Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation of yeast using a vir binary vector system

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijbiotech.100929

Kiao Huio Yap(1), Shu Ting Chang(2), Wai Keat Toh(3), Pek Chin Loh(4), Boon Hoe Lim(5), Khomaizon Abdul Kadir Pahirulzaman(6), Chai-Ling Ho(7), Hann Ling Wong(8*)

(1) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(2) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(3) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(4) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(5) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(6) Faculty of Agro Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 17600 Jeli, Kelantan Darul Naim, Malaysia
(7) Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
(8) Faculty of Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation (AMT) is a widely used genetic engineering tool for generating transgenic plants for crop improvement and functional genomics. Beyond plants, AMT has been successfully applied to non‐plant organisms, further expanding its utility. Given their broad applications, enhancing AMT systems to improve their usability, simplicity, and efficiency is highly desirable. In this study, we developed a novel AMT system, the vir binary vector system, comprising the following core components: the binary vector pG103‐GDE‐1 and the miniaturized helper tumor‐inducing (Ti) plasmid pRIDE101, together with the auxiliary replication helper plasmid pSoup. Yeast was used as a model organism to evaluate its functionality in stable transformation, with the neomycin phosphotransferase II (NptII) gene serving as a selectable marker. The system’s functionality was assessed by comparing its transformation frequency to that of the widely used pGWB1 binary vector system. The results demonstrate that the vir binary vector system achieved a trans‐ formation frequency of 0.76 × 10‐6, approximately 75 percent of that of pGWB1 (1.01 × 10‐6). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses confirmed the presence of the transgene in yeast transformants. These findings validate the functionality of the vir binary vector system and highlight the need for further optimization to enhance its efficiency for broader app


Keywords


Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation; Binary vector; Genetic transformation efficiency; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Selectable marker NptII



References

Anand A, Bass SH, Wu E, Wang N, McBride KE, Annaluru N, Miller M, Hua M, Jones TJ. 2018. An improved ternary vector system for Agrobacterium-mediated rapid maize transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 97(1­2):187–200. doi:10.1007/s11103­018­0732­y.

Arshad H, Patel Z, Mehrabian M, Bourkas ME, AlAzzawi ZA, Schmitt­Ulms G, Watts JC. 2021. The aminoglycoside G418 hinders de novo prion infection in cultured cells. J. Biol. Chem. 297(3):101073. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101073.

Barton KA, Binns AN, Matzke AJ, Chilton MD. 1983. Regeneration of intact tobacco plants containing full length copies of genetically engineered T­DNA, and transmission of T­DNA to R1 progeny. Cell 32(4):1033–1043. doi:10.1016/0092­ 8674(83)90288­X.

Basso MF, Arraes FBM, Grossi­de Sa M, Moreira VJV, Alves­Ferreira M, Grossi­de Sa MF. 2020. Insights Into Genetic and Molecular Elements for Transgenic Crop Development. Front. Plant Sci. 11:509. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00509.

Bundock P, Den Dulk­Ras A, Beijersbergen A, Hooykaas PJ. 1995. Trans­kingdom T­DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 14(13):3206–3214. doi:10.1002/j.1460­2075.1995.tb07323.x.

Chang ST, Toh WK, Yap KH, Teo YL, Namasivayam P, Ho CL, Kashiani P, Loh PC, Wong HL. 2025. A vir binary vector system for Agrobacteriummediated transient transformation in Nicotiana benthamiana. Malays. J. Microbiol. 21(2):171–181. doi:10.21161/mjm.240632.

Chen J, Wang L, Chen J, Huang J, Liu F, Guo R, Yang L, Grabon A, Zhao K, Kong F, Liu C, Tian M. 2018. Agrobacterium tumefaciens­mediated transformation system for the important medicinal plant Dendrobium catenatum Lindl. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. ­ Plant 54(3):228–239. doi:10.1007/s11627­018­9903­4.

Chen L, Xiao W, Yao M, Wang Y, Yuan Y. 2023. Compartmentalization engineering of yeasts to overcome precursor limitations and cytotoxicity in terpenoid production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1132244. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1132244.

Chu UC, Adelberg J, Lowe K, Jones TJ. 2019. Use of DoE methodology to optimize the regeneration of highquality, single­copy transgenic Zea mays L. (maize) plants. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. ­ Plant 55(6):678–694. doi:10.1007/s11627­019­10002­w.

Chuah JA, Yoshizumi T, Kodama Y, Numata K. 2015. Gene introduction into the mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana via peptide­based carriers. Sci. Rep. 5:7751. doi:10.1038/srep07751.

