Socio-economic Transformation and Agrarian Adaptation: Mahaweli System H, Sri Lanka
Dharmasiri, L. M.(1), Jayathilake P(2), Karunaraj Nishanthi(3*), Danasekara D.R.A. K(4), Kanchana, R.A. C(5), Ranwella, K.B.I. S(6), Amarasinghe, A. G(7), Rathnasekara, S(8)
(1) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(2) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(3) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(4) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(5) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(6) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(7) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(8) Department of Geography, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The global agricultural transition has created class divisions between the wealthy bourgeoisie and the laboring proletariat, thereby strengthening capitalist structures. Sri Lanka reflects this shift as it moves from subsistence to market-driven farming through policy and technological changes. The Mahaweli System H Area shows this transformation in land ownership, income, and livelihoods. Through a comprehensive investigation into the socio-economic changes in System H, this study examines the adaptive strategies employed by settlers to navigate these shifts. The mixed-method approach using the Convergent Parallel Design was applied, including semi-structured questionnaire survey and field observations. The survey was conducted with 40 settlers selected using a stratified random sample, with the consultation of the Mahaweli Residential Project Manager’s Office. The sample size was determined using a Standard Proportion-based formula with an 80% confidence level and 10% margin of error. The research identified four income categories: Higher Income (HI), Medium Lower Income (MLI), Lower Higher Income (LHI), and Lower Income (LI), illustrating the bourgeoisie and proletariat classes. Dynamic settlers expose adaptability and innovation, while conventional settlers maintain traditional practices, highlighting a socio-economic landscape. The study highlights the ongoing struggle of marginalized settlers and the complex interplay among socio-economic structures, government interventions, and individual resilience. While socio-economic dynamics persist within the framework of the bourgeoisie and proletariat, immediate radical transformations appear unlikely. The findings shed light on the difficulties of agrarian societies and offer insights into addressing vicious poverty in agrarian communities.
Keywords
References
Ahuja, R. (2002). Labour Relations in an Early Colonial Context: Madras, c.1750–1800. Modern Asian Studies, 36(4), 793–826. doi:10.1017/S0026749X0200402X
Appelrouth, S., & Desfor Edles, L. (2010). Sociological Theory in the Classical Era: Text and Readings: Chapter 2.
Bazargani, K., & Deemyad, T. (2024). Automation’s Impact on Agriculture: Opportunities, Challenges, and Economic Effects. Robotics, 13(2). doi:10.3390/robotics13020033
Beverly, G. (1981). Underdevelopment, Modes of Production, and the State in Colonial Ghana. African Studies Review, 24(1), 21–47.
Binswanger-Mkhize, H., & McCalla, A. F. (2010). The Changing Context and Prospects for Agricultural and Rural Development in Africa. Handbook of Agricultural Economics (1st ed., Vol. 4). Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/S1574-0072(09)04070-5
Dharmasiri, L. M. (2012). Dilemmas of Agrarian Transformation: Persistence of An Impoverished Peasantry in Irrigated Land Settlement Schemes In Sri Lanka. In South East Association of Geographers. Singapore: SEAGA.
Dharmasiri, L. M., & Jayarathne, M. (2021). Transformational Adaptation in Agriculture under Climate Change: A Case Study in the Dry Zone of Sri Lanka. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 53(02), 254–264. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/ijg.64269
Dissanayake, N. K. M. (2016). Evaluating New Towns in the Context of Mega Projects: A Case Study of the Mahaweli Architectural Unit, Sri Lanka (1983-1989), (December).
Gyapong, A. Y. (2019a). Land Deals, Wage Labour, and Everyday Politics. Land, 8(6). doi:10.3390/land8060094
Gyapong, A. Y. (2019b). Land Deals, Wage Labour, and Everyday Politics. Land, 8(6). doi:10.3390/land8060094
Harini, R., Susilo, B., & Nurjani, E. (2015). Geographic Information System-Based Spatial Analysis of Agricultural Land Suitability in Yogyakarta (Vol. 47).
Harini, R., Yunus, H. S., Kasto, & Hartono, S. (2012). Agricultural Land Conversion: Determinants and Impact for Food Sufficiency in Sleman Regency. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 44(2), 120–133.
