ketersediaan Fasilitas dan Tenaga Kesehatan Dalam Mendukung Cakupan Semesta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 1];1(1):6–16. Available from: https://ejournal2.litbang.kemkes.go.id/index.php/jpppk/article/download/425/142

5. Manorek L, Tucunan AAT, Ratag BT. Hubungan Antara Persepsi Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Dengan Kepuasan Pasien Peserta BPJS di Puskesmas Pingkan Tenga Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal KESMAS. 2020;9(2):1–6.

6. Bustami. Penjaminan Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan dan Akseptabilitas. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2011.

7. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: https://bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/dmdocuments/20e67493084e6d2e600888b1dd9f94f4.pdf

8. Kementerian Kesehatan. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 [Internet]. 28 tahun 2014 2014. Available from: https://www.kemhan.go.id/itjen/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bn874-2014.pdf

9. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014. 2014.

10. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2004. 2004.

11. Badan Pusat Statistik. Jumlah Penduduk Indonesia 2020 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/news/2021/01/21/405/bps--270-20-juta-penduduk-indonesia-hasil-sp2020.html

12. Detik News. JKN Capai 226,3 Juta Peserta [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 3]. Available from: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5737498/jkn-kis-capai-2263-juta-peserta-bpjs-kesehatan-bagi-tips-ke-india#:~:text=Direktur%20Utama%20BPJS%20Kesehatan%2C%20Ali,dari%20total%20jumlah%20penduduk%20Indonesia.

13. Ombudsman Jogja. Ombudsman Dorong Pemprov DIY Optimalkan Sosialisasi JKN [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://ombudsman.jogjaprov.go.id/ombudsman-dorong-pemprov-diy-optimalkan-sosialisasi-jkn/

14. Arip S, Dyah M. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Journal of Governance And Public Policy. 2017;4(1):71–107.

15. Abdurahman, Junaidi, Aminuyati. Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Kesehatan (Pada Pasien Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 2];6(2). Available from: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/18439/15563

16. Shandy WP. Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Kualitas Produk Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan dan Loyalitas Konsumen. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran. 2014;2(1):1–9.

17. Abdul S. Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Bangka Tengah. Jurnal Bestari. 2021;1(2):38–52.

18. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Manajemen Mutu Informasi Kesehatan I: Quality Assurance. 2017th ed. Iman AT, Lena D, editors. Jakarta: BPPSDMK; 2017.

19. Anggasta G, Nurcahyanto H, Sulandari S. Analisis Dimensi Kualitas Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Batang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review. 2014;3(1).

20. Baskoro RR, Arvianto A, Rinawati DI. Penilaian Kepuasan Pasien Dengan Menggunakan Metode SERVQUAL Guna Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan di RSUD Ungaran. Industrial Engineering Online Journal. 2016;5(4).

21. Annisa N. Hubungan Mutu Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Kelas III di Rumah Sakit TK.IV Madiun Tahun 2017. [Madiun]; 2017.

22. Pangestu AY. Gambaran Kepuasan Pasien Pada Pelayanan Rawat Jalan di RSU Kota Tangerang Selatan Tahun 2013. [Jakarta]; 2013.

23. Santoso S. Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Rawat Inap Kelas III pada RS. Roemani Muhammadiyah Semarang. [Semarang]; 2012.

24. Radhitiyo D, Rukmi HS, Novirani D. Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Pada Rumah Sakit Ibu Dan Anak Mitra Family Dengan Pendekatan Service Quality (SERVQUAL). Jurnal Online Institut Teknologi Nasional. 2015 Oct;3(4).

25. Anisah FA. Analisis Pengukuran Tingkat Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Dengan Metode Service Quality (SERVQUAL) [Internet]. [Yogyakarta]; 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 4]. Available from: http://bppsdmk.kemkes.go.id/pusdiksdmk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/MMIK-I_FINAL_SC_26_12_2017.pdf

26. Yenni C. Perbandingan Harapan dan Kenyataan Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Untuk Menggambarkan Kepuasan Konsumen Dengan Resep Obat di Apotek Kimia Farma Area Manajer Bisnis Yogyakarta Periode Desember 2009-Januari 2010. 2010.

27. Yeni I, Budi SC. Kepuasan Pasien TNI Terhadap Pelayanan Pendaftaran Rawat Jalan Dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) di RSPAU Dr. S. Hardjolukito. Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional. 2017 Aug 17;1(2):53.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ahj.v4i1.71744