Das A, Shukla A, Thakur S, Rathore M, Singh NP. 2020. Estimation of neomycin phosphotransferase­II (NPT­II) protein in vegetative and reproductive tissues of transgenic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and biosafety perspectives. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 29(3):568–570. doi:10.1007/s13562­020­00562­z.

De Saeger J, Park J, Chung HS, Hernalsteens JP, Van Lijsebettens M, Inzé D, Van Montagu M, Depuydt S. 2021. Agrobacterium strains and strain improvement: Present and outlook. Biotechnol. Adv. 53:107677. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107677.

D’spain S, Andrade PI, Brockman NE, Fu J, Wickes BL. 2022. Agrobacterium tumefaciens­Mediated Transformation of Candida glabrata. J. Fungi 8(6):596. doi:10.3390/jof8060596. D

uran L, López JM, Avalos JL. 2020. Viva la mitochondria!: Harnessing yeast mitochondria for chemical production. FEMS Yeast Res. 20(6):37. doi:10.1093/femsyr/foaa037.

Edwards B, Hornstein ED, Wilson NJ, Sederoff H. 2022. High­throughput detection of T­DNA insertion sites for multiple transgenes in complex genomes. BMC Genomics 23(1):685. doi:10.1186/s12864­022­ 08918­6.

Fu J, Brockman NE, Wickes BL. 2021. Optimizing transformation frequency of cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Fungi 7(7):520. doi:10.3390/jof7070520.

Gaizer T, Juhász J, Pillér B, Szakadáti H, Pongor CI, Csikász­Nagy A. 2024. Integrative analysis of yeast colony growth. Commun. Biol. 7(5):511. doi:10.1038/s42003­024­06218­1.

Gokul G, Singh J. 2022. Dithiothreitol causes toxicity in C. elegans by modulating the methionine­homocysteine cycle. Elife 11:e76021. doi:10.7554/eLife.76021.

Guo M, Ye J, Gao D, Xu N, Yang J. 2019. Agrobacterium­mediated horizontal gene transfer: Mechanism, biotechnological application, potential risk and forestalling strategy. Biotechnol. Adv. 37(1):259– 270. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.12.008.

Gutiérrez­González M, Farías C, Tello S, PérezEtcheverry D, Romero A, Zúñiga R, Ribeiro CH, Lorenzo­Ferreiro C, Molina MC. 2019. Optimization of culture conditions for the expression of three different insoluble proteins in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 9(1):16850. doi:10.1038/s41598­019­53200­7.

Hada A, Krishnan V, Mohamed Jaabir MS, Kumari A, Jolly M, Praveen S, Sachdev A. 2018. Improved Agrobacterium tumefaciens­mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] following optimization of culture conditions and mechanical techniques. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. ­ Plant 54(6):672–688. doi:10.1007/s11627­018­9944­8.

Hadfield C, Jordan BE, Mount RC, Pretorius GH, Burak E. 1990. G418­resistance as a dominant marker and reporter for gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 18(4):303–313. doi:10.1007/BF00318211.

Hellens RP, Anne Edwards E, Leyland NR, Bean S, Mullineaux PM. 2000. pGreen: A versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-­mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 42(6):819–832. doi:10.1023/A:1006496308160.

Hernalsteens JP, Vliet FV, Beuckeleer MD, Depicker A, Engler G, Lemmers M, Holsters M, Montagu MV, Schell J. 1980. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid as a host vector system for introducing foreign DNA in plant cells. Nature 287(5783):654–656. doi:10.1038/287654a0.

Ho MS, Toh WK, Chang ST, Yap KH, Loh PC, Namasivayam P, Wong HL. 2024. Development of selectable markers for mitochondrial transformation in yeast. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 32(3):191– 205. doi:10.35118/apjmbb.2024.032.3.17.

Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA. 1983. A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir­ and T­region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti­plasmid. Nature 30:179–180. doi:10.1038/303179a0.

Hooykaas PJ, den Dulk­Ras A, Bundock P, Soltani J, van Attikum H, van Heusden GPH. 2006. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Methods Mol. Biol. 344:465– 473. doi:10.1385/1­59745­131­2:465.

Hooykaas PJ, van Heusden GPH, Niu X, Reza Roushan M, Soltani J, Zhang X, van der Zaal BJ. 2018. Agrobacterium­mediated transformation of yeast and fungi, volume 418. New York: Springer. p. 349–374. doi:10.1007/82_2018_90.

Hwang HH, Yu M, Lai EM. 2017. AgrobacteriumMediated Plant Transformation: Biology and Applications. Arab. Book. 15:e0186. doi:10.1199/tab.0186.

Jeong J, Jeon EY, Hwang MK, Song YJ, Kim JY. 2024. Development of super­infective ternary vector systems for enhancing the Agrobacterium-­mediated plant transformation and genome editing efficiency. Hortic. Res. 11(9):187. doi:10.1093/hr/uhae187.

