Peran sumber layanan dan jenis provider terhadap diskontinuitas kontrasepsi: analisis data survei demografi kesehatan Indonesia 2012

https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.9357

Izzatul Arifah(1*), Sukamdi Sukamdi(2), Siswanto Agus Wilopo(3)

(1) Departemen Biostatistik, Epidemiologi dan Kesehatan Populasi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Departemen Biostatistik, Epidemiologi dan Kesehatan Populasi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Effects of health facility ownership and type of providers on contraception discontinuation: an analysis of 2012 Indonesian demographic health survey

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the role of source of family planning services and types of providers on the discontinuity pattern of modern contraceptive use in women of childbearing age.

Methods

This study analyzed the longitudinal data using secondary data of the IDHS 2012. The sample criteria were: women ever married, aged 15-49, who have ever used modern contraception (pills, injections, IUDs and implants). Stratified Cox models were used to assess the effect of predictors toward contraceptive discontinuation.

Results

Kaplan-Meier curves showed higher discontinuity in the short-term contraceptive methods such as injections and pills. Multivariable analysis showed the influence of method source to discontinuation after controlling for other factors, namely age, number of children, education level and place of residence. The risk of discontinuation was greater in government source than private, with HR 1.14 95% CI (1.06 to 1.23). Sub-sample analysis of private services showed a greater chance of discontinuity in physician, with HR 1.28 95% CI (1.06 to 1.54).

Conclusion

Contraceptive discontinuation rate was lower among women using private source and midwives. Women with older age had greater number of children, and the factor of low education levels also was associated with longer duration of contraceptive use.


Keywords


source of method; provider; discontinuation; modern contraceptive



References

  1. Cleland J, Ali MM. Reproductive consequences of contraceptive failure in 19 developing countries. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;104(2):314-20.
  2. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiologic reviews. 2010;32(1) :152-74.
  3. Blanc AK, Curtis SL, Croft TN. Monitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of care. Studies in family planning. 2002;33(2):127-40.
  4. Ali M, Cleland J. Determinants of contraceptive discontinuation in six developing countries. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1999;31(03):343-60.
  5. Gubhaju B. Barriers to sustained use of contraception in Nepal: quality of care, socio- economic status, and method-related factors. Biodemography and social biology. 2009;55(1):52-70.
  6. RamaRao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, Pangolibay B, Jones H. The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2003:76-83.
  7. Heywood P, Harahap NP. Health facilities at the district level in Indonesia. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):13.
  8. BPS, BKKBN, Kemenkes RI, ICF International. Survey Demografi Kesehatan Indonesia 2012. Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2013.
  9. Steele F. Selection effects of source of contraceptive supply in an analysis of discontinuation of contraception: multilevel modelling when random effects are correlated with an explanatory variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2003;166(3):407-23.
  10. Koenig MA, Ahmed S, Hossain MB. The impact of quality of care on contraceptive use: evidence from longitudinal data from rural Bangladesh: Frontiers in Reproductive Health, Population Council; 2003.
  11. Staveteig S, Mallick L, Winter R. Uptake and discontinuation of long-acting reversible contra- ceptives (LARCs) in low-income countries. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International, 2015.
  12. Becker D, Koenig MA, Mi Kim Y, Cardona K, Sonenstein FL. The quality of family planning services in the United States: findings from a literature review. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2007;39(4):206-15.
  13. Agha S, Do M. The quality of family planning services and client satisfaction in the public and private sectors in Kenya. International journal for quality in health care. 2009;21(2):87-96.
  14. Hutchinson PL, Do M, Agha S. Measuring client satisfaction and the quality of family planning services: a comparative analysis of public and private health facilities in Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana. BMC health services research. 2011; 11(1):203.
  15. Nilakusmawati DPE, Nitiyasa G. Studi operasional peningkatan pemakaian kontrasepsi IUD di Provinsi Bali PIRAMIDA. 2012;8(2).
  16. Frost JJ, Gold RB, Frohwirth L, Blades N. Variation in service delivery practices among clinics providing publicly funded family planning services in 2010. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.
  17. Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordoñez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxy progesterone acetate. Contraception. 2001;63(3): 143-6.
  18. El-shereef EA, Gamal H, Ahmed M. Contraceptive use dynamics and effect of counseling on use-continuation of contraception in Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt. Journal of American Science. 2011;7(6).
  19. Agwanda A, Khasakhala A, Kimani M. Assessment of family planning services in Kenya: Evidence from the 2004 Kenya Service Provision Assessment survey. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International, 2009.
  20. Schoemaker J. Contraceptive use among the poor in Indonesia. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2005:106-14.
  21. Laguna EP, Po ALC, Perez A, Kanter A. Contraceptive Use Dynamics in the Philippines: Determinants of Contraceptive Method Choice and Discontinuation: Macro International; 2000.
  22. Withers MH, Tavrow P, Adinata NA. Do Ambivalent Women Have an Unmet Need for Family Planning? A Longitudinal Study from Bali, Indonesia. Women's Health Issues. 2011;21(6):444-9.
  23. Curtis S, Evens E, Sambisa W. Contraceptive discontinuation and unintended pregnancy: an imperfect relationship. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2011;37(2):58.
  24. Belfield T. Principles of contraceptive care: choice, acceptability and access. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;23(2): 177-85.
  25. Ali MM, Cleland J. Contraceptive Switching after Method‐related Discontinuation: Levels and Differentials. Studies in family planning. 2010;41(2):129-33.
  26. Bradley SE, Schwandt H, Khan S. Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS analytical studies. 2009;20.
  27. Bradley SEK, William Winfrey, Trevor N. Croft. Contraceptive Use and Perinatal Mortality in the DHS: An Assessment of the Quality and Consistency of Calendars and Histories. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF International; 2015.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bkm.9357

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 931 | views : 1662

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2016 Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat



Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat ISSN 0215-1936 (PRINT), ISSN: 2614-8412 (ONLINE).

Indexed by:

 

Web Analytics Visitor Counter