Jayewardene, J., & Kilkelly, M. K. (1983). System H of the Mahaweli Development Project, Sri Lanka: 1983 Diagnostic Analysis; Water Management Synthesis Project. Water.
Kautsky, K. (1988). The Agrarian Question (Vol. I e II). Swan London, 1, 503.
Krishnaji, N. (2018). Dynamics of Land Inequality: Polarization or Pauperization? Indian Journal of Human Development, 12(2), 204–216. doi:10.1177/0973703018788742
Kumara, G. A. K. K. (1991). Growth without Capitalism: Agrarian Change in the Peasant Economy of Sri Lanka.
Napier, J. A., Haslam, R. P., Olsen, R. E., Tocher, D. R., & Betancor, M. B. (2020). Agriculture Can Help Aquaculture Become Greener. Nature Food, 1(11), 680–683. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-00182-9
Pain, A. (1986). Agricultural Research in Sri Lanka: An Historical Account. Modern Asian Studies, 20(4), 755–778. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00013718
Pierre, G. (2022). Food (in)Justice and Social Inequalities in Vegetable and Market Garden Production in Normandy, France, 103(4), 321–345. doi:10.1007/s41130-022-00176-0
Pye, O. (2021). Agrarian Marxism and the Proletariat: a Palm Oil Manifesto. Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(4), 807–826. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1667772
Ramos, S., Melissa, K., & Matin, A. (2020). Social Protection in Sri Lanka: an Analysis of the Social, Economic and Political Effectiveness of the Samurdhi Program.
Rao, N. H. (2007). A Framework for Implementing Information and Communication Technologies in Agricultural Development in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 491–518. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.02.002
Rao, P. V., & Behera, H. C. (2017). Agrarian Questions under Neoliberal Economic Policies in India: A Review and Analysis of Dispossession and Depeasantisation. The Oriental Anthropologist, 17(1), 17–42. doi:10.1177/0976343020170102
Rawlings, T. A., Hayes, K. A., Cowie, R. H., & Collins, T. M. (2007). The Identity, Distribution, and Impacts of Non-native Apple Snails in the Continental United States. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7(1), 1–14. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-97/FIGURES/11
Rupakula, R. V. (2016). Class Differentiation and Crisis of Agrarian Petty Producers in India. World Review of Political Economy, 7(1). Retrieved from www.plutojournals.com/wrpe/
Scoones, I. (2021). Pastoralists and Peasants: Perspectives on Agrarian Change. Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(1), 1–47. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1802249
Sefer, B. K. (2018). The Apotheosis of the Green Revolution and the Throes of Landless Peasant Women in Two Aegean Villages of Turkey in the 1960s.
Shanmugaratnam, N. (1985a). Colonial Agrarian Changes and Underdevelopment. Capital and Peasant Production.
Shanmugaratnam, N. (1985b). Colonial Agrarian Changes and Underdevelopment. Capital and Peasant Production.
Subejo, Dyah, W. U., Ratih, I. W., & Gagar, M. (2019). Modernization of Agriculture and Use of Information and Communication Technologies by Farmers in Coastal Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 51(3), 332–345. doi:10.22146/ijg.44914
Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size: How to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 237–239. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3224205
Withanachchi, S. S., Köpke, S., Withanachchi, C. R., Pathiranage, R., & Ploeger, A. (2014). Water Resource Management in Dry Zonal Paddy Cultivation in Mahaweli River Basin, Sri Lanka: An Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Climate Change Impacts and Traditional Knowledge. Climate, 2(4), 329–354. doi:10.3390/cli2040329
Yang, W., Xu, C., & Kong, F. (2022). Does Non-Food Cultivation of Cropland Increase Farmers’ Income? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12). doi:10.3390/ijerph19127329
Zhang, Q. F. (2015). Class Differentiation in Rural China: Dynamics of Accumulation, Commodification and State Intervention. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(3), 338–365. doi:10.1111/joac.12120
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author and Indonesian Journal of Geography

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Indonesian Journal of Geography (ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print)) is an international journal published by the Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada in collaboration with The Indonesian Geographers Association. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 225/E/KPT/2022, Vol 54 No 1 the Year 2022 - Vol 58 No 2 the Year 2026 (accreditation certificate download)






