THE IMPACT OF AUDIT RATE, PERCEIVED PROBABILITY OF AUDIT ON TAX COMPLIANCE DECISION: A Laboratory Experiment Study)
Meinarni Asnawi(1*)
(1) Faculty of Economics Cenderawasih University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to provide empirical evidence that audit rate and perceived probability of audit have impact on tax compliance. This study used a laboratory experiment to test the impact of economic factor (audit rate) and psychology factor (perceived probability of audit) on tax compliance decision. 78 participants were involved in this experiment from the master of science and doctoral program and accounting magister of FEB UGM Yogyakarta. This experiment used multilevel treatment experiment design and standard of fieldwork media for software. The results provide empirical evidence that audit rate and perceived probability of audit have significant relationship with tax compliance decision. Audit rate has indirectly related to tax compliance decisions by perceived probability of audit. We propose a model that is intended to clarify the mechanism through perceived probability of audit impact to tax compliance decisions. The result highlights the importance of obtaining a proper understanding of these factors for developing effective policies with the aim of increasing the level of compliance, and indicate that audit rate should be implemented to improve tax accuration report using perceived robability of audit by tax payer.
Keywords
References
Allais, M. 1953 “Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique
des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine”. Econometrica, 21(4), 501-46.
Allingham, M. G., and Sandmo, A., 1972. "Income Tax Evasion: A Theoritical Analysis". Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.
Alm, J. and McKee, M., 2006. "In Audit Certainty, Audit Productivity and Taxpayer
Compliance". National Tax Journal , 59 (4), 801-816.
Alm, J. and McKee, M., 1998. "Extending the Lessons of Laboratory Experiments on
Tax Compliance to Managerial and Decision Economics". Managerial and Decision Economics, 19(4), 259-275.
Alm J., Jackson, B.R., and McKee, M., 1992. "Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance With Experimental Data". National Tax Journal, 45, 107-114.
Alm, J., Jackson, B.R., M. McKee, M., 1992a "Deterrence and Beyond: Toward a
Kinder, Gentler IRS." In: Why People Pay Taxes: Tax Compliance and Enforcement,
J. Slemrod, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 311-29.
Alm, J., Cronshaw, M.B., and McKee, M., 1993. "Tax Compliance With Endogenous
Selection Rules". KYKLOS, 46(1), 27-45.
Alm, J., Sanchez, L., and De Juan, A., 1995. "Economic and Non-economic Factors in Tax Compliance". KYKLOS, 48(1), 8-18.
Alm, J., 1988. "Uncertain Tax Policies, Individual Behavior and Welfare". The American Economic Review, 27, 237-245.
Alm, J., 1991. "A Perspective on the Experimental Analysis of Taxpayer Reporting".
The Accounting Review, 66(3), 577- 593.
Alm, J. and Vazquez, M., 2001. Societal Institutions and Tax Evasion in Developing
and Transition Countries. Paper presented at the Conference Public Finance in Developing and Transition Countries, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., and Freinsteind, J. 1998. "Tax Compliance". Journal of
Economic Literature, 35 (2), 818-860.
Beck, P.J., Davis, J.S., and Jung, W., 1989. "Taxpayers' Reporting Decision and Auditing Under Information Asymmetry". The Accounting Review, 66, 535-558.
Beck, P.J. and Jung, W., 1991. "Experimental Evidence on Tax Payer Reporting Under Uncertainty". The Accounting Review, 66, 535-558.
Becker, G., 1968. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach". Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
Becker,W., Büchner, H.J., and Sleeking, S., 1987. "The Impact of Public Transfer
Expenditures on Tax Evasion". Journal of Public Economics , 34 (2), 243-252.
Chin, W., 1998. "The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equatuion
Modelling". In: Modern Method for Business Research (In Marcoulides, GA (Ed)). Mahwah.NJ.Erlbaum.
Clark, J., Friesen, L., and Muller, A., 2004. "The Good, the Bad, and the Regulator:
An Experimental Test of Two Conditional Audit Schemes." Economic Inquiry, 42(1),
69-87.
Cowell, F.A., 2006. "Cheating the Government: The Economics of Tax Evasion".
In: Do Audit Enhance Compliane? An Empirical Assessment of VAT Enforcement.
National Tax Journal, 59 (4), 817-832.
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business May 300 Cowel, F.A. and Gordon, J., 1988. "Unwillingness to Pay Tax`Evasion and Public Good Provision". Journal of Public Economics, 36, 305-321.
Dubin, J.A., 2004. Criminal Investigation Enforcement Activities and Taxpayer Noncompliance. California: California Institute of Technology.