Kámán­Tóth E, Pogány M, Dankó T, Szatmári Á, Bozsó Z. 2018. A simplified and efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens electroporation method. 3 Biotech 8(3):148. doi:10.1007/s13205­018­1171­9.

Kang M, Lee K, Finley T, Chappell H, Veena V, Wang K. 2022. An Improved Agrobacterium­Mediated Transformation and Genome­Editing Method for Maize Inbred B104 Using a Ternary Vector System and Immature Embryos. Front. Plant Sci. 13:860971. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.860971.

Kaplan K, Levkovich SA, DeRowe Y, Gazit E, Laor Bar­Yosef D. 2024. Mind your marker: the effect of common auxotrophic markers on complex traits in yeast. FEBS J. 291(10):2209–2220. doi:10.1111/febs.17095.

Kim JH, Rodriguez R. 2021. Glucose regulation of the paralogous glucose sensing receptors Rgt2 and Snf3 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta ­ Gen. Subj. 1865(6):129881. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129881.

Law SSY, Miyamoto T, Numata K. 2023. Organelletargeted gene delivery in plants by nanomaterials. Chem. Commun. 59(47):7166–7181. doi:10.1039/d3cc00962a.

Li CC, Hu R, Hua Xm, Ni Yx, Ge L, Zhang L, Yu W, Hao Nx, Xia H, Fang Q, Tao Zy. 2023. Construction and functional verification of size­reduced plasmids based on TMP resistance gene dfrB10. Microbiol. Spectr. 11(6):e120623. doi:10.1128/spectrum.01206­23.

Li M, Wang D, Long X, Hao Z, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Peng Y, Cheng T, Shi J, Chen J. 2022. Agrobacterium­Mediated Genetic Transformation of Embryogenic Callus in a Liriodendron Hybrid (L. Chinense × L. Tulipifera). Front. Plant Sci. 13:802128. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.802128.

Lõoke M, Kristjuhan K, Kristjuhan A. 2011. Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCRbased applications. Biotechniques 50(5):325–328. doi:10.2144/000113672.

Matsuoka A, Maliga P. 2021. Prospects for reengineering Agrobacterium tumefaciens for T­DNA delivery to chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 186(1):215–220. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab081.

Mohammadi S, Saberidokht B, Subramaniam S, Grama A. 2015. Scope and limitations of yeast as a model organism for studying human tissue­specific pathways. BMC Syst. Biol. 9(1):96. doi:10.1186/s12918­015­ 0253­0.

Mühlmann M, Forsten E, Noack S, Büchs J. 2017. Op­timizing recombinant protein expression via automated induction profiling in microtiter plates at different temperatures. Microb. Cell Fact. 16(1):220. doi:10.1186/s12934­017­0832­4.

Murai N. 2013. Review: Plant Binary Vectors of Ti Plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens with a Broad HostRange Replicon of pRK2, pRi, pSa or pVS1. Am. J. Plant Sci. 04:932–939. doi:10.4236/ajps.2013.44115.

Nakagawa T, Kurose T, Hino T, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Niwa Y, Toyooka K, Matsuoka K, Jinbo T, Kimura T. 2007. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104(1):34–41. doi:10.1263/jbb.104.34.

Nonaka S, Someya T, Kadota Y, Nakamura K, Ezura H. 2019. Super­Agrobacterium ver. 4: Improving the Transformation Frequencies and Genetic Engineering Possibilities for Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1204. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01204.

Norkunas K, Harding R, Dale J, Dugdale B. 2018. Improving agroinfiltration­based transient gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods 14:71. doi:10.1186/s13007­018­0343­2.

Numata K, Horii Y, Motoda Y, Hirai N, Nishitani C, Watanabe S, Kigawa T, Kodama Y. 2016. Direct introduction of neomycin phosphotransferase II protein into apple leaves to confer kanamycin resistance. Plant Biotechnol. 33(5):403–407. doi:10.5511/plantbiotechnology.16.0929a.

Pazour GJ, Ta CN, Das A. 1992. Constitutive mutations of Agrobacterium tumefaciens transcriptional activator virG. J. Bacteriol. 174(12):4169–4174. doi:10.1128/jb.174.12.4169­4174.1992.

Piers KL, Heath JD, Liang X, Stephens KM, Nester EW. 1996. Agrobacterium tumefaciens­mediated transformation of yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93(4):1613–1618. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.4.1613.

Prokhorova I, Altman RB, Djumagulov M, Shrestha JP, Urzhumtsev A, Ferguson A, Chang CWT, Yusupov M, Blanchard SC, Yusupova G, Puglisi JD. 2017. Aminoglycoside interactions and impacts on the eukaryotic ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114(51):e10899–e10908. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715501114.

