Measuring the Role of Observable Variables of Student Engagement on College Belongingness Using the MIMIC Model

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.94921

Sayang Ajeng Mardhiyah(1), Rachmawati Rachmawati(2*), Gökmen Arslan(3), Rosada Dwi Iswari(4)

(1) Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya
(2) Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya
(3) Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur
(4) Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sriwijaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Online learning due to social restrictions that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced student engagement in both academic and non-academic fields, which was followed by a decline in college belongingness. However, student engagement takes various forms. Therefore, this research aimed to look at the role of student engagement in the form of attendance or visits, time spent on campus (duration), and involvement in organizations or activities on campus (covariate variables) on college belongingness (latent variable). The research participants were 400 students from a state university in South Sumatra who were selected using the following inclusion criteria: undergraduates, actively enrolled on campus, being at least a freshman (semester 1), at least 18 years old, and studying at the main campus of the university. Participants were selected using a non-probability sampling technique, namely convenience sampling. Data analysis was done using structural modeling, which was the MIMIC model. The results showed that the frequency of attendance and involvement in organizations or activities has a significant role in the social acceptance dimension of college belongingness, but not the amount of time spent on campus. Apart from that, the three covariate variables have no role in the social exclusion dimension of college belongingness.

Keywords


college belongingness; student involvement: MIMIC model

Full Text:

PDF


References

Ahn, M. Y., & Davis, H. H. (2020). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902

Allen, K. A. (2021). The psychology of belonging (1st ed.). Routledge.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). IBM SPSS Amos 23 user’s guide. IBM.

Arlianto, A., & Geshica, L. (2022). Perceived risk of using online transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A MIMIC-model approach. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 20(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.7454/jps.2022.14

Arslan, G. (2021). Loneliness, college belongingness, subjective vitality, and psychological adjustment during coronavirus pandemic: Development of the college belongingness questionnaire. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.240

Arslan, G., & Duru, E. (2017). Initial development and validation of the school belongingness scale. Child Indicators Research, 10(4), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9414-y

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Brown, G. T. L., Alqassab, M., Bulut, O., & Xiao, J. (2020). Detecting differential item functioning of polytomous items in small samples: Comparison of MIMIC with a pure anchor and MIMIC-interaction methods. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 65(4), 415–525.

Burton, D. R. (2018). University belonging and well-being across contexts (Honors thesis No. 234). University of Mississippi. Diunduh dari https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/234

Center for the Study of Student Life. (2022). Involvement and belonging: A research report from the 2022 student life survey (Issue March). Diunduh dari https://cssl.osu.edu/documents/sls22-belonging-and-involvement-report-tagged.pdf

Chaudhuri, K., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Sundaram, L. (2016). Estimation of firm performance from a MIMIC model. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.005

Cheng, Y., Shao, C., & Lathrop, Q. N. (2016). The mediated MIMIC model for understanding the underlying mechanism of DIF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415576187

Cheung, H. N., Ho, W. S., Habibi Asgarabad, M., Chan, S. W. Y., & Williams, J. (2023). A multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model of the self-compassion scale youth (SCS-Y) and investigation of differential item functioning in China, Hong Kong and UK adolescents. Mindfulness, 14(8), 1967–1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02170-z

Chun, S., Stark, S., Kim, E. S., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2016). MIMIC methods for detecting DIF among multiple groups: Exploring a new sequential-free baseline procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(7), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616659738

De Bruijn, A. G. M., & Van Der Wilt, F. (2023). Social acceptance in physical education and the regular classroom: Perceived motor competency and frequency and type of sports participation. Children, 10(3), Article 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030568

De Sisto, M., Huq, A., & Dickinson, G. (2022). Sense of belonging in second-year undergraduate students: The value of extracurricular activities. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(5), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1902951

Drolet, M., & Arcand, I. (2013). Positive development, sense of belonging, and support of peers among early adolescents: Perspectives of different actors. International Education Studies, 6(4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p29

Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552

Gillen-O’Neel, C. (2019). Sense of belonging and student engagement: A daily study of first- and continuing-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 62(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09570-y

Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., & Salomone, K. (2002). Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(3), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.2190/DRYC-CXQ9-JQ8V-HT4V

Hsu, H.-Y., Zhang, D., Kwok, O. M., Li, Y., & Ju, S. (2010). Distinguishing the influences of father’s and mother’s involvement on adolescent academic achievement: Analyses of Taiwan education panel survey data. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(5), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610373101



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.94921

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1400 | views : 660

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Recent Issues:

Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 
Vol 11 Issue 1 (2025)
Page 1-69		 Vol 10 Issue 2 (2024)
Page 79-161		 Vol 10 Issue 1 (2024)
Page 1-78		 Vol 9 Issue 2 (2023)
Page 163-292		 

Address:

Building D 6th Floor (606), Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55781

Contact:

Whatsapp: +6281125210175
Email: gamajop.psikologi@ugm.ac.id

Creative Commons License