Dubin, J.A., Graetz, M., and Wilde, L.D., 1990. "The Effect of Audit Rates on the
Federal Individual Income Tax, 1977-1986". National Tax Journal, 43(4), 395- 409.
Ellsberg, D., 1961. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms". Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 75(4), 643-669.
Erad, B., 2006. "The Influence of Tax Audit on Reporting Behavior". In: Bergman, M. and Navarez, A., 2006. "Do Audits Enhance Compliance? An Empirical Assessment of VAT Enforcement". National Tax Journal , 59 (4), 817-832.
Erad. B. and Feinstein, J., 1994. "The Role of Moral Sentiments and Audit Perceptions in Tax Compliance". Public Finance , 49, 70-89.
Feld, L.P and Frey, B.S., 2005. "Tax Compliance as The Result of a Psychological
Tax Contract: The Role of Incentive and Responsive Regulation". Working Paper.
June 76. Center for Tax System Integrity Research School of Social Sciences Australian National University.
Feld., L.P. and Frey, B.S., 2002. The Tax Authority and Taxpayer: An Exploratory
Analysis. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Zurich.
Friedland, N., Maital, S., and Rutenberg, A., (1978). "A Simulation Study of Income
Tax Evaluation". Journal of Public Economics, 10 (2), 107-116.
Ghosh, D. and Crain, T.L., 1996. "Experimental Investigation of Ethical Standards
and Perceived Probability of Audit on Intentional Noncompliance". Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(Supplement), 219-244.
Gould, J.E., 2002. Concise Handbook of Experimental Methods for theBehavioral
and Biological Sciences. United State of America: CRC Press LLC.
Hessing, D.J., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R.H.,1988. "Exploring The Limits of Self-Reports and Reasoned Action : Investigation of the Psychology of Tax Evasion Behavior".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 405-413.
Hyman, D.N., 1993. Public Finance: A Contemporary Application of Theory To Policy. 4th ed. The Eryden Press.
Jackson, B.R. and Milliron, V.C., 1986. "Tax Compliance Research: Findings, Problems and Prospect". Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125-157.
Kahn, B.E., and Sarin, R.K., 1988. "Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions under Uncertainty". Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 265-72.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision
Under Risk". Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Kardes, F., 1996. "In Defense of Experimental Consumer Psycology". Journal of
Consumer Psycology , 5 (3), 279 - 296.
Kinsey, K.A., 1992. Deterrence and Alienation Effect of IRS Enforcement: An
Analysis of Survey Data. Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan Press.
Milliron, V.C., 1985. "A Behavioral Study of The Meaning and Influence of Tax
Complexity". Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 794-816.
Milliron, V.C. and Toy, D.R., 1988. "Tax Compliance: An Investigation of Key
Features". The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 9(2), 84-104.
Quiggin, J., 1982. "A Theory of Anticipated Utility". Journal of Economic Behavior
and Organization, 3(4), 323-43.
Reinganum, J. and Wilde, L.L., 1985. "Income Tax Compliance in a Principle-Agent Framework". Journal of Public Economics, 26 (1), 1-34.
Robben, W.H., 1987. "Audit Probabilities and Tax Evasion in Business Simulation".
Economics Letters, 25, 267-270.
Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C., 2001. "Taxpayer Response to An
Increased Probability of An Audit: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota". Journal of Public Economics, 79 (3), 455-483.
Snow, A. and Warren, R.S., 2005. "Ambiguity about Audit Probability, Tax Compliance, and Taxpayer Welfare". Economic Inquiry, 43(4), 865-871.
Spicer, M.W. and Thomas, J.E., 1982 "Audit Probabilities and the Tax Evasion Decision: An Experimental Approach". Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 241-45.
Spicer, M.W. and Hero, R.E., 1985. "Tax Evasion and Heuristics". Journal of Public
Economics, 26, 263-267.
Torgler, B., 2003. "Tax`Morale and Tax Compliance: A Cross Culture Comparison".
Paper presented at the Tax Institute of America Proceedings, America.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1992 "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
Webley, P., Cole, M., and Eidjar, O., 2001. "The Prediction of Self-reported and
Hypothetical Tax Evasion: Evidence From England, France and Norway". Journal of
Economic Psychology, 22(2), 141-155.
Webley, P., Robben, H., Elffers, H., and Hensing, D., 2006. "Tax Evasion: An
Experimental Approach". In: Audit Certainty, Audit Productivity and Taxpayer
Compliance. National Tax Journal, 59(4), 801-816.
Yaari, M., 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk". Econometrica, 55(1), 95-115.
Yithaki, S., 1974. "A Note on Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis". Journal
of Public Economics, 36, 201-202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.29763
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3167 | views : 1388 | views : 3985Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business |
The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |
© 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business | Visitor Statistics |