Quach TN, Sato SJ, Behrens MR, Black PN, DiRusso CC, Cerutti HD, Clemente TE. 2023. A facile Agrobacterium­mediated transformation method for the model unicellular green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. ­ Plant 59(6):671– 683. doi:10.1007/s11627­023­10389­7.

Rinaldi C, Pizzul P, Casari E, Mangiagalli M, Tisi R, Longhese MP. 2023. The Ku complex promotes DNA end­bridging and this function is antagonized by Tel1/ATM kinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 51(4):1783– 1802. doi:10.1093/nar/gkad062.

Roberts RL, Metz M, Monks DE, Mullaney ML, Hall T, Nester EW. 2003. Purine synthesis and increased Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation of yeast and plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(11):6634–6639. doi:10.1073/pnas.1132022100.

Roushan MR, Shao S, Poledri I, Hooykaas PJ, van Heusden GP. 2022. Increased Agrobacterium­mediated transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae after deletion of the yeast ADA2 gene. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 74(2):228–237. doi:10.1111/lam.13605.

Subedi YP, Alfindee MN, Takemoto JY, Chang CWT. 2018. Antifungal amphiphilic kanamycins: New life for an old drug. Medchemcomm 9(6):909–919. doi:10.1039/c8md00155c.

Tang M, Wang Y, Wang K, Zhou Y, Zhao E, Zhang H, Zhang M, Yu H, Zhao X, Li G. 2024. Codon Optimization Enables the Geneticin Resistance Gene to Be Applied Efficiently to the Genetic Manipulation of the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Botrytis cinerea. Plants 13(2):324. doi:10.3390/plants13020324.

Tartier L, McCarey YL, Biaglow JE, Kochevar IE, Held KD. 2000. Apoptosis induced by dithiothreitol in HL­60 cells shows early activation of caspase 3 and is independent of mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 7(10):1002–1010. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400726.

Teo YL, Chang ST, Toh WK, Tor XY, Ho CL, Loh PC, Wong HL. 2022. Development of a miniaturized Ti­plasmid and helper plasmid system for Agrobacterium­mediated plant transformation. Asia­Pacific J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 30(3):23– 32. doi:10.35118/apjmbb.2022.030.3.03.

Toh WK, Teo YL, Tor XY, Loh PC, Wong HL. 2023. Development of constitutive and IPTG­inducible integron promoter­based expression systems for Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens. 3 Biotech 13:91. doi:10.1007/s13205­023­03507­0.

Van Der Fits L, Deakin EA, Hoge JHC, Memelink J. 2000. The ternary transformation system: Constitutive virG on a compatible plasmid dramatically increases Agrobacterium­mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 43(4):495–502. doi:10.1023/A:1006440221718.

Vanderwaeren L, Dok R, Voordeckers K, Nuyts S, Verstrepen KJ. 2022. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model System for Eukaryotic Cell Biology, from Cell Cycle Control to DNA Damage Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(19):11665. doi:10.3390/ijms231911665.

Vickers CE, Bydder SF, Zhou Y, Nielsen LK. 2013. Dual gene expression cassette vectors with antibiotic selection markers for engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 12(1):96. doi:10.1186/1475­2859­12­96.

Webster TD, Dickson RC. 1983. Direct selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to the antibiotic G418 following transformation with a DNA vector carrying the kanamycin­resistance gene of Tn903. Gene 26(2­ 3):243–252. doi:10.1016/0378­1119(83)90194­4.

Yoshizumi T, Oikawa K, Chuah JA, Kodama Y, Numata K. 2018. Selective Gene Delivery for Integrating Exogenous DNA into Plastid and Mitochondrial Genomes Using Peptide­DNA Complexes. Biomacromolecules 19(5):1582–1591. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00323.

Yu Y, Yu H, Peng J, Yao WJ, Wang YP, Zhang FL, Wang SR, Zhao Y, Zhao XY, Zhang XS, Su YH. 2024. Enhancing wheat regeneration and genetic transformation through overexpression of TaLAX1. Plant Commun. 5(5):100738. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100738.

Zhao H, Jia Y, Cao Y, Wang Y. 2020. Improving T­DNA Transfer to Tamarix hispida by Adding Chemical Compounds During Agrobacterium tumefaciens Culture. Front. Plant Sci. 11:501358. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.501358.

Zheng H, Wang K, Xu X, Pan J, Sun X, Hou J, Liu W, Shen Y. 2022. Highly efficient rDNA­mediated multicopy integration based on the dynamic balance of rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Biotechnol. 15(5):1511–1524. doi:10.1111/1751­7915.14010.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijbiotech.100929

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3641 | views : 898 | views : 1